Abstract
Key claims and arguments of the constructionist social problems theory by Malcolm Spector and John Kitsuse are here reviewed. These provocative positions on how best to study social problems and morality in a sociologically recognizable and defensible way, both theoretically and methodologically, are seen as a prime source of the continued interest in and writing from the Spector and Kitsuse formulation over the forty years since its initial publication. The authors considered their proposal “radical,” and retaining its several distinctive recommendations is seen to be a strategy for its continued analytical value and appeal in sociology and beyond.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
David Matza (1969, p. 103, p. 116, p. 176) in his Becoming Deviant, shares many theoretical points with these authors, does cite Foucault in three footnotes.
I understand the notion of “related activities,” relative to claims and definitions, to be those that arguably and demonstrably are shaped with and from the meanings that the claims and definitions—the words, most simply—used by participants convey.
While the “and responding activities” is central to their conception of social problems, the initial claims, which must be responded to and carried, or not, are sufficient to garner the attention of the researcher using this argument.
Such a position or location in the sociological study of what has been called social problems seems always to have been a point of contention in US sociology. It is easily seen as too distance, too cool, too removed, too safe, too professional, and so on; even perhaps “too conservative.” This is still the case.
Oxford English Dictionary, online, consulted June 22, 2018 at: oed.com.cowles-proxy.drake.edu/view/Entry/155203?redirectedFrom = Putative#eid.
References
Becker, H. S. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14, 239–247.
Becker, H. S. (1973). [1963]. Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
Becker, H. S. (1986). Doing things together: Selected papers. Evanston: Northwestern. University Press.
Best, J. (1989). Afterword. Extending the constructionist perspective: A conclusion and an introduction. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. 243–250). New York: Aldine.
Cicourel, A., & J. I. Kitsuse. (1963). Educational decision-makers. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clough, P. T. (1994). Feminist thought. New York: Blackwell.
Clough, P. T. (2000). Autoaffection: Unconscious thought in the age of teletechnology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology, trans. Gayatri Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, vol. 1. New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood cliffs. Prentice-Hall.
Haraway, D. J. (1997). “Modest_witness@second_millennium.” In Modest_witness@second_millennium. Femaleman©_meets_OncoMouse™. Feminism and technoscience (pp. 23–48). New York: Routledge.
Hazelrigg, L. E. (1985). Were it not for words. Social Problems, 32, 234–237.
Holstein, J. A., & Miller, G. (Eds.). (1993). Reconsidering constructionism: Debates in social problems theory. Hawthorne. Aldine.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of constructionist research. New York: Guilford.
Ibarra, P. R., & J. I. Kitsuse. (1993). “Vernacular constituents of moral discourse: An interactionist proposal for the study of social problems.” in J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering constructionism: Debates in social problems theory (pp. 25–58). Hawthorne: Aldine.
Kitsuse, J. I. (1962). Societal reaction to deviant behavior. Social Problems, 9, 247–256.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2003). The promises of constructivism. In D. Ihde & E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience (pp. 27–46). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). [1979]. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lynch, M. (2005). Social studies of science. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory (Vol. 2, pp. 760–764). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (Eds.). (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Matza, D. (1969). Becoming deviant. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 904–913.
Pfohl, S. (1985). Toward a sociological deconstruction of social problems. Social Problems, 32, 228–232.
Pollner, M. (1974). “Sociological and commonsense models of the labeling process.” In R. Turner (Ed.). Ethnomethodology (pp. 27–40). Hammondsworth: Penguin.
Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rains, P. (1975). Imputations of deviance: A retrospective essay on the labeling perspective. Social Problems, 23, 1–11.
Schneider, J. (1985). Defining the definitional perspective on social problems. Social Problems, 32, 232–234.
Schneider, J. (2018). The challenges of conceptualizing social problems. In A. J. Treviño (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of social problems (Vol. 1, pp. 3–22). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (2000). [1977]. Constructing social problems. New York: Routledge.
Stocking, G. W. (Ed.). (1983). Observers observed: Essays on ethnographic fieldwork. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Treviño, A. J. (Ed.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of social problems, volumes 1 & 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The very idea. London: Tavistock.
Woolgar, S., & Pawluch, D. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. Social Problems, 32, 214–227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schneider, J. Making Claims, Making Problems, Making Morality: Spector and Kitsuse’s Provocation. Am Soc 50, 182–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9390-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9390-4