Skip to main content
Log in

Limited role of carbidopa-assisted 18F-FDOPA PET/CT in patients with sporadic non-functional gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-FDOPA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after carbidopa premedication to localize sporadic, well-differentiated, nonfunctioning gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

Methods

Ten patients undergoing staging carbidopa-assisted 18F-FDOPA PET/CT before endoscopic or surgical resection of gastroduodenal NENs were retrospectively selected. Preoperative imaging work up also included CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in ten, six, and eight patients, respectively. Histopathological diagnosis of primary NEN was the diagnostic standard of truth. Metastatic spread was defined as the presence of histologically proven nodal, visceral, and/or bone metastases.

Results

Tumors were located in the duodenal bulb in five patients, in descending duodenum in three, and in the gastric fundus in two. Three patients presented with both lymph nodes and distant metastases, and two with exclusive lymphatic spread. CT and MRI detected primary tumor in one out of ten and three out of six patients, respectively. SRS failed to detect intestinal NEN in all cases. 18F-FDOPA PET/CT detected four primary NENs (one gastric and three duodenal tumors) and was false negative in six patients. NENs missed by 18F-FDOPA PET/CT were smaller than 10 mm in two cases and measured about 30 mm in three patients. The remaining tumor was detected only on blind endoscopic biopsy. Among patients who underwent both 18F-FDOPA PET/CT and SRS, three presented discordant results for primary tumor detection (PET/CT positive/SRS negative) and five showed concordant negative studies. 18F-FDOPA PET/CT correctly identified all three patients with both nodal and visceral metastatic disease and failed to detect lymph node metastases in both N+ M0 patients.

Conclusions

18F-FDOPA PET/CT is not sufficiently accurate for localization of primary well-differentiated nonfunctioning sporadic gastroduodenal NENs. 18F-FDOPA PET/CT’s value for the assessment of visceral and lymph node metastases needs to be clarified in multicenter trials including a larger number of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woltering EA, Bergsland EK, Beyer DT. Neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach: American Joint Committee on Cancer 2017. In: Amin MB, editor. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 351–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Sato Y, Hashimoto S, Mizuno K, Takeuchi M, Terai S. Management of gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:6817–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E, Rindi G, Kos-Kudla B, Knigge U, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:74–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delle-Fave G, O’Toole D, Sundin A, Taal B, Ferolla P, Ramageet JK, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines update for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103:119–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Farley HA, Pommier RF. Treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016;25:217–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Toole D, Delle Fave G, Jensen RT. Gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;26:719–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Massironi S, Campana D, Partelli S, Panzuto F, Rossi RE, Faggiano A, et al. Heterogeneity of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: an italian multi-center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:3200–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deerose C, Hindie E, Kebebew E, Goichot B, Pacak K, Taieb D, et al. Molecular imaging of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: current status and future directions. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1949–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Balogova S, Talbot JN, Nataf V, Michaud L, Huchet V, Kerrou K, et al. 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine vs other radiopharmaceuticals for imaging neuroendocrine tumours according to their type. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:943–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Montravers F, Kerrou K, Nataf V, Huchet V, Lotz JP, Ruszniewski P, et al. Impact of fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine-18F positron emission tomography on management of adult patients with documented or occult digestive endocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1295–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Montravers F, Grahek D, Kerrou K, Ruszniewski P, de Beco V, Aide N, et al. Can fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET replace somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with digestive endocrine tumours? J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1455–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ambrosini V, Tomassetti P, Castellucci P, Campana D, Montini G, Rubello D, et al. Comparison between 68Ga-DOTA-NOC and 18F-DOPA PET for the detection of gastro-entero-pancreatic and lung neuro-endocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1431–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haug A, Auernhammer CJ, Wängler B, Tiling R, Schmidt G, Göke B, et al. Intraindividual comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 18F-DOPA PET in patients with well-differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:765–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Putzer D, Gabriel M, Kendler D, Henninger B, Knoflach M, Kroiss A, et al. Comparison of (68)Ga-DOTA-Tyr(3)-octreotide and (18)F-fluoro-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography in neuroendocrine tumor patients. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;54:68–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jager PL, Chirakal R, Marriott CJ, Brouwers AH, Koopmans KP, Gulenchyn KY. 6-L-18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET in neuroendocrine tumors: basic aspects and emerging clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:573–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koopmans KP, de Vries EG, Kema IP, Elsinga PH, Neels OC, Sluiter WJ, et al. Staging of carcinoid tumours with 18FDOPA PET: a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:728–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fiebrich HB, de Jong JR, Kema IP, Koopmans KP, Sluiter W, Dierckx RA, et al. Total (18)F-dopa PET tumour uptake reflects metabolic endocrine tumour activity in patients with a carcinoid tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1854–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Imperiale A, Rust E, Gabriel S, Detour J, Goichot B, Duclos B, et al. 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of unknown origin: relation to tumor origin and differentiation. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kauhanen S, Seppänen M, Nuutila P. Premedication with carbidopa masks positive finding of insulinoma and beta-cell hyperplasia in [18F]-dihydroxy-phenyl-alanine positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5307–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leroy-Freschini B, Amodru V, Addeo P, Sebag F, Vix M, Brunaud L, et al. Early 18F-FDOPA PET/CT imaging after carbidopa premedication as a valuable diagnostic option in patients with insulinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:686–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Soussan M, Nataf V, Kerrou K, Grahek D, Pascal O, Talbot JN, et al. Added value of early 18F-FDOPA PET/CT acquisition time in medullary thyroid cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:775–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Helali M, Addeo P, Heimburger C, Detour J, Goichot B, Bachellier P, et al. Carbidopa-assisted 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET/CT for the localization and staging of non-functioning neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. Ann Nucl Med. 2016;30:659–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessio Imperiale.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors (AI, GA, MH, DT, PP, BG, PA, PB) declare that they have no conflict of interest in the present manuscript.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical approval

No institutional approval was required for retrospective studies.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imperiale, A., Averous, G., Helali, M. et al. Limited role of carbidopa-assisted 18F-FDOPA PET/CT in patients with sporadic non-functional gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Ann Nucl Med 33, 697–707 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-019-01378-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-019-01378-1

Keywords

Navigation