Skip to main content
Log in

On the modern deep learning approaches for precipitation downscaling

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deep Learning (DL) based downscaling has recently become a popular tool in earth sciences. Multiple DL methods are routinely used to downscale coarse-scale precipitation data to produce more accurate and reliable estimates at local scales. Several studies have used dynamical or statistical downscaling of precipitation, but the availability of ground truth still hinders the accuracy assessment. A key challenge to measuring such a method's accuracy is comparing the downscaled data to point-scale observations, which are often unavailable at such small scales. In this work, we carry out DL-based downscaling to estimate the local precipitation using gridded data from the India Meteorological Department (IMD). To test the efficacy of different DL approaches, we apply SR-GAN and three other contemporary approaches (viz., DeepSD, ConvLSTM, and UNET) for downscaling and evaluating their performance. The downscaled data is validated with precipitation values at IMD ground stations. We find overall reasonably well reproduction of original data in SR-GAN approach as noted through M.S.E., variance statistics and correlation coefficient (CC). It is found that the SR-GAN method outperforms three other methods documented in this work (CCSR-GAN = 0.8806; CCUNET = 0.8399; CCCONVLSTM = 0.8311; CCDEEPSD = 0.8037). A custom V.G.G. network, used in the SR-GAN, is developed in this work using precipitation data. This DL method offers a promising alternative to other existing statistical downscaling approaches. It is noted that superiority in the SR-GAN approach is achieved through the perceptual loss concept, wherein it overcomes the issue of smooth reconstruction and is consequently able to capture better fine-scale details of data considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The gridded data used in this study can be obtained from the IMD website (imdpune.gov.in). Any other data may be made available from the corresponding author at a reasonable request.

References

  • Baño-Medina J, Manzanas R, Gutiérrez JM (2020) Configuration and intercomparison of deep learning neural models for statistical downscaling. Geosci Model Dev 13:2109–2124. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2109-2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Kuang Q, Shen C, Liu J, Tan X, Liu W (2020) ResLap: generating high-resolution climate prediction through image super-resolution. IEEE Access 8:39623–39634. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2974785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong C, Loy CC, He K, Tang X (2015) Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. CoRR abs/1501.00092

  • Dueben PD, Bauer P (2018) Challenges and design choices for global weather and climate models based on machine learning. Geosci Model Dev 11:3999–4009. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3999-2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne DJ, Christensen HM, Subramanian AC, Monahan AH (2020) Machine learning for stochastic parameterization: generative adversarial networks in the Lorenz ’96 Model. J Adv Model Earth Syst 12:e2019MS001896. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001896

  • Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial nets. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on neural information processing systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 2

  • Haq MA (2022a) CDLSTM: a novel model for climate change forecasting. Comput Mater Contin 71:2363–2381. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.023059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq MA (2022b) SMOTEDNN: a novel model for air pollution forecasting and AQI classification. Comput Mater Contin 71:1403–1425. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.021968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq MA, Khan MAR (2022) DNNBoT: deep neural network-based botnet detection and classification. Comput Mater Contin 71:1729–1750. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.020938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq MA, Azam MF, Vincent C (2021) Efficiency of artificial neural networks for glacier ice-thickness estimation: a case study in western Himalaya, India. J Glaciol 67:671–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq MA, Khan MAR, AL-Harbi T (2022) Development of PCCNN-based network intrusion detection system for EDGE computing. Comput Mater Contin 71:1769–1788. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.018708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harilal N, Singh M, Bhatia U (2021) Augmented convolutional LSTMs for generation of high-resolution climate change projections. IEEE Xplore 9:25208–25218. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3057500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris L, McRae ATT, Chantry M, Dueben PD, Palmer TN (2022) A generative deep learning approach to stochastic downscaling of precipitation forecasts. J Adv Model Earth Syst 14:e2022MS003120. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003120

  • Izumi T, Amagasaki M, Ishida K, Kiyama M (2022) Super-resolution of sea surface temperature with convolutional neural network- and generative adversarial network-based methods. J Water Clim Chang 13:1673–1683. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2022.291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar B, Chattopadhyay R, Singh M, Chaudhari N, Kodari K, Barve A (2021) Deep learning–based downscaling of summer monsoon rainfall data over Indian region. Theoret Appl Climatol 143:1145–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03489-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar B, Abhishek N, Chattopadhyay R, George S, Singh BB, Samanta A, Patnaik BSV, Gill SS, Nanjundiah RS, Singh M (2022) Deep learning based short-range forecasting of Indian summer monsoon rainfall using earth observation and ground station datasets. Geocarto Int:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2136262

  • Ledig C, Theis L, Huszar F, Caballero J, Cunningham A, Acosta A, Aitken A, Tejani A, Totz J, Wang Z, Shi W (2017) Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. arXiv.org

  • Leinonen J, Guillaume A, Yuan T (2019) Reconstruction of cloud vertical structure with a generative adversarial network. Geophys Res Lett 46:7035–7044. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinonen J, Nerini D, Berne A (2020) Stochastic super-resolution for downscaling time-evolving atmospheric fields with a generative adversarial network. arXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3032790

  • Liu J, Sun Y, Ren K, Zhao Y, Deng K, Wang L (2022) A Spatial downscaling approach for windsat satellite sea surface wind based on generative adversarial networks and dual learning scheme. Remote Sensing 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030769

  • Oliver MA, Webster R (1990) Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 4:313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799008941549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama N, Ishizaki NN, Koide S, Yoshida H (2022) Deep generative model super-resolves spatially correlated multiregional climate data. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.12433

  • Pai DS, Stidhar L, Rajeevan M, Sreejith OP, Satbhai NS, Mukhopadhyay B (2014) Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25°

    Google Scholar 

  • Passarella LS, Mahajan S, Pal A, Norman MR (2022) Reconstructing high resolution ESM data through a novel Fast Super Resolution Convolutional Neural Network (FSRCNN). Geophys Res Lett 49:e2021GL097571. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097571

  • Rajeevan M, Bhate J, Kale JD, Lal B (2006) High resolution daily gridded rainfall data for the Indian region: analysis of break and active monsoon spells. Curr Sci Assoc 91:296–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichstein M, Camps-Valls G, Stevens B, Jung M, Denzler J, Carvalhais N, Prabhat (2019) Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566:195–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1

  • Sanjay J, Ramarao MVS, Ingle S, Singh BB, Krishnan R (2020) Regional climate change datasets for South Asia. axviv 1–4. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.10387

  • Seaby LP, Refsgaard JC, Sonnenborg TO, Stisen S, Christensen JH, Jensen KH (2013) Assessment of robustness and significance of climate change signals for an ensemble of distribution-based scaled climate projections. J Hydrol 486:479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serifi A, Günther T, Ban N (2021) Spatio-temporal downscaling of climate data using convolutional and error-predicting neural networks. Front Climate (3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.656479

  • Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2015) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv:1409.1556. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.1556

  • Singh BB, Singh M, Singh D (2021) An overview of climate change over South Asia: observations, projections, and recent advances. In: Singh RB, Chatterjee S, Mishra M, de Lucena AJ (Eds.), Practices in regional science and sustainable regional development: experiences from the global south. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp. 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2221-2_12

  • Stengel K, Glaws A, Hettinger D, King RN (2020) Adversarial super-resolution of climatological wind and solar data. Proc Nat Acad Sci 117:16805–16815. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918964117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandal T, Kodra E, Ganguly S, Michaelis A, Nemani R, Ganguly AR (2017) DeepSD: Generating high resolution climate change projections through single image super-resolution. arXiv.org 1–9. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03126

  • Xiong Y, Guo S, Chen J, Deng X, Sun L, Zheng X, Xu W (2020) Improved SRGAN for Remote Sensing Image Super-Resolution Across Locations and Sensors. Remote Sensing 12(8):1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/1263rs1208

Download references

Acknowledgements

IITM Pune is funded by the Ministry of Earth Science (MoES), the Government of India. This work was done using HPC facilities provided by MoES at IITM Pune.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.K., B.B.S., and R.C. have conceptualized the idea and contributed to the manuscript preparation. K.A. developed the code for the DL methods, analyzed the data and produced the plots. R.S.N. contributed to preparing the manuscript. N.A., M.S., and S.A. Rao helped with manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bipin Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, B., Atey, K., Singh, B.B. et al. On the modern deep learning approaches for precipitation downscaling. Earth Sci Inform 16, 1459–1472 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-00970-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-00970-4

Keywords

Navigation