Skip to main content
Log in

Lowe vs Lewis vs Lowe on Temporary Intrinsics

  • Published:
Acta Analytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We find that E. J. Lowe’s resolution to David Lewis’s problem of temporary intrinsics is wrong, but not quite for the reasons adduced by Lewis himself. Our discussion hinges on a connection between state-independent properties and intrinsic properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In fact this is not quite right. Our best physical theory teaches us things are really patterns of excitation in (continuous) quantum fields, the excitations of which are manifested as (discrete) particles in measurement situations. However, I leave this point aside, for Lowe’s solution can be dealt on his own terms. It appears that Lowe intends a classical account too, since on a quantum account the uncertain trajectories of particles introduce their own thorny problems to do with persistence.

  2. In fact, Lewis is only presenting Lowe’s position here; but he does appear to endorse this point nonetheless—at least, he appears to accept it as a contingent feature of reality.

  3. The reviewer also rightly pointed out that Lowe’s own (admittedly much later) view of persons (e.g., in Lowe 2006) conflicts with the Democritean resolution, since he views persons as simple (non-composite) substances that nonetheless have temporary intrinsics (e.g., feeling pain at one time and not at another).

References

  • Lewis, D.K. (1983). Extrinsic properties. Philosophical Studies, 44, 197–200. Reprinted in his Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge University Press (pp. 111–115).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K. (1988). Rearrangement of particles: Reply to Lowe. Analysis, 48, 65–72. Reprinted in his Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge University Press (pp. 187–195).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J. (1987). Lewis on perdurance versus endurance. Analysis, 73(3), 152–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J. (2006). Non-Cartesian substance dualism and the problem of mental causation. Erkenntnis, 65(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, L. (1974). Space, time, and spacetime. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1952). Symmetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean Rickles.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rickles, D. Lowe vs Lewis vs Lowe on Temporary Intrinsics. Acta Anal 37, 173–177 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00472-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00472-2

Navigation