Skip to main content
Log in

Making and Breaking Abstinence Pledges: Moral Foundations and the Purity Movement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purity movement encourages teenagers and young adults to make abstinence pledges, which are promises not to engage in premarital sexual intercourse. Moral foundations theory contends that there are individual differences in the bases of moral decision-making. The purpose of this study was to investigate, among a large sample (N = 961) of U.S. college students, whether there are differences in moral foundations between individuals who make and do not make abstinence pledges—and, among individuals who make an abstinence pledge, between those who do and do not break their pledge. Results indicated that abstinence pledgers endorsed greater binding foundations than those who did not make a pledge. Among abstinence pledgers, women who kept their pledge reported higher binding foundations than both men who kept their pledge and women who broke their pledge. Overall, these results suggest links between moral foundations and abstinence pledging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, M. D., Öz, H. C. M., & Marsden, A. D., III. (2017). Economic and social political ideology and homophobia: The mediating role of binding and individualizing moral foundations. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0989-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearman, P., & Brückner, H. (2001). Promising the future: Virginity pledges and first intercourse. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 859–912. doi:10.1086/320295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersamin, M. M., Walker, S., Waiters, E. D., Fisher, D. A., & Grube, J. W. (2005). Promising to wait: Virginity pledges and adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 428–436. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.09.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner, H., & Bearman, P. (2005). After the promise: The STD consequences of adolescent virginity pledges. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 271–278. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, E. S., Henderson, J., & Hobson, K. M. (2008). University students’ definitions of sexual abstinence and having sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 665–674. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9289-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, L. M. (2001). The ambiguity of “having sex”: The subjective experience of virginity loss in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research, 38, 127–139. doi:10.1080/00224490109552080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrilch, J. S. (2006). From age of consent laws to the “Silver Ring Thing”: The regulation of adolescent female sexuality. Health Matrix, 16, 151–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006). Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 90–96. doi:10.1363/3809006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., et al. (2012). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385. doi:10.1037/a0021847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116. doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helzer, E. G., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22, 517–522. doi:10.1177/0956797611402514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714–725. doi:10.1080/02699930802110007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarudi, I. N. (2009). Everyday morality and the status quo: Conservative concerns about moral purity, moral evaluations of everyday objects, and moral objections to performance enhancement. Doctoral dissertation. Yale University, New Haven, CT.

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koleva, S., Graham, J., Iyer, Y., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184–194. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landor, A. M., & Simons, L. G. (2014). Why virginity pledges succeed or fail: The moderating effect of religious commitment versus religious participation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 1102–1113. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9769-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2011). From left to right: How the personality system allows basic traits to influence politics via characteristic moral adaptations. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 546–558. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02016.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martino, S. C., Elliott, M. N., Collins, R. L., Kanouse, D. E., & Berry, S. H. (2008). Virginity pledges among the willing: Delays in first intercourse and consistency of condom use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 341–348. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.02.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, A., & Erlandsson, A. (2015). The moral foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 28–32. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, J. E. (2009). Patient teenagers? A comparison of the sexual behavior of virginity pledgers and matched nonpledgers. Pediatrics, 123, e110–e120. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santelli, J. S. (2006). Abstinence-only education: Politics, science, and ethics. Social Research, 73, 835–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelli, J. S., Ott, M. A., Lyon, M., Rogers, J., & Summers, D. (2006). Abstinence-only education policies and programs: A position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 83–87. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein B. (2010, March 27). Health bill restores $250 million in abstinence-education funds. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/26/AR2010032602457.html.

  • Trotter, E. C., & Alderson, K. G. (2007). University students’ definitions of having sex, sexual partner, and virginity loss: The influence of participant gender, sexual experience, and contextual factors. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 16, 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, H., Berman, S., & Cates, W. (2004). Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: Incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 6–10. doi:10.1363/3600604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C. (2011). Battling a ‘sex-saturated society’: The abstinence movement and the politics of sex education. Sexualities, 14, 417–443. doi:10.1177/1363460711406460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S., & Thompson, M. P. (2013). Examining the prospective effects of making a virginity pledge among males across their 4 years of college. Journal of American College Health, 61, 114–120. doi:10.1080/07448481.2012.755188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Barnett.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barnett, M.D., Martin, K.J. & Melugin, P.R. Making and Breaking Abstinence Pledges: Moral Foundations and the Purity Movement. Sexuality & Culture 22, 288–298 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9467-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9467-1

Keywords

Navigation