Skip to main content
Log in

Valuing technology

  • Articles
  • Published:
Knowledge, Technology & Policy

Abstract

In order to make intelligent decisions about implementing and managing a technology, managers must be able to estimate the value of the technology ex ante and to measure that value ex post. If it is going to be of practical use, any overall theory of technology must include methods for estimating and measuring the value of technology. While some of this value is tangible and relatively easy to estimate and measure, much of the value is intangible and very difficult to estimate and measure. Unfortunately, the state of the art in estimating and measuring the value of technology, particularly intangible value, is primitive at best. The bursting of the dot-com bubble is only the most recent example that illustrates the inadequacy of current practice. Using information technology as an example, this paper explores techniques for estimating and measuring the intangible value of technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • The 1997 Nobel Prize in Economics. 〈http://www.ams.org/new-in-math/nobel1997econ.html.〉

  • Benaroch, M. (2002). Managing Information Technology Investment Risk: A Real Options Perspective. Syracuse University. 〈http://sominfo.syr.edu/facstaff/mbenaroc/PAPERS/jmis/jmis-1.pdf.〉

  • Boer, F.P. (2002). The Real Options Solution: Finding Value in a High-Risk World. New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. (1998). Beyond the Productivity Paradox: Computers Are the Catalyst for Bigger Changes. MIT Sloan School and University of Pennsylvania. 〈http://grace.wharton.upenn.edu/~lhitt/bpp.pdf.〉

  • Brynjolfsson, E. and Yang, S. (1999). The Intangible Costs and Benefits of Computer Investments: Evidence from the Financial Markets. Cambridge: MIT Sloan School. 〈http://ebusiness.mit.edu/erik/ITQ00-11-25.pdf.〉

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A., and Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach. 〈http://www.in-the-money.com/artandpap/Option%20Pricing%20-20A%20Simplified%20Approach.doc.〉

  • Dai, Q., Kauffman, R.J., and March, S.T. (2000). Analyzing Investments in Object-Oriented Middleware: An Options Perspective. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. 〈http://misrc.umn.edu/wpaper/WorkingPapers/misrc_dkm_itm_fullpaper.pdf.〉

    Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj, S. and Kohli, R. (2002). The IT Payoff. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (1999). “Beyond the Information Revolution.” The Atlantic Monthly, October 1999.

  • Foley, S. and Mahmood, T. (1996). Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Harvard Business School Case Study 9-794-024.

  • Gordon, R.J. (2002). Hi-Tech Innovation and Productivity Growth: Does Supply Create Its Own Demand? Northwestern University, 〈http://faculty-web.at.northwestern.edu/economics/gordon/NBERPaper.pdf〉

  • Gu, F. and Lev, B. (2001). Intangible Assets: Measurement, Drivers, Usefulness. 〈http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~blev/intangible-assets.doc〉

  • Gwartney, J.D., Stroup, R.L., and Sobel, R.S. (2000). Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambal, A., Henderson, J., and Mohsenzadeh, H. (1992). Strategic Management of Information Technology Investments: An Options Perspective, 〈http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~akambil/publications/option~1.pdf.〉

  • Kulatilaka, N., Balasubramanian, P., and Storck, J. (1996). Managing Information Technology Investments: A Capability-based Real Options Approach. Boston: Boston University. http://management.bu.edu/pdf/ITvalue.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R.L. DSS Value and Time-Constrained Decision Making. Charlotte: University of NC at Charlotte. http://hsb.baylor.edu/ramsowner/ais.ac.97/papers/kumar.htm.

  • Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C. (2002). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V.J. and Zmud, R.J. (2002). The Value Relevance of Information Technology Investment Announcements: Incorporating Industry Strategic IT Role. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE Computer Society. 〈http://dlib2.computer.org/conferen/hicss/1435/pdf/14350216.pdf.〉

  • Strassmann, P.A. (1997). The Squandered Computer. New Canaan: The Information Economics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann, P.A. (1998). The Value of Knowledge Capital. 〈http://www.strassmann.com/pubs/valuekc〉

  • Strassmann, P.A. (1999). Information Productivity: Assessing the Information Management Costs of US Industrial Corporations. New Canaan: The Information Economics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyk, R.J. (1999). Technology and the Corporate Board. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Richard A. Howey is an information systems consultant in the Human Resources Management practice at IBM Business Consulting Services where he applies data warehousing and other advanced analytical software technologies to satisfy the information needs of HR management professionals. He has over 27 years of experience in information systems as a software developer, project manager, and consultant. In addition to his professional activities, he recently completed a Master of Science degree in management of technology at the University of Minnesota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howey, R.A. Valuing technology. Know Techn Pol 17, 44–64 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-004-1003-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-004-1003-6

Keywords

Navigation