Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An E-Survey of Current Voice Therapy Practices Amongst Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) in India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In India, Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) generally work with ENT surgeons and use a variety of treatment approaches, service delivery methods, feedback modes, and outcome measures in clinical practice while dealing with voice disorders. The practice preferences of the SLPs are based on theoretical and practical exposure during their graduate course, guidance from professional bodies, evidence-based practices, etc. The facilities in the work setting also determine the practice style of the SLP. This study reports information on demographics of the SLPs, nature of patients served, intervention methods, and evidence-based practices followed by the SLPs via an E-survey. Analysis of the survey from 55 SLPs in India, who work in the area of voice revealed that most SLPs had postgraduate (67.27%; n = 37) and doctorate degree (23.63%; n = 13) and worked in medical-related settings (81.81%; n = 45). Therapeutic approaches were practiced as stated in literature by 43.64% (n = 24) of SLPs. Although 56.36% (n = 31) of SLPs modified therapeutic approaches based on the client’s needs (75%), literacy (16.66%) and cultural variations (8.33%). Attending Continuing Education Programs and training workshops were required to practice voice. Voice therapy methods (protocols) used by the SLPs were not uniform across India. The development of an indigenous protocol/method for voice therapy is the need of the hour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boominathan P (2016) Expanding frontiers in voice health & care-applications for India. J AIISH 1(35):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boominathan P, Desai V (2012) Synergy between speech language pathologists and ENT surgeons to promote patient care. J Laryngol Voice 2(2):51–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yiu EM, Abbott KV, Ma EP (2007) Application of the ICF in voice disorders. Semin Speech Lang 28(4):343–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boominathan P, Rajendran A, Nagarajan R, Seethapathy J, Gnanasekar M (2008) Vocal abuse and vocal hygiene practices among different level professional voice users in India: a survey. Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear 11(1):47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal AK, Singh JV, Agarwal M (2009) Prevalence of disability in India-An update. Indian J Commun Health 21(1):56–63

    Google Scholar 

  6. Behrman A (2005) Common practices of voice therapists in the evaluation of patients. J Voice 19(3):454–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zipoli RP Jr, Kennedy M (2005) Evidence-based practice among speech-language pathologists. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 14(3):208–220. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2005/021)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2016) Scope of practice in speech-language pathology [Scope of Practice]. https://www.asha.org/policy. Accessed 4 Apr 2020

  9. Speech-Language and Audiology Canada (2016) Scope of practice for speech-language pathology. Retrieved from https://www.sac-oac.ca/sites/default/files/resources/scope_of_practice_speech-language_pathology_en.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2020

  10. Speech Pathology Association of Australia (2010) Speech Pathology Australia: Code of Ethics. Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited

  11. Royal College of Speech Language Therapists (2006) Communicating Quality 3: RCSLT’s guidance on best practice in service organisation and provision. http://www.rcslt.org/speech_and_language_therapy/standards/CQ3_pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2020

  12. Rehabilitation Council of India (2015) Scope of practice in audiology and speech language pathology. https://www.ishaindia.org.in/pdf/Scope-of-Practice-Documents_Feb2016_nocvrpage.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2020

  13. Patel RR, Awan SN, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Courey M, Deliyski D, Eadie T, Paul D, Švec JG, Hillman R (2018) Recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association expert panel to develop a protocol for instrumental assessment of vocal function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 27(3):887–905. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Crevier-Buchman L, Friedrich G, Van De Heyning P, Remacle M, Woisard V (2001) A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258(2):77–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050000299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boominathan P, Samuel J, Arunachalam R, Nagarajan R, Mahalingam S (2014) Multi parametric voice assessment: Sri Ramachandra University protocol. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66(1):246–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0460-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Banu F (2014) Common clinical practices of Speech Language Pathologists in India for Evaluating Voice Disorders. Master’s dissertation. Chennai, India: Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU)

  17. Boersma P, Weenink D (2020) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.10. http://www.praat.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-9748.106977. Accessed 23 March 2020

  18. Kempster GB, Gerratt BR, Abbott KV, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Hillman RE (2009) Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 18(2):124–132. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirano M (1981) GRBAS scale for evaluating the hoarse voice & frequency range of phonation. Clin Exam Voice 5:83–84

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson DK (1987) Voice problems of children, 3rd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  21. Konnai RM, Jayaram M, Scherer RC (2010) Development and validation of a voice disorder outcome profile for an Indian population. J Voice 24(2):206–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahalingam S, Boominathan P, Subramaniyan B (2014) Voice disorder outcome profile (V-DOP)—translation and validation in Tamil language. J Voice 28(6):841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson G, Benninger MS, Newman CW (1997) The voice handicap index (VHI) development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 6(3):66–70. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nanjundeswaran C, Jacobson BH, Gartner-Schmidt J, Abbott KV (2015) Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI): development and validation. J Voice 29(4):433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Srinivas S, Mahalingam S, Boominathan P (2020) Cultural and linguistic adaptation of vocal fatigue index for tamil-speaking population (VFI-T). J Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Mersbergen M, Ostrem J, Titze IR (2001) Preparation of the speech-languagepathologist specializing in voice: an educational survey. J Voice 15(2):237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(01)00024-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Litts JK, Abaza MM (2017) Does a multidisciplinary approach to voice and swallowing disorders improve therapy adherence and outcomes? Laryngosc 127(11):2446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen SM, Garrett CG (2007) Utility of voice therapy in the management of vocal fold polyps and cysts. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136(5):742–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leonard R (2009) Voice therapy and vocal nodules in adults. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17(6):453–457. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283317fd2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Culton GL, Gerwin JM (1998) Current trends in laryngectomy rehabilitation: a survey of speech-language pathologists. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118(4):458–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459989811800405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hancock A, Haskin G (2015) Speech-language pathologists’ knowledge and attitudes regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) populations. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 24(2):206–221. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Davies S, Goldberg JM (2006) Clinical aspects of transgender speech feminization and masculinization. Int J Transgend 9(3–4):167–196. https://doi.org/10.1300/J485v09n03_08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sataloff RT (2017) Professional voice: the science and art of clinical care, 3-volume set. Plural Publishing, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schneider SL, Sataloff RT (2007) Voice therapy for the professional voice. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 40(5):1133–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2007.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Theodoros DG (2008) Telerehabilitation for service delivery in speech-language pathology. J Telemed Telecare 14(5):221–224. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2007.007044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Burgess LP, Holtel MR, Syms MJ, Birkmire-Peters DP, Peters LJ, Mashima PA (1999) Overview of telemedicine applications for otolaryngology. Laryngosc 109(9):1433–1437. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199909000-00014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mashima PA (2011) The use of video-teleconferencing to deliver voice therapy at-a-distance. PhD, Dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Ohio. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1299182897. Accessed 1 Apr 2020

  38. Theodoros DG, Constantinescu G, Russell TG, Ward EC, Wilson SJ, Wootton R (2006) Treating the speech disorder in Parkinson’s disease online. J Telemed Telecare 1(12 Suppl 3):S88–S91. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763306779380101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mashima PA, Birkmire-Peters DP, Syms MJ, Holtel MR, Burgess L, Peters LJ (2003) Telehealth: voice therapy using telecommunications technology. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 12(4):432–439. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2003/089)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fu S, Theodoros DG, Ward EC (2015) Intensive versus traditional voice therapy for vocal nodules: perceptual, physiological, acoustic and aerodynamic changes. J Voice 29(2):260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Patel RR, Bless DM, Thibeault SL (2011) Boot camp: a novel intensive approach to voice therapy. J Voice 25(5):562–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.01.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Abrahamsson M, Millgård M, Havstam C, Tuomi L (2018) Effects of voice therapy: a comparison between individual and group therapy. J Voice 32(4):437–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Law T, Lee KY, Ho FN, Vlantis AC, Van Hasselt AC, Tong MC (2012) The effectiveness of group voice therapy: a group climate perspective. J Voice 26(2):e41–e48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bernal G, Jiménez-Chafey MI, DomenechRodríguez MM (2009) Cultural adaptation of treatments: a resource for considering culture in evidence-based practice. Prof Psychol Res Pr 40(4):361–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Burg I, Meier B, Nolte K, Oppermann T, Rogg V, Beushausen U (2015) Selection of voice therapy methods: results of an online survey. J Voice 29(6):776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lavorato AS, McFarlane SC (1988) Counseling clients with voice disorders. Semin Speech Lang 9(3):237–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2004) Admission/discharge criteria in speech-language pathology [Guidelines]. https://www.asha.org/policy. Accessed 2 Apr 2020

  48. Gillespie AI, Gartner-Schmidt J (2018) Voice-specialized speech-language pathologist’s criteria for discharge from voice therapy. J Voice 32(3):332–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.05.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Porur, Chennai, 116, India

    Yamini Venkatraman, Suryakala Ganesan, Shenbagavalli Mahalingam & Prakash Boominathan

Authors
  1. Yamini Venkatraman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suryakala Ganesan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shenbagavalli Mahalingam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Prakash Boominathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prakash Boominathan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Institutional Ethics Committee approval has been obtained prior to the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venkatraman, Y., Ganesan, S., Mahalingam, S. et al. An E-Survey of Current Voice Therapy Practices Amongst Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) in India. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74 (Suppl 2), 1902–1909 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01910-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01910-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation