Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Politics in Punishment: the Effect of the State Attorney Election Cycle on Conviction and Sentencing Outcomes in Florida

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While a considerable amount of research recognizes a link between politics and criminal justice administration and policy, minimal literature is concerned with the impact of election cycles on punishment outcomes. Recent studies find incarceration is used as a tool for gaining political power. Therefore, the election period, especially when the incumbent faces opposition, could have a substantial effect on sentencing outcomes. Previous research has examined this phenomenon on a national and state level, but has rarely considered local political influences on elections. In this study, we examine the effect of local state attorney elections on punitiveness in punishment decisions, specifically through filing rates, conviction rates, prison admission rates, and average prison sentence lengths. As it is well established that criminal justice sanctions disproportionately affect minorities, we also examine the potential amplification of this disparity during the election cycle. A fixed-effects panel design was used to assess the effect of the State Attorney election periods in Florida and the presence of an electoral opponent on conviction and sentencing outcomes from 1995 to 2010. The results lend partial support to the hypothesis that the election cycle affects criminal justice outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A., & Sachs, J. (1988). Political parties and the business cycle in the United States, 1948–1984. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 20(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspin, L. T., & Hall, W. K. (1994). Retention election and judicial behavior. Judicature, 77, 306–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, A., & McCannon, B. C. (2014). The effect of the election of prosecutors on criminal trials. Public Choice, 161, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, A., & McCannon, B. C. (2015). Prosecutorial retention: Signaling by trial. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 17(2), 219–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, E. P. (2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 231–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, K. (1997). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary politics. New York: Oxford University Press

  • Berdejó, C., & Yuchtman, N. (2013). Crime, punishment, and politics: An analysis of political cycle in criminal sentencing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 741–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 769–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalcok, H. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority group relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, R. T. (2005). What do prosecutors maximize? Evidence from the careers of U.S. attorneys. American Law and Economics Review, 7(2), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. R. W., & Raphael, S. (2003). Life terms or death sentences: The uneasy relationship between judicial elections and capital punishment. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 92, 609–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, J. T., & Burgos, G. (2012). Sentencing juvenile offenders to life in prison: The political sociology of juvenile punishment. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 602–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. Criminal Justice, 3, 299-370.

  • Drazen, A. (2001). The political business cycle after 25 Years. In B. S. Bernake & K. Rogoff (Eds.), NBER macroeconomics annual 2000 (Vol. 15, pp. 75–138). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyke, A. (2007). Electoral cycle in the administration of criminal justice. Public Choice, 133, 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigations. (2012). Uniform crime report, crime in the United States, 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Retrieved August 10, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Division of Elections (2013) Florida Department of State. Available at http://dos.myflorida.com/elections. Accessed 1 April 2013.

  • Garland, D. (2001). Mass imprisonment: Social causes and consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, D. G., & Poterba, J. M. (1980). The price of popularity: The political business cycle reexamined. American Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 696–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. C., & Huber, G. A. (2002). Citizen oversight and the electoral incentives of criminal prosecutors. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 334–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. C., & Huber, G. A. (2007). The effect of electoral competitiveness on incumbent behavior. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. A., & Gordon, S. C. (2004). Accountability and coercion: Is justice blind when it runs for office? American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., & Britt, D. (1979). Inequality and police use of deadly force: An empirical assessment of a conflict hypothesis. Social Problems, 403–412.

  • Jacobs, D., & Carmichael, J. T. (2001). The politics of punishment across time and space: A pooled time-series analysis of imprisonment rates. Social Forces, 80(1), 61–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., & Helms, R. E. (1996). Toward a political model of incarceration: A time-series examination of multiple explanations for prison admission rates. American Journal of Sociology, 102(2), 323–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., & Kent, S. L. (2007). The determinants of executions since 1951: How politics, protest, public opinion, and social divisions shape capital punishment. Social Problems, 54(3), 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., Carmichael, J. T., & Kent, S. L. (2005). Vigilantism, current racial threat, and death sentences. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 656–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. D. (2005). Contextual disparities in guidelines departures: Courtroom social contexts, guidelines compliance, and extralegal disparities in criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43(3), 761–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klose, J. (2012). Political business cycles and monetary policy revisited—An application of two-dimensional asymmetric Taylor reaction function. International Economics and Economic Policy, 9, 265–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubik, J. D., & Moran, J. R. (2003). Lethal elections: Gubinatorial politics and the timing of executions. Journal of Law and Economics, 46(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. (1997). Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effects of police on crime. The American Economic Review, 87(3), 270–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. S. H. (2013). Preferences and incentives of appointed and elected public officials: Evidence from state trial court judges. American Economic Review, 103(4), 1360–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. E. (1992). Social threat and social control. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B. T. (1978). The political business cycle: An empirical test. Southern Economic Journal, 44(3), 504–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCannon, B. C. (2013). Prosecutor elections, mistakes, and appeals. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10(4), 696–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P., Cochran, J. C., & Lindsey, A. M. (2016). Offending and racial and ethnic disparities in criminal justice: A conceptual framework for guiding theory and research and informing policy. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(1), 78–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. H. (2016). The impact of judicial elections in the sentencing of black crime. Journal of Human Resources. doi:10.3368/jhr.52.4.0415-7057R1.

  • Poterba, J. M. (1994). State responses to fiscal crises: The effects of budgetary institutions and politics. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 799-821.

  • Public Opinion Strategies. (2010). National Research of public attitudes on crime and punishment. Colorado: Pew Center on the States Retrieved October 5, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. A. (1995). The politics of the political business cycle. British Journal of Political Science, 25, 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengae Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, B., & Johnston, E. (2004). Examining public opinion about crime and justice: A statewide study. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(3), 270–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. B. (2004). The politics of punishment: Evaluating political explanations of incarceration rates. The Journal of Politics, 66(3), 925–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolzenberg, L., D’Alessio, S. J., & Eitle, D. (2013). Race and cumulative discrimination in the prosecution of criminal defendants. Race and Justice, 3(4), 275–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stucky, T. D., Heimer, K., & Lang, J. B. (2005). Partisan politics, electoral competition and imprisonment: An analysis of states over time. Criminology, 43(1), 211–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. (1999). Why are U.S. incarceration rates so high? Crime & Delinquency, 45(4), 419–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2010). The social sources of Americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology, 48(1), 99–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. F. (2009). How prosecutor elections fail us. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6(2), 649–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J., & Fording, R. (2005). Politics and state punitiveness in black and white. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1099–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa R. Nadel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nadel, M.R., Scaggs, S.J.A. & Bales, W.D. Politics in Punishment: the Effect of the State Attorney Election Cycle on Conviction and Sentencing Outcomes in Florida. Am J Crim Just 42, 845–862 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9388-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9388-4

Keywords

Navigation