Abstract
Objective
Salivagram is one of the imaging modalities to detect pulmonary aspiration in children. This study aims to optimize the classification of pulmonary aspiration detected by salivagram with a semi-quantitative analytical method.
Methods
This is a retrospective study involving 737 patients (471 males, 266 females; aged 1 month to 8 years; mean age 5.3 months, median age 3.0 months old) with suspected pulmonary aspiration, who had salivagram done between January 2018 and June 2019. Positive cases were divided into 10 groups (Grade 1, R2, L2, R2L2, R3, L3, R3L2, R2L3, R3L3, and 4) according to the scintigraphic findings. Aspiration index was determined as the ratio of the count in the respiratory tract to the total count in the image field of view and compared among different groups using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.
Results
A total of 180 cases had positive scintigraphic findings of various grades of aspiration (24.4%, 180/737). There is a high consistency among the two independent nuclear medicine physicians involved in the study, in determining both the disease gradings (κ = 0.919;95% CI: 0.915–0.923) and aspiration index (ICC = 0.994;95% CI: 0.993–0.996). There is no significant difference (p > 0.05) in aspiration index among the gradings in “mild” group (grade 1, R2, L2, L2R2), and “moderate” group (grade R3, R3L2, R3L3). After dividing the different grades into “mild”, “moderate” and “severe” groups, the aspiration index of “mild” group is 4.40 ± 2.01, that of “moderate” group is 16.43 ± 8.20, and that of “severe” group is 46.94 ± 14.81. Difference in groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). In ROC curve analysis, AUC of “mild” and “moderate” groups is 0.970 and that of “moderate” and “severe” groups is 0.943; the cut-off value with highest diagnostic efficiency is 6.75 between “mild” and “moderate” groups and 38.00 between “moderate” and “severe” groups.
Conclusions
We introduced a semi-quantitative analytical method in pulmonary aspiration on salivagram, to optimize and supplement to the current classification of pulmonary aspiration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(9):665–71.
Yu KJ, Park D. Clinical characteristics of dysphagic stroke patients with salivary aspiration: a STROBE-compliant retrospective study. Medicine. 2019;98(12):e14977.
Yu KJ, Moon H, Park D. Different clinical predictors of aspiration pneumonia in dysphagic stroke patients related to stroke lesion: a STROBE-complaint retrospective study. Medicine. 2018;97(52):e13968.
Hunt EB, Sullivan A, Galvin J, MacSharry J, Murphy DM. Gastric aspiration and its role in airway inflammation. Open Respir Med J. 2018;12:1–10.
Tutor JD, Gosa MM. Dysphagia and aspiration in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012;47(4):321–37.
Lanspa MJ, Jones BE, Brown SM, Dean NC. Mortality, morbidity, and disease severity of patients with aspiration pneumonia. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(2):83–90.
Rossi UG, Owens CM. The radiology of chronic lung disease in children. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(6):601–7.
Heyman S. The radionuclide salivagram for detecting the pulmonary aspiration of saliva in an infant. Pediatr Radiol. 1989;19(3):208–9.
Wu H, Zhao R. Image characteristics and classification of salivagram in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspiration in children. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38(7):617–22.
Wu H, Zhao R, Zhao X. Use of static imaging as a substitute for conventional dynamic imaging for salivagrams in children. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44(7):532–4.
Boesch RP, Daines C, Willging JP, Kaul A, Cohen AP, Wood RE, et al. Advances in the diagnosis and management of chronic pulmonary aspiration in children. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(4):847–61.
Jang DH, Choi KH, Kim DH, Lim CM, Kim JS. Comparison between the radionuclide salivagram and videofluoroscopic swallowing study methods for evaluating patients with aspiration pneumonia. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27(3):247–52.
Yang J, Codreanu I, Servaes S, Zhuang H. Radionuclide salivagram and gastroesophageal reflux scintigraphy in pediatric patients: targeting different types of pulmonary aspiration. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40(7):559–63.
Bar-Sever Z, Connolly LP, Treves ST. The radionuclide salivagram in children with pulmonary disease and a high risk of aspiration. Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25(Suppl 1):S180–3.
Drubach LA, Zurakowski D, Palmer EL 3rd, Tracy DA, Lee EY. Utility of salivagram in pulmonary aspiration in pediatric patients: comparison of salivagram and chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(2):437–41.
Ciofetta G. Gastro-esophageal studies in relationship to respiratory problems. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;54(4):372–8.
Somasundaram VH, Subramanyam P, Palaniswamy S. Salivagram revisited: justifying its routine use for the evaluation of persistent/recurrent lower respiratory tract infections in developmentally normal children. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26(7):578–85.
Cook SP, Lawless S, Mandell GA, Reilly JS. The use of the salivagram in the evaluation of severe and chronic aspiration. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;41(3):353–61.
Lee DH, Kim JM, Lee Z, Park D. The effect of radionuclide solution volume on the detection rate of salivary aspiration in the radionuclide salivagram: a STROBE-compliant retrospective study. Medicine. 2018;97(30):e11729.
Acknowledgements
We thank the SPECT staff and the technologists at our institute for their excellent support. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Funding
This work is supported by the Open Program of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province (No. HYX19026). Shanghai “Rising Stars of Medical Talent” Youth Development Program, youth Medical Talents –Medical Imaging Practitioner Program (No. SHWRS2019072).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shao, F., Zhao, X., Toyama, H. et al. Semi-quantitative assessment optimized the grading of pulmonary aspiration on salivagram in children. Ann Nucl Med 35, 321–327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01564-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01564-6