Abstract
Forming long-term intimate relationships constitutes an important aspect of human nature. Within the context of an evolutionary theoretical framework, the current research has attempted to investigate what motivates people to keep an intimate relationship. Using a combination of qualitative research methods in a sample of 131 Greek-speaking participants, 58 reasons that motivated individuals to keep their intimate relationship were identified. Using quantitative research methods in a sample of 789 Greek-speaking participants who were in an intimate relationship, these reasons were classified in nine broad factors and two broader domains. Having a supporting and compatible partner with whom one shares similar goals, and with whom one has good sex and a strong emotional attachment, were rated among the most important factors motivating participants to keep their relationship. Moreover, as indicated by the domain means, participants were more strongly motivated to keep their intimate relationship if their partners had desirable attributes, such as providing them with support, and less so by their own attributes, such as fear of loneliness. Significant effects of sex, age, marital status, presence of children, and years in a relationship were found for several factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, E. S., & Baucom, D. H. (2006). Dating, marital, and hypothetical extradyadic involvements: how do they compare? The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552330
Amato, P. R., & Previti, D. (2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 602–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03254507
Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton University Press.
Apostolou, M. (2013). Do as we wish: Parental tactics of mate choice manipulation. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F147470491301100404
Apostolou, M. (2014). Sexual selection under parental choice: The evolution of human mating behaviour. Psychology Press.
Apostolou, M. (2017). Why people stay single: An evolutionary perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.034
Apostolou, M. (2021). Plurality in mating: Exploring the occurrence and contingencies of mating strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110689
Apostolou, M., & Panayiotou, R. (2019). The reasons that prevent people from cheating on their partners: An evolutionary account of the propensity not to cheat. Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.041
Apostolou, M., & Papageorgi, I. (2014). Parental mate choice manipulation tactics: Exploring prevalence, sex and personality effects. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 588–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F147470491401200307
Apostolou, M., Constantinou, C., & Anagnostopoulos, S. (2019). Reasons that could lead people to divorce in an evolutionary perspective: Evidence from Cyprus. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 60, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2018.1469333
Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology, 30, 654–676. https://doi.org/10.1086/203798
Boswell, J. (1980). Christianity, social tolerance and homosexuality: Gay people in Western Europe from the beginning of the Christian era to the fourteenth century. The University of Chicago Press.
Bloom, B. L., Niles, R. L., & Tatcher, A. M. (1985). Sources of marital dissatisfaction among newly separated persons. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251385006003007
Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. Temple University Press.
Buss, D. M. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (4th ed.). Basic Books.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round. Alfred A. Knopf.
Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy, or how love conquered marriage. Viking.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
de Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2006). Divorce motives in a period of rising divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0192513X05283982
DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Singled out: How singles are stereotyped, stigmatized, and ignored, and still live happily ever after. St. Martin’s Press.
DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli162&3_01
Dixson, A. F. (2009). Sexual selection and the origins of human mating systems. Oxford University Press.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
Fisher, H. (2017). Anatomy of love: A natural history of mating, marriage, and why we stray. Norton.
Geary, D. C. (2020). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (3rd ed.). American Psychological Association.
Grant, T. J. (2008). Measuring aggregate religiosity in the United States, 1952–2005. Sociological Spectrum, 28, 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170802205973
Gray, P. B. (2013). Evolution and human sexuality. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 152, 94–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22394.
Gray, P. B., & Anderson, K. G. (2010). Fatherhood: Evolution and human paternal behavior. Harvard University Press.
Grych, J. H. (2001). On the origins of fathering: Implications of an evolutionary perspective for understanding links among marriage, divorce, and men’s parenting. Parenting, 1, 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2001.9681211
Harcourt, A. H., Harvey, P. H., Larson, S. G., & Short, R. V. (1981). Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature, 293, 55–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/293055a0
Hawkins, A. J., Willoughby, B. J., & Doherty, W. J. (2012). Reasons for divorce and openness to marital reconciliation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53, 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.682898
Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton, J. N. G. (1989). Hardworking Hadza grandmothers. In V. Standen & R. A. Foley (Eds.), Comparative socioecology: The behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals (pp. 341–366). Blackwell Scientific.
Henrich, J. (2020). The WEIRDest people in the world: How the West became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Hrdy, S. B. (2011). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Harvard University Press.
Hruschka, D. J. (2010). Friendship: Development, ecology, and evolution of a relationship. University of California Press.
Jasienska, G. (2013). The fragile wisdom: An evolutionary view on women's biology and health. Harvard University Press.
Joel, S., MacDonald, G., & Page-Gould, E. (2018). Wanting to stay and wanting to go: Unpacking the content and structure of relationship stay/leave decision processes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722834
Kim, P. S., James, E., Coxworth, J. E., & Hawkes, K. (2012). Increased longevity evolves from grandmothering. Proceeding of the Royal Society B, 279, 4880–4884. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1751
Lancaster, J. B., & Lancaster, C. S. (1987). The watershed: Change in parental investment and family-formation strategies in the course of human evolution. In J. B. Lancaster, J. Altmann, A. S. Rossi, & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), Parenting across the life span: Biosocial dimensions (pp. 187–205). Aldine Publishing.
Machia, L. V., & Ogolsky, B. G. (2020). The reasons people think about staying and leaving their romantic relationships: A mixed-method analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220966903
Mattison, S. M., Quinlan, R. J., & Hare, D. (2019). The expendable male hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374, 20180080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0080
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Wiley.
Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. BCA.
Plavcan, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (1992). Intrasexual competition and canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 87, 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330870407
Scelza, B. A., Prall, S. P., & Starkweather, K. (2020). Paternity confidence and social obligations explain men’s allocations to romantic partners in an experimental giving game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.10.007
Schacht, R., & Kramer, K. L. (2019). Are we monogamous? A review of the evolution of pair-bonding in humans and its contemporary variation cross-culturally. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00230
Tafoya, M. A., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2007). The dark side of infidelity: Its nature, prevalence, and communicative functions. In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 201–242). Erlbaum.
Willner, L. A. (1989). Sexual dimorphism in primates. University of London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
The author has no conflicts of interest to report.
Ethics approval
The current research received ethics approval from the Department of Social Sciences Ethics Committee at the University of Nicosia.
Consent to participate
Consent was asked from all participants prior to participation.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Apostolou, M. Why People Keep an Intimate Relationship. Hum Nat 33, 62–81 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-021-09421-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-021-09421-9