Skip to main content
Log in

Making Claims, Making Problems, Making Morality: Spector and Kitsuse’s Provocation

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Key claims and arguments of the constructionist social problems theory by Malcolm Spector and John Kitsuse are here reviewed. These provocative positions on how best to study social problems and morality in a sociologically recognizable and defensible way, both theoretically and methodologically, are seen as a prime source of the continued interest in and writing from the Spector and Kitsuse formulation over the forty years since its initial publication. The authors considered their proposal “radical,” and retaining its several distinctive recommendations is seen to be a strategy for its continued analytical value and appeal in sociology and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. David Matza (1969, p. 103, p. 116, p. 176) in his Becoming Deviant, shares many theoretical points with these authors, does cite Foucault in three footnotes.

  2. I understand the notion of “related activities,” relative to claims and definitions, to be those that arguably and demonstrably are shaped with and from the meanings that the claims and definitions—the words, most simply—used by participants convey.

  3. While the “and responding activities” is central to their conception of social problems, the initial claims, which must be responded to and carried, or not, are sufficient to garner the attention of the researcher using this argument.

  4. Such a position or location in the sociological study of what has been called social problems seems always to have been a point of contention in US sociology. It is easily seen as too distance, too cool, too removed, too safe, too professional, and so on; even perhaps “too conservative.” This is still the case.

  5. Oxford English Dictionary, online, consulted June 22, 2018 at: oed.com.cowles-proxy.drake.edu/view/Entry/155203?redirectedFrom = Putative#eid.

References

  • Becker, H. S. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14, 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1973). [1963]. Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1986). Doing things together: Selected papers. Evanston: Northwestern. University Press.

  • Best, J. (1989). Afterword. Extending the constructionist perspective: A conclusion and an introduction. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. 243–250). New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A., & J. I. Kitsuse. (1963). Educational decision-makers. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

  • Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. T. (1994). Feminist thought. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. T. (2000). Autoaffection: Unconscious thought in the age of teletechnology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology, trans. Gayatri Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, vol. 1. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood cliffs. Prentice-Hall.

  • Haraway, D. J. (1997). “Modest_witness@second_millennium.” In Modest_witness@second_millennium. Femaleman©_meets_OncoMouse™. Feminism and technoscience (pp. 23–48). New York: Routledge.

  • Hazelrigg, L. E. (1985). Were it not for words. Social Problems, 32, 234–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, J. A., & Miller, G. (Eds.). (1993). Reconsidering constructionism: Debates in social problems theory. Hawthorne. Aldine.

  • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of constructionist research. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, P. R., & J. I. Kitsuse. (1993). “Vernacular constituents of moral discourse: An interactionist proposal for the study of social problems.” in J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering constructionism: Debates in social problems theory (pp. 25–58). Hawthorne: Aldine.

  • Kitsuse, J. I. (1962). Societal reaction to deviant behavior. Social Problems, 9, 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2003). The promises of constructivism. In D. Ihde & E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience (pp. 27–46). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). [1979]. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (2005). Social studies of science. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory (Vol. 2, pp. 760–764). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (Eds.). (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D. (1969). Becoming deviant. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 904–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, S. (1985). Toward a sociological deconstruction of social problems. Social Problems, 32, 228–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollner, M. (1974). “Sociological and commonsense models of the labeling process.” In R. Turner (Ed.). Ethnomethodology (pp. 27–40). Hammondsworth: Penguin.

  • Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rains, P. (1975). Imputations of deviance: A retrospective essay on the labeling perspective. Social Problems, 23, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. (1985). Defining the definitional perspective on social problems. Social Problems, 32, 232–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. (2018). The challenges of conceptualizing social problems. In A. J. Treviño (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of social problems (Vol. 1, pp. 3–22). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (2000). [1977]. Constructing social problems. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, G. W. (Ed.). (1983). Observers observed: Essays on ethnographic fieldwork. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, A. J. (Ed.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of social problems, volumes 1 & 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The very idea. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S., & Pawluch, D. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. Social Problems, 32, 214–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Schneider.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneider, J. Making Claims, Making Problems, Making Morality: Spector and Kitsuse’s Provocation. Am Soc 50, 182–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9390-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9390-4

Keywords

Navigation