Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison Between Effectiveness of Topical Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray Versus Topical Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A One Year Hospital Based Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare the effectiveness between topical mometasone furoate nasal spray versus topical fluticasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Randomized control trial was conducted involving 70 patients. One group received topical mometasone furoate nasal spray and the other group received fluticasone furoate nasal spray for 3 weeks. All patients were prescribed oral ciprofloxacin for 3 weeks and were subjectively evaluated using the Lund and Mackay staging system and objectively using nasal endoscopy by the Lund and Kennedy scoring system. There was no inter group significance but all patients improved significantly after the administration of either of the steroid sprays. Following administration of steroid nasal sprays, there was clinically significant improvement in the symptoms and signs of chronic rhinosinusitis, but there was no statistical significance between the two study groups. Thus, steroid nasal sprays significantly improve the symptoms and resolution of signs of chronic rhinosinusitis. The choice of drug still remains uncertain to the clinician. However, long term studies with more sample size is needed to arrive at sound conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benninger MS, Ferguson BJ, Hadley JA, Hamilos DJ, Jacobs M, Kennedy DW et al (2003) Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: definition, diagnosis, epidemiology and pathophysiology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(3):S1–S32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Suh JD, Kennedy DW (2011) Treatment options for chronic rhinosinusitis. Proc Am Thorac Soc 8(1):132–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramadhin A (2015) Evaluation of the change in recent diagnostic criteria of chronic rhinosinusitis: a cross-sectional study. Clin Rhinol An Int J 8(3):110–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harugop A, Mudhol RS, Kapoor A (2014) Subjective outcome of endoscopic sinus surgery in patients of chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis—a comparative study. Biomed J 34(3):348–355

    Google Scholar 

  5. Surapaneni H, Sisodia SS (2016) Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a study in a teaching hospital in Telangana. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2:14–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shikani AH, Chahine KA, Alqudah MA (2014) Rhinotopic therapy for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis: a study of 20 cases. Ear Nose Throat J 93:E48–E54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lund VJ (2005) Maximal medical therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolayngol Clin N Am 38(6):1301–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh R. Havaldar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (formerly KLE University). The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harugop, A.S., Havaldar, R.R. & Patil, P.H. Comparison Between Effectiveness of Topical Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray Versus Topical Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A One Year Hospital Based Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74 (Suppl 2), 821–825 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01872-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01872-3

Keywords

Navigation