Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of Normal Saline Nasal Spray Added to Standard Treatment Regimen of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic Rhinosinusitis is characterized by inflammation of lining of nose and paranasal sinuses leading to nasal blockage/discharge, facial pressure/pain and loss of smell sensation, generally treated with medical therapy initially. Nasal saline irrigation is one of the treatment modalities commonly used to improve symptoms. The aim was to evaluate efficacy of adding normal saline nasal spray to standard treatment regimen of chronic rhinosinusitis. A randomized, controlled, single blinded study with 40 chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Study group was prescribed Normal Saline nasal spray (1 puff in each nostril, thrice daily) along with topical corticosteroids (Mometasone furoate nasal spray, 1 puff in each nostril, twice daily; 1 puff = 50 µg), and oral antibiotics (Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid, 30 mg/kg, twice daily), and the control group was only prescribed topical corticosteroids and oral antibiotics. Patients were evaluated using Lund–Kennedy endoscopic scores and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test before and after treatment. There was a significant improvement in LKES, with pre-treatment and post-treatment scores for control group being 5.35 ± 2.43 vs 3.70 ± 1.95 respectively (p = 0.0116), whereas for test group, pre-treatment and post-treatment scores were 8.15 ± 2.62 vs 6.05 ± 2.04 respectively (p = 0.0037). Improvement in SNOT-22 scores were observed as well, with pre-treatment and post-treatment scores for control group being 38.90 ± 12.01 vs 25.70 ± 9.21 respectively (p = 0.0002), whereas for test group, pre-treatment and post-treatment scores were 49.85 ± 11.38 vs 31.55 ± 9.91 respectively (p < 0.0001). The study suggests that there is additional benefit in usage of normal saline in form of symptomatic relief as well as clinical improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watkinson J, Clarke R (2018) Scott-Brown’s otorhinolaryngology, head & neck surgery,8th edn, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1025–1069

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith TL, Kern R, Palmer JN, Schlosser R, Chandra RK, Chiu AG, Conley D, Mace JC, Fu RF, Stankiewicz J (2013) Medical therapy vs surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, multi-institutional study with 1-year follow-up. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 3(1):4–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hauptmann G, Ryan MW (2007) The effect of saline solutions on nasal patency and mucociliary clearance in rhinosinusitis patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:815–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paventhan K, Pradeep KR, Ramyashree C (2020) Comparison of nasal douching with isotonic saline versus Ringer lactate in chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 6:1064–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang A, Govindaraj S (2013) Topical therapy in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 21(1):31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Low TH, Woods CM, Ullah S, Carney AS (2014) A double-blind randomized controlled trial of normal saline, lactated Ringer’s and hypertonic saline nasal irrigation solution after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 28(3):225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith TL, Litvack JR, Hwang PH, Loehrl TA, Mace JC, Fong KJ et al (2010) Determinants of outcomes of sinus surgery: a multi-institutional prospective cohort study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery Official J Am Acad Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 142:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Psaltis AJ, Li G, Vaezeafshar R, Cho KS, Hwang PH (2014) Modification of the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scoring system improves its reliability and correlation with patient-reported outcome measures. Laryngoscope 124(10):2216–2223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Orlandi RR, Kingdom TT, Hwang PH (2016) International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis executive summary. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6(suppl 1):S3–S21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chong LY, Head K, Hopkins C et al (2016) Saline irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD011995.

  11. Kanjanawasee D, Seresirikachorn K, Chitsuthipakorn W, Snidvongs K (2018) Hypertonic saline versus isotonic saline nasal irrigation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 32:269–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonnomet A, Luczka E, Coraux C, de Gabory L (2016) Nondiluted seawater enhances nasal ciliary beat frequency and wound repair speed compared to diluted seawater and normal saline. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6:1062–1068

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Woods CM, Tan S, Ullah S, Frauenfelder C, Ooi EH, Carney AS (2015) The effect of nasal irrigation formulation on the antimicrobial activity of nasal secretions. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 5:1104–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by AJ. The first draft of manuscript was written by AJ. Review and guidance were provided by PHP and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anubhuti Janwade.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the institute.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janwade, A., Patil, P.H., Ankle, N.R. et al. Efficacy of Normal Saline Nasal Spray Added to Standard Treatment Regimen of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75, 3453–3456 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03990-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03990-0

Keywords

Navigation