Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding and Preventing Torture: a Review of the Literature

  • Published:
Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 23 September 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

This article reviews the social scientific literature on the causes of and prevention of torture, analyzes its successes and failures, and proposes a way forward. Many researchers have adopted a rational-actor, principal-agent framework, which fails to fully account for the multiple and often irrational motives of actors who work within complex bureaucracies. Researchers have also tended to follow the lead of practitioners, critiquing their approaches at prevention but not providing their own evidence-based recommendations. Future research should examine the role of irrational motives, multiple actors, and complex bureaucracies in causing torture to happen, at the level of individuals, governmental institutions, and nation-states. The lessons from this research can help advocates better convince individual actors that torture is unethical and ineffective, better direct interventions into the structure of complex bureaucracies, and better direct international advocacy, providing other solutions besides “naming and shaming” campaigns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data and Materials

This article used publicly available research.

Change history

References

  • Adams GB, Balfour DL, Reed GE (2006) Abu Ghraib, administrative evil, and moral inversion: The value of “putting cruelty first”. Public Adm Rev 66:680-693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allendoerfer MG, Murdie A, Welch RM (2020) The path of the boomerang: Human rights campaigns, third-party pressure, and human rights. Int Stud Q 64:111-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International (2023) Torture. https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/torture/. Accessed 10 July 2023.

  • Arnon D, Haschke P, Park B (2023) The right accounting of wrongs: Examining temporal changes to human rights monitoring and reporting. BJPoIS 53:163-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrigo JM, Bennett R (2007). Organizational supports for abusive interrogations in the “War on Terror”. PAC 13:411-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsenault EG, Chiang C (2020) The U.S. Department of Defense and its torture program. Armed Forces Soc 46:191-213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes J (2017) A genealogy of the torture taboo. Routledge, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Basoglu M (ed) (2017) Torture and its definition in international law: An interdisciplinary approach. Oxford, New York.

  • Beger A, Hill D (2019) Examining repressive and oppressive state violence using the Ill-Treatment and Torture data. Confl Manag Peace Sci 36:626-644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin MS (2021) Does criminalizing torture deter police torture? Am J Pol Sci, online first.

  • Blakeley R (2007) Why torture? Rev Int Stud 33:373-394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohara AK, Mitchell NJ, Nepal M, Raheem N (2008) Human rights violations, corruption, and the policy of repression. Policy Stud 36:1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita B, Downs GW, Smith A, Cherif FM (2005) Thinking inside the box: A closer look at democracy and human rights. Int Stud Q 49:439-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver R, Handley L (2016) Does torture prevention work? University of Liverpool Press, Liverpool.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carver R, Handley L (2020) Evaluating National Preventive Mechanisms: A conceptual model. J Hum Rights Prac 12:387-408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celermajer D (2018) The prevention of torture: An ecological approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler D (2000) Voices from S-21: Terror and history in Pol Pot’s secret prison. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheesman N (2022). Torture in Thailand at the limits of law. Law Soc Inq, online first: 1-26.

  • Chilton AS, Versteeg M (2015) The failure of constitutional torture prohibitions. J Leg Stud 44:417-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cingranelli DL, Filippov M (2018) Are human rights practices improving? Am Polit Sci Rev 112: 1083-1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cingranelli DL, Richards DL (2010). The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project. Hum Rights Q 32:401-424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cingranelli D, Mark S, Gibney M, Haschke P, Wood R, Arnon D (2019) Human rights violations and violent internal conflict. Soc Sci 8:41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AM (2018) Laws, talk, and human rights: The impact of treaty ratification, UN criticism, and democratic change on torture. J Hum Rights 17:18-435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AM, Sikkink K (2013) Information effects and human rights data: Is the good news about increased human rights information bad news for human rights measures? Hum Rights Q 35:539-568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AM, Sikkink K (2016) Response to David L Richards. Hum Rights Q 38:493-496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole WM (2012). Human rights as myth and ceremony? Reevaluating the effectiveness of human rights treaties, 1981-2007. Am J Sociol 117:1131-1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole WM (2015) Mind the gap: State capacity and the implementation of human rights treaties. Int Organ 69:405-441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole WM (2016) Managing to mitigate abuse: Bureaucracy, democracy, and human rights, 1984 to 2010. Int J Comp Sociol 57:69-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole WM, Ramirez FO (2013) Conditional decoupling: Assessing the impact of national human rights institutions, 1981 to 2004. Am Sociol Rev 78:702-725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collard M (2019) Torture as state crime: A criminological analysis of the transnational institutional torturer. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad CR (2014) Divergent incentives for dictators: Domestic institutions and (international promises not to) torture. J Conflict Resolut 58:34-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad CR, DeMeritt JHR (2014) Unintended consequences: The effect of advocacy to end torture on empowerment rights violations. In: Lightcap T, Pfiffner JP (eds) Examining torture: Empirical studies of state repression. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp 159-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad CR, Haglund J, Moore WH (2014) Torture allegations as events data: Introducing the Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) dataset. J Peace Res 51:429-438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad CR, Hill DW, Moore WH (2018) Torture and the limits of democratic institutions. J Peace Res 55:3-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad CR, Moore WH (2010). What stops the torture? Am J Pol Sci 54:459-476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad CR, Ritter EH (2013) Treaties, tenure, and torture: The conflicting domestic effects of international law. J Polit 75:397-409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creamer CD, Simmons BA (2019) Do self-reporting regimes matter? Evidence from the Convention Against Torture. Int Stud Q 63:1051-1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crelinsten RD (2003) The world of torture: A constructed reality. Theor Criminol 7(3):293-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Ambruoso WL (2015) Norms, perverse effects, and torture. International Theory 7:33-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Ambruoso WL (2022) American torture from the Philippines to Iraq: A recurring nightmare. Oxford, New York.

  • Davenport C (2007) State repression and political order. Ann Rev Polit Sci 10:1-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport C (2020) Introducing DyoRep: A database of perpetrator-victim dyads within repressive spells. J Hum Rights 19:117-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMeritt JHR, Conrad CR (2019) Repression substitution: Shifting human rights violations in response to UN naming and shaming. Civ Wars 21:128-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiBlasi L (2020) From shame to new name: How naming and shaming creates pro-government militias. Int Stud Q 64:906-918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A, Gassebner M, Siemers LH (2010) Does terrorism threaten human rights? Evidence from panel data. J Law Econ 53:65-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drohan B (2017) Brutality in an age of human rights: Activism and counterinsurgency at the end of the British empire. Cornell, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois L (1990) Torture and the construction of an enemy: The example of Argentina 1976-1983. Dialect Anthropol 15:317-328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck C, Fariss CJ (2018) Ill-treatment and torture in Sweden: A critique of cross-case comparisons. Hum Rights Q 40:591-604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einolf CJ (2007) The fall and rise of torture: A comparative historical analysis. Sociol Theor 25:101-121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einolf CJ (2014) America in the Philippines, 1899-1902: The first torture scandal. Palgrave-Macmillan, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Einolf CJ (2021) How torturers are made: Evidence from Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. J Hum Rights 20:381-395.

  • Einolf, CJ (2022) How torture fails: Evidence of misinformation from torture-induced confessions in Iraq. J Glob Secur Stud 7(1).

  • Evans MD, Modvig J (eds) (2020). Research handbook on torture: Legal and medical perspectives on prohibition and prevention. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fariss CJ (2014) Respect for human rights has improved over time: Modeling the changing standard of accountability. Am Polit Sci Rev 108:297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fariss CJ (2018) The changing standard of accountability and the positive relationship between human rights treaty ratification and compliance. Brit J Polit Sci 48:239-271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fariss CJ, Dancy G (2017) Measuring the impact of human rights: Conceptual and methodological debates. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 13:273-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell M (2020) The ticking bomb scenario: Evaluating torture as an interrogation method. In: Evans MJ, Modvig J (eds), Research handbook on torture: Legal and medical perspectives on prohibition and prevention. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan MJ, Nesbitt NH (2009) Do norms reduce torture? J Leg Stud 38:445-470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodare J (2016) The European witch-hunt. Routledge, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory S, Timerman D (1986) Rituals of the modern state: The case of torture in Argentina. Dialect Anthropol 11:63-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton EM (2008) Sticks and stones: Naming and shaming the human rights problem. Int Organ 62:689-716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton E (2013) Making human rights a reality. Princeton University Press.

  • Hafner-Burton EM, Ron J (2009) Seeing double. World Polit 61:360-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton EM, Tsutsui K (2005) Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. Am J Sociol 110:1373–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton EM, Tsutsui K (2007) Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law to matter where needed most. J Peace Res 44:407-425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajjar L (2008) Sovereign bodies, sovereign states and the problem of torture. In: Falk R, Elver H, Hajjar L (eds) Human rights: Critical concepts in political science, volume II, pp 228-261. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haritos-Fatouros M (2003) The psychological origins of institutionalized torture. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haschke P (2018) Human rights in democracies. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haschke P, Arnon D (2020) What bias? Changing standards, information effects, and human rights measurement. J Hum Rights 19:33-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassner RE (2020) What do we know about interrogational torture? International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 33:4-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway OA (2002). Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law J 111:1935–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatz S (2021) What shapes public support for torture, and among whom? Hum Rights Q 43:683-698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix C, Wong WH (2013) When is the pen truly mighty? Regime type and the efficacy of naming and shaming in curbing human rights abuses. Br J Polit Sci 43:651-672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heurich SJ, Vaughn MS (2009) Ill-treatment and torture at Abu Ghraib prison: Irrational policy implementation and administrative breakdown. Crim Justice Stud 22:181-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill DW (2010) Estimating the effects of human rights treaties on state behavior. J Polit 72:1161–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill DW, Jones ZM (2014) An empirical evaluation of explanations for state repression. Am Polit Sci Rev 108:661-687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollyer JR, Rosendorff P (2011) Domestic politics and the accession of authoritarian regimes to human rights treaties. Q J Polit Sci 6:275–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houck SC, Repke MA (2017) When and why we torture: A review of psychology research. Transl Issues Psychol Sci 3:272-283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins MK (2002). State violence in Brazil: The professional morality of torturers. In: Rotker S (ed) Citizens of fear: Urban violence in Latin America, Rutgers Princeton, New Jersey, pp 141-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins MK (2005) Torture 101: Lessons from the Brazilian case. J Third World Stud 22:161-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins MK (2012) State torture: Interviewing perpetrators, discovering facilitators, theorizing cross-nationally – proposing “Torture 101”. State Crime J 1:45-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins MK, Haritos-Fatouros M, Zimbardo PG (2002) Violence workers: Police torturers and murderers reconstruct Brazilian atrocities. University of California, Berkeley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JL, Hall SL, Hill DW (2018). Democracy and police violence. Res Politics 5:1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones ZM, Lupu Y (2018) Is there more violence in the middle? Am J Pol Sci, 62:652-667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn-Nisser S (2021) For better or worse: Shaming, faming, and human rights abuse. J Peace Res 58:479-493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanavou AA, Path K (2017) The lingering effects of thought reform: The Khmer Rouge S-21 personnel. J Asian Stud 76(1): 87-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns EM, Young JK (2020) Torture logic: Why some Americans support the use of torture in counterterrorism. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith LC (2002) Constitutional provisions for individual human rights (1977-1996): Are they more than mere “window dressing?” Polit Res Q 55:111-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith LC, Tate CN, Poe SC (2009) Is the law a mere parchment barrier to human rights abuse? J Polit 71:644–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly T (2011) This side of silence: Human rights, torture, and the recognition of cruelty. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly T (2019). The struggle against torture: Challenges, assumptions and new directions. J Hum Rights Prac 11:324-333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny PD (2010). The meaning of torture. Polity 42: 131-155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft RN (2014) Violent accounts: Understanding the psychology of perpetrators through South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krommendijk, J (2015) The domestic effectiveness of international human rights monitoring in established democracies: The case of UN human Rights treaty bodies. Rev Int Organ 10:489-512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laguardia F (2017) Deterring torture: The preventive power of criminal law and its promise for inhibiting state abuses. Hum Rights Q 39:189-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leo R (2009) Police interrogation and American justice. Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy AW (2012) Torture and impunity: The U.S. doctrine of coercive interrogation. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midlefort HCE (1972) Witch hunting in southwestern Germany, 1562-1684: The social and intellectual foundations. Stanford, Berkeley, California.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miles SH (2020) The torture doctors: Human rights crimes and the road to justice. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram S (1973) Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller P, Gronke P, Rejali D (2014) Torture and public opinion: The partisan dimension. In: Lightcap T, Pfiffner JP (eds), Examinng torture: Empirical studies of state repression. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore WH (2010) Incarceration, interrogation, and counterterror: Do (liberal) democratic institutions constrain Leviathan? PS: Polit Sci Polit 43:421-424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdie AM, Davis DR (2012). Shaming and blaming: Using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. Int Stud Q 56:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer E (2005) Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? J Conflict Resolut 49:925–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery S (2016) Interrogation, intelligence and security: Controversial British techniques. Manchester University Press, Manchester UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M (2018). Torture: An expert’s confrontation with an everyday evil. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M, Birk M, Molina G (eds) (2019) The United Nations Convention Against Torture and its Optional Protocol: A commentary, second edition. Oxford, New York.

  • Osiel MJ (2001) Constructing subversion in Argentina’s Dirty War. Representations 75:119-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry J (2010) Understanding torture: Law, violence, and political identity. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza JA (2017). Repression and terrorism: A cross-national empirical analysis of types of repression and domestic terrorism. Terror Polit Violence 29:102-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza JA, Walsh JI (2009) Transnational terror and human rights. Int Stud Q 53:125-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejali D (2007) Torture and democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejali D (2020) The field of torture today: Ten years on from Torture and democracy. In: Barela SJ, Fallon M, Gaggioli G, Ohlin JD (eds), Interrogation and torture: Integrating efficacy with law and morality. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 71-108.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Quilodran C, Cottam M (2018) Explaining torture: A case study. Int J of Criminol 7:206-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardot S (2014). “You know what to do with them”: The formulation of orders and engagement in war crimes. Aggress Violent Behav 19:83-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards DL (2016) The myth of information effects in human rights data: Response to Ann Marie Clark and Katherine Sikkink, Hum Rights Q 38:477-492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards DL, Webb A, Clay KC (2015) Respect for physical-integrity rights in the twenty-first century: Evaluating Poe and Tate’s model 20 years later. J Hum Rights 14:291-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin MA, Morgan RK (2021) Terrorism and the varieties of civil liberties. J Glob Secur Stud 6(3).

  • Shapiro D (2003) The tortured, not the torturers, are ashamed. Soc Res 70:1131-1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma M, Massagé I, McDonald K (2012) Lawyers’ intervention at pretrial stage helps to prevent torture, illegal detention and other human rights violations: Experiences of Advocacy Forum – Nepal. J Hum Rights Prac 4:253-272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigvardsdotter E, Marjan Vaez A, Hedman R, and Saboonchi F (2016) Prevalence of torture and other war-related traumatic events in forced migrants: A systematic review. Torture J 26:41-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons BA (2009) Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suh CS (2019) More than words: Professional legal activism and the prevention of torture in South Korea. Hum Rights Q 41:646-671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taussig M (1984) Culture of terror – space of death. Roger Casement’s Putumayo Report and the explanation of torture. Comp Stud in Soc and His 26:467-497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor F (2020) The torture machine: Racism and police violence in Chicago. Haymarket, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson M, Bernath B (2020). Preventing torture: What works? In: Barela SJ, Fallon M, Gaggioli G, Ohlin JD (eds) Interrogation and torture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 471-492.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly (1984) Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. United Nations Treaty Series 1465:85.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2023) Global Appeal 2023. https://reporting.unhcr.org/globalappeal. Accessed 10 July 2023.

  • Viola L (2017) Stalinist perpetrators on trial: Scenes from the great terror in Soviet Ukraine. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Staden A (2022) The conditional effectiveness of soft law: Compliance with the decisions of the Committee Against Torture. Hum Rights Rev 23:451-478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl R (2017) Just violence: Torture and human rights in the eyes of the police. Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. I., and Piazza, J. A. (2010). Why respecting physical integrity rights reduces terrorism. Comp Polit Stud 43(5), 551-577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch R (2017) National Human Rights Institutions: Domestic implementation of international human rights law. J Hum Rights 16:96-116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfendale J (2020) The making of a torturer. In: Knittel SC, Goldberg ZJ (eds) The Routledge international handbook of perpetrator studies. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood RM, Gibney M (2010) The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A re-introduction and a comparison to CIRI. Hum Rights Q 32:367-400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Vander Beken T, Police torture in China and its causes: A review of the literature. Aust N Z J Crimonol 43:557-579.

  • Zartner D, Ramos J (2011) Human rights as reputation builder: Compliance with the Convention Against Torture. Hum Rights Rev 12:71-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zech ST (2017) Counter-terrorizing: The use of torture in Peru’s counterterrorism campaign. Terror Polit Viol 29:254-276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Kiyani G, Crabtree C (2022) New evidence that naming and shaming influences state human rights practices. J Hum Rights.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northern Illinois University, 1425 W. Lincoln Highway, DeKalb, IL, 60115, USA

    Christopher J. Einolf

Authors
  1. Christopher J. Einolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Einolf.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This article did not involve research with human participants or animals.

Consent

This article did not involve research with human subjects.

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

In this article, one of the cited author’s names is spelled incorrectly - it should be Ruth Blakeley, not Ruth Blakely. The original paper has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Einolf, C.J. Understanding and Preventing Torture: a Review of the Literature. Hum Rights Rev 24, 319–338 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-023-00696-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-023-00696-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation