Abstract
This study compared the characteristics and court-ordered evaluation questions and responses among 4,430 defendants to determine if differences existed between those represented by public defenders and private attorneys when receiving trial competency or responsibility psychiatric evaluations from a state department of mental health. Defendants represented by public defenders were more likely to be younger, to have less education, to have psychotic disorders, to have a history of inpatient psychiatric treatment, to live in urban or rural counties, and to be jailed at the time of the evaluation. In addition, defendants represented by public defenders were less likely to have a request for a criminal responsibility evaluation and more likely to be evaluated as having a mental illness, to be incompetent to stand trial, and to need hospitalization pending trial. Consideration of whether defendants with public defenders receiving less requests for responsibility evaluations was indicative of a therapeutic jurisprudence approach is discussed. Implications for research on types of legal representation of defendants with mental illness are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68; 105 S.Ct. 1087; 84 L.Ed.2d 53;1985 U.S. Lexis 52; 53 U.S.L.W. 4179 (1985).
American Bar Association. (2016). American Bar Association Criminal Justice Standards on Mental Health (4th ed.). Chapter 7. Chicago: American Bar Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson, J., & Heaton, P. (2012). How much difference does the lawyer make? The effect of defense council on murder case outcomes. The Yale Law Journal, 122(1), 154–187.
Barber-Rioja, V., & Rotter, M. (2014). A therapeutic approach to jurisprudence: A differential thinking model of sanctions and rewards. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13, 272–278.
Baron, R. C., & Salzer, M. S. (2002). Accounting for unemployment among people with mental illness. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 585–599.
Bayless, C. M., & Polk, O. E. (2005). Attorneys’ self-reported perspectives and criteria for requesting competency evaluations in criminal defense cases. Criminal Justice Review, 30(3), 312–324.
Berman, L. M., & Osborne, Y. H. (1987). Attorneys’ referrals for competency to stand trial evaluations: Comparisons of referred and nonreferred clients. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 5(3), 373–380.
Brakel, S. J. (1988). After the verdict: Dispositional decisions regarding criminal defendants acquitted by reason of insanity. DePaul Law Review, 37(2), 181–258.
Cohen, T. H. (2014). Who is better at defending criminals? Does type of defense attorney matter in terms of producing favorable case outcomes. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(1), 29–58.
Cooper, V. G., & Zapf, P. A. (2003). Predictor variables in competency to stand trial decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 27(4), 423–436.
Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402; 80 S.Ct. 788; 4 L.Ed.2d 824; 1960 U.S. Lexis 1307 (1960).
Feeney, F., & Jackson, P. G. (1991). Public defenders, assigned counsel, retained counsel: Does the type of criminal defense counsel matter? Rutgers Law Journal, 22(2), 361–456.
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; 83 S.Ct. 792; 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963); 5951 U.S. Lexis 1942; 23 Ohio Op.2d 258; 93 A.L.R.2d 733.
Gould, K. A. (1995). A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of competency evaluation requests: The defense attorney’s dilemma. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18(1), 83–100.
Harlow, C. W. (2000). Defense counsel in criminal cases (NCJ 179023). Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics: U.S. Department of Justice.
Hartley, R. D., Miller, H. V., & Spohn, C. (2010). Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1063–1070.
Hoffman, M. B., Rubin, P. H., & Shepherd, J. M. (2005). An empirical study of public defender effectiveness: Self-selection by the “marginally indigent”. The Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 3, 223–255.
Hoge, S. K., Bonnie, R. J., Poythress, N., & Monahan, J. (1992). Attorney-client decision-making in criminal cases: Client competence and participation as perceived by their attorneys. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 385–394.
Hudson, C. G. (2005). Socioeconomic status and mental illness: Tests of the social causation and selection hypotheses. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(1), 3–18.
King, M., & Wexler, D. (2010). Therapeutic jurisprudence. In J. M. Brown & E. A. Campbell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 126–132). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kois, L., Pearson, J., Chauhan, P., Goni, M., & Saraydarian, L. (2013). Competency to stand trial among female inpatients. Law and Human Behavior, 37(4), 231–240.
Langton, L., & Farole, D., Jr. (2009). Public defender offices, 2007 – Statistical tables (NCJ 228538). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Revised June 17, 2010.
Liang, B., Long, M. A., & Brame, W. (2012). Is it legal representation or clients? An empirical testing of clients’ performance and their legal representation in Tulsa County drug and DUI programs. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 544–561.
Linhorst, D. M. (1997). The impact of system design on the characteristics of Missouri’s insanity acquittees. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25(4), 509–529.
McWilliams v. Dunn, 582 U.S. ___(2017); 137 S.Ct. 1240; 197 L.Ed.2d 461; 2017 U.S. Lexis 1693; 85 U.S.L.W. 3415.
Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York: Gilford Press.
Missouri Revised Statutes (2015). Chapter 552: Criminal Proceeding Involving Mental Illness.
Office of State Courts Administrator. (2015). 2015 Criminal Cases Annual Report. Retrieved December 3, 2017 from https://www.courts.mo.gov/page.jsp?id=96462.
Owens, S. D., Accetta, E., Charles, J. J., & Shoemaker, S. E. (2014). Indigent defense services in the United States, FY2008–2012 (NCJ 246683). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Packer, I. K. (2009). Evaluation of criminal responsibly. New York: Oxford University Press.
Parks, J., Radke, A. Q., & Haupt, M. B. (2014). The vital role of state psychiatric hospitals. Alexandria: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Medical Directors Council.
Perlin, M. L. (1996). Myths, realities, and the political world: The anthropology of insanity defense attitudes. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 24(1), 5–26.
Perlin, M. L. (2010). “Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity”: Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 475–481.
Redlich, A. D., Steadman, H. J., Robbins, P. C., & Swanson, J. W. (2006). Use of the criminal justice system to leverage mental health treatment: Effects on treatment adherence and satisfaction. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 34, 292–299.
Roach, M. A. (2014). Indigent defense counsel, attorney quality, and defendant outcomes. American Law and Economics Review, 16(2), 577–619.
Ross, J. (1998). Autonomy versus a client’s best interests: The defense lawyer’s dilemma when mentally ill clients seek to control their defense. American Criminal Law Review, 35, 1343–1347.
State of Missouri Public Defender Commission. (2015). Fiscal year 2015 Annual Report Retrieved December 3, 2017 from https://archive.org/details/2015MOPublicDefenderAnnRpt.
Steadman, H. J., McGreevy, M. A., Morrissey, J. P., Callahan, L. A., Robbins, P. C., & Cirincione, C. (1993). Before and after Hinckley: Evaluating insanity defense reform. New York: Guilford Press.
Strong, S. M., Rantala, R. R., & Kyckelhahn, T. (2016). Census of problem-solving courts, 2012 (NCJ 249803). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
Wexler, D. B. (2005). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the rehabilitative role of the criminal defense lawyer. St. Thomas Law Review, 17(3), 743–774.
Wexler, D. B. (2006). Therapeutic jurisprudence. In A. Taylor (Ed.), Justice as a basic human need (pp. 61–69). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Wiener, R. L., & Brank, E. M. (2013). Problem solving courts: Social science and legal perspectives. New York: Springer.
Williams, M. R. (2002). A comparison of sentencing outcomes for defendants with public defenders versus retained counsel in a Florida circuit court. Justice System Journal, 23(2), 249–257.
Williams, M. R. (2013). The effectiveness of public defenders in four Florida counties. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 205–212.
Williams v. State of Missouri, 254 S.W.3d 70 (Mo.Ct.App. 2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Linhorst, D.M., Ann Dirks-Linhorst, P., McGraugh, S. et al. A Comparison of Defendants with Mental Illness Represented by Public Defenders and Private Attorneys: an Analysis of Court-Ordered Pretrial Psychiatric Evaluations. Am J Crim Just 43, 810–830 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9430-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9430-6