Abstract
Thomas Schelling and Erving Goffman: who influenced whom, when and to what effect? Was there “influence” at all or, as Tom Burns suggests, independent discovery and convergence? These are the questions that this paper is meant to answer. Using available archival material and historical and textual analysis, the paper takes a fresh look at Goffman’s interest in and contribution to game theory. It charts the important first meeting in the late 1950s, their subsequent dialogue through publications, and the critical 1964 conference on “Strategic Interaction and Conflict,” where Goffman encountered an assembly of defense and nuclear strategists associated with the RAND Corporation. These include Daniel Ellsberg, who was a sharp critic of Goffman’s conference presentation, Albert Wohlstetter and, of course, Tom Schelling. During the heated discussion that accompanied Goffman’s presentation, the session chairman gave Goffman the sobriquet sorcerer’s “apprentice.” Ever the ally, Schelling said that he was sympathetic to Goffman’s “style of
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The author is most grateful to Dr. Winkin for sharing this letter (Schelling 1991).
See Schelling (1980 [1960]: 115-16n20, 128n8, and 149n22).
In his survey of sociology and game theory, Richard Swedberg (2001: 315) identifies Jessie Bernard as a “pioneer” in the field and Goffman as someone who had offered “scattered but lively discussions” of game theory in his works.
For a discussion of the conversation that took place during the session on “The Concept of Rationality,” see (Erickson et al. 2013: 16–26).
Goffman’s phrase “massive interdependence” offered an unfortunate echo of John Foster Dulles’s principle of “massive retaliation,” a cornerstone of the Eisenhower-era nuclear strategy that had been rejected by the defense intellectuals attending the 1964 conference. In Strategic Interaction, Goffman (1969: 136) changes the phrase to “full interdependence.”
Balderston’s precise words were, “Can we get Erving to make a magnificent peroration and then have a discussion (Archibald 1966: 208)?
Goffman gave Robert Jervis a prepublication copy of Strategic Interaction and Jervis keeps it in his Columbia University office with his other books by Goffman directly across from his desk. The author thanks Professor Jervis for showing me this and other books in his personal library.
References
Archibald, K. (Ed.). (1966). Strategic Interaction and Conflict: Original Papers and Discussion. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.
Archibald, K. (1968). The utilization of social research and policy analysis. Washington University: Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.
Ayson, R. (2004). Thomas Schelling and the Nuclear Age: Strategy as Social Science. New York: Frank Cass.
Bannister, R. C. (1991). Jessie Bernard: The Making of a Feminist. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Bavelas, A. (1953). Communication Pattern in Task-Oriented Groups. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics (pp. 443–506). Evanston, IL: Paterson.
Bernard, J. (1954). The Theory of Games of Strategy as a Modern Sociology of Conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 59, 411–424.
Burns, T. (1992). Erving Goffman. New York: Routledge.
Collins, R. (1981). Sociology Since Midcentury: Essays in Theory Cumulation. New York: Academic Press.
Ellsberg, D. (2017). The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Erickson, P., et al. (2013). How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Erickson, P. (2015). The World the Game Theorists Made. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gamson, W. (1961). A Theory of Coalition Formation. American Sociological Review, 26, 373–382.
Gamson, W. (1975). The strategy of social protest. New York: Dorsey.
Gamson, W. (2009). “Remembering Erving Goffman: A Stranger Determined to Remain One.” Bios Sociologicus: The Erving Goffman Archives, ed. by Dmitri N. Shalin (UNLV: CDC Publications, 2009).http://cdclv.unlv.edu/archives/interactionism/goffman/gamson_09.html. Accessed 7 Jan 2019
Goffman, E. (1952). On Cooling the Mark Out: Some Aspects of Adaptation to Failure. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 15(4), 451–463.
Goffman, E. (1955). On face work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes., 19(3), 213–231.
Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hoover, J. E. (1970). Letter to Miss Marilyn Sale (January 23). In Mike Keen Papers, Box 7, Folder 7. Special Collections Research Center: University of Chicago Library.
Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2015). The Social Thought of Erving Goffman. London: Sage.
Jaworski, G. D. (2000). Erving Goffman: The Reluctant Apprentice. Symbolic Interaction, 23/3, 299–308.
Kaplan, F. (1983). The Wizards of Armageddon. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Keen, M. (1999). Stalking the Sociological Imagination: J. Edgar Hoover's FBI Surveillance of American Sociology. New York: Praeger.
Milnor, J. (1951). Games Against Nature. September 4. RM-679. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation.
Park, R. E. and E. W. Burgess. (1969 [1921]). Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Roberts, S. (2017). “Morton Deutsch, Expert on Conflict Resolution, Dies at 97. The New York Times (March 21): B15.
Rapoport, A. (1960). Fights, Games and Debates. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sale, M. (1970). Letter to J. Edgar Hoover (January 15). Mike Keen Papers, Box 7, Folder 7, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.
Schelling, T. C. (1958a). “The Reciprocal Fear of Surprise Attack.” P-1342. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation.
Schelling, T. C. (1958b). The Strategy of Conflict: Prospectus for a Reorientation of Game Theory. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 203–264.
Schelling, T. C. (1980 [1960]). The strategy of conflict. Harvard: University of Harvard Press.
Schelling, T. (1991). April 30. Letter to Dr. Yves Winkin.
Schelling, T. (2015). Remembering Erving Goffman. Bios Sociologicus: The Erving Goffman Archives http://cdclv.unlv.edu/archives/interactionism/goffman/schelling_15.html. Accessed 3 Dec 2018
Swedberg, R. (2001). Sociology and Game Theory: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives. Theory and Society, 30, 301–355.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wright, Q., Evan, W. M., & Deutsch, M. (Eds.). (1962). Preventing World War III: Some Proposals. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Yves Winkin and Paul Erickson for encouragement and counsel during formative stages of writing this paper. The author also thanks Robert Ayson for critical reading of the paper and Robert Jervis for sharing his remembrances of Schelling and Goffman during his years at UC Berkeley and Harvard. Material from the Mike Keen Papers is quoted with permission of the Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaworski, G.D. Erving Goffman as Sorcerer’s Apprentice. Am Soc 50, 387–401 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-019-09418-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-019-09418-z