Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Study of Complications Associated with Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 02 June 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Tonsillectomy is one of the most common ear, nose and throat surgical procedure, carried out worldwide1. Amongst the various method of tonsillectomy (diathermy, laser, harmonic scalpel, radiofrequency cautery cryosurgery and coblation), dissection and snare method is commonest procedure done by otorhinolaryngologist. To compare the post operative complications associated with coblation versus conventional cold-dissection steel tonsillectomy. We carried out the prospective study of complications associated with coblation versus conventional cold steel tonsillectomy in postoperative pain, anesthesia, hemorrhage, fever, pharyngitis, injury of adjacent structure & cautery burn. Average blood loss on Coblation side was 18.74 ml while on conventional side it was 44.2 ml. Post operative pain score, injury to adjacent structure and cautery burn were found to be significantly decreased in coblation. No such difference was observed in pharyngitis and fever in both methods. The use of coblator reduces the post-operative pain, peri or post-operative blood loss, injury to adjacent structure & cautery burn too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Wiatrak BJ, Woollley AL (2005) Pharyngitis and adenotonsillar diseases. In: Cummings CW, Flint PW, Harker LA, Haughey BH, Richardson MA, Robbins KT (eds) Cummings otolaryngology; head and neck surgery, 4th edn. Elsevier, Mosby, Baltimore, pp 4135–4165

  2. Pang YT (1995) Paediatric tonsillectomy: bipolar electro dissection and dissection/snare compared. J Laryngol Otol 109(8):733–736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paramasivam VK et al (2012) Randomised comparative study of adenotonsillectomy by conventional and coblation method for children with obstructive sleep apnea. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(6):816–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman M, Losavio P, Ibrahim H, Ramakrishnan V (2003) Radiofrequency tonsil reduction; safety, morbidity and efficacy. Laryngoscope 113:882887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vangelin G, et al (2012) Meta analysis of intra operative blood loss various methods of tonsillectomy, pp 12–14

  6. Hong SM, et al (2013) Coblation tonsillectomy in pediatric patients, pp 22–28

  7. Omrani M, Barati B, Omidifar N, Okhovvat AR, Hashemi SA (2012) Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: a double blind randomized controlled trial. J res med sci 17:45–50

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Parsf Sukesh ons SP, Cordes SR, Comer B (2006) Comparison of post-tonsillectomy pain using the ultrasonic scalpel, coblator, and electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head neck surg 134:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Eredita R, Bozzola L (2009) Molecular resonance versus coblation tonsillectomy in children. Laryngoscope. 10: 1897–1901

  10. Hong SM, Cho JG, Chae SW, Lee HM, Woo JS (2013) Coblation versus electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective randomized study comparing clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults. Clin exp otorhinolaryngol 6(2):90–93

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim NG, Oh HM, Kim JY, Kim DW, Kim WH, Choi DJ (2013) Comparison of tonsillectomy by conventional dissection electrocautery laser and coblation. Korean J otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 56(12):773–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, Micheal gleason, George G Browning, J Burton Scott Browns (2013) Otorhinolaryngology and neck surgery, 7th ed, 2: 1998 47

  13. Mitic S, Tvinnereim M, Lie E, Saltyte BJ (2007) A pilot randomized controlled trial of coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy hemostasis. Clin otolaryngol 32(4):261–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roje Z, Racic G, Dogas Z, Pisac VP, Timms M (2009) Postoperative morbidity and histopathologic characteristics of tonsillar tissue following coblation tonsillectomy in children: a prospective randomized single blind study. Coll Anthropol 33(1):293–298

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J, Liu D, Huang Z, Zhong J, Tan Z, Qiu S (2009) Low temperature coblation assisted versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy in surgeries for children. Lin Chaung Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi J clin otolaryngol 23(15):690–692

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parker D, Howe L, Unsworth V, Hilliam R (2009) A randomized controlled trial to compare postoperative pain in children undergoing tonsillectomy using cold steel dissection with bipolar hemostasis versus coblation technique. Clin otolaryngol 34(3):225–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhattacharya N, Shapiro NL (2014) Associations between socioeconomic status and race with complications after tonsillectomy in children. Pediatr otolaryngol 151:1055–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roje Z, Racic G, Kardum G, Selimovic M (2011) Is the systemic inflammatory reaction to surgery responsible for postoperative pain after tonsillectomy and is it technique related? Wien Klin Wochenschr 123:479–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eredita RD (2010) Tonsillectomy in children: a five factor analysis among three techniques -reporting upon clinical results, anesthesia time, surgery time, bleeding and cost. Laryngoscope 120(12):2502–2507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashvanee Kumar Chaudhary.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed written consent was taken from patients participating in the study.

Consent for Publication

The current work is neither submitted nor published anywhere.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaudhary, K., Singh, V., Yadav, R. et al. Comparative Study of Complications Associated with Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75, 2870–2877 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03872-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03872-5

Keywords

Navigation