References
Cicone F, Carideo L, Scaringi C, Arcella A, Giangaspero F, Scopinaro F, et al. 18F-DOPA uptake does not correlate with IDH mutation status and 1p/19q co-deletion in glioma. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33(4):295–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-018-01328-33.
Verger A, Metellus Ph, Sala Q, Colin C, Bialecki E, Taieb D, et al. IDH mutation is paradoxically associated with higher 18F-FDOPA PET uptake in diffuse grade II and grade III gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1306–11.
Law I, Albert NL, Arbizu J, Boellaard R, Drzezga A, Galldiks N, et al. Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:540–57.
Ginet M, Zaragori T, Marie P-Y, Roch V, Gauchotte G, Rech F, et al. Integration of dynamic parameters in the analysis of 18F-FDopa PET imaging improves the prediction of molecular features of gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04509-y.
Cicone F, Carideo L, Minniti G, Scopinaro F. The mean striatal 18F-DOPA uptake is not a reliable cut-off threshold for biological tumour volume definition of glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1051–3.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaragori, T., Guedj, E. & Verger, A. Is IDH mutation status associated with 18F-FDopa PET uptake?. Ann Nucl Med 34, 228–229 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01442-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01442-1