Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postoperative Outcomes in Cold Dissection Versus Bipolar Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tonsillectomy is one of the oldest and most common procedures worldwide. This surgery is performed by different methods include cold dissection technique (CDT) and bipolar electrocautery technique (BET). Assessment and comparison of postoperative outcomes in cold dissection and bipolar electrocautery is the aim of present study. This randomized controlled clinical trial study was conducted as double-blind on 534 patients. The enrolled patients underwent tonsillectomy in Vali-e-Asr Hospital of Birjand city from Oct. 2013–Oct. 2015. Al patients systematically allocated into two groups treated with cold dissection or bipolar electrocautery methods. Intensity of throat pain scores, Otalgia, analgesic consumption, resume normal diet, body temperature and also wound healing on 10th day after operation were measured and compared between the two groups. The gathered data were analyzed by SPSS software (Ver-22) and using necessary tests. The differences between studied groups less than 0.5 (p < 0.05) considered significant statically. 51.7 and 50.6% in the CDT and the BET groups were male respectively. In comparison between the groups the mean of pain scores 4 and 24 h after operation in the BET group were higher significantly (p < 0.001). Otalgia only 4 h after surgery was higher significantly in the BET group (p = 0.008). All the other studied parameters were significantly more desirable in the CDT group (p < 0.001). According to the findings of present study it seems that the CDT is safer and more favorable than the BET in tonsillectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ali M, Rafique A, Dastgir M, Rashid M, Maqbool S, Bashir S (2014) Comparison of bipolar electrocautry and cold steel dissection methods for tonsillectomy. Pak Armed Forces Med J 64(1):34–38

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khan MA, Khan ZU, Akram S, Rafique U, Usman HB (2015) Comparison of postoperative pain and hemorrhage in children after tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy technique versus tonsillectomy with cold steel dissection and silk ligature. Pak Armed Forces Med J 65(6):739–742

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adoga A (2011) Cold versus hot dissection tonsillectomies: the Nigerian experience. East Cent Afr J Surg 16(3):64–68

  4. Vithayathil AA, Maruvala S (2017) Comparison between cold dissection snare method and bipolar electrodissection method in tonsillectomy. Res Otolaryngol 6(2):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guragain R, Bhusal C, Adhikari P, Pokharel R (2011) Intraoperative blood loss and operating time in tonsillectomy: Is electrodissection better? Nepal J ENT Head Neck Surg 1(1):6–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stavroulaki P, Skoulakis C, Theos E, Kokalis N, Valagianis D (2007) Thermal welding versus cold dissection tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116(8):565–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Juboori AN (2016) Safety of cold tonsillectomy techniques: comparison between wired snare and inferior tonsillar pole ligation methods. Int J Otorhinolaryngol 3(1):1–4

  8. Raut V, Bhat N, Kinsella J, Toner J, Sinnathuray A, Stevenson M (2001) Bipolar scissors versus cold dissection tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, multi-unit study. Laryngoscope 111(12):2178–2182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kousha A, Banan R, Fotoohi N, Banan R (2007) Cold dissection versus bipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy. J Res Med Sci 12(3):117–120

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pizzuto MP, Brodsky L, Duffy L, Gendler J, Nauenberg E (2000) A comparison of microbipolar cautery dissection to hot knife and cold knife cautery tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 52(3):239–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paradise JL, Bernard BS, Colborn DK, Janosky JE (1998) Assessment of adenoidal obstruction in children: clinical signs versus roentgenographic findings. Pediatrics 101(6):979–986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mofatteh MR, Golbui SH, Hassanzadeh Taheri MM, Hossaini SM, Jannesar Borugerdi Y (2013) Survey of the efficacy of antibiotic therapy on complications consequent of tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy. J Birjand Univ Med Sci 20(3):211–219

  13. Mofatteh MR, Meghdadi S, Sharifzadeh G, Salehi F, Taheri MMH A (2015) Study of the Complications of Bipolar Electrocautery Tonsillectomy in Patients Admitted to Vali-e-Asr Hospital of Birjand. J Surg Trauma 3(3–4):33–38

  14. Gendy S, O’Leary M, Colreavy M, Rowley H, O’Dwyer T, Blayney A (2004) Tonsillectomy–cold dissection vs. hot dissection: a prospective study. Ir Med J 98(10):243–244

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silveira H, Soares JS, Lima HA (2003) Tonsillectomy: cold dissection versus bipolar electrodissection. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67(4):345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Manandhar S, Bhandary S, Chhetri S, Khanal B, Shah S, Sah B et al (2016) Bacteriological evaluation of tonsillar surface and tonsillar core micro flora in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Health Renaiss 12(3):149–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chettri S, Bhandary S, Nepal A, Joshi R, Natesh V, Sah S et al (2014) A single blind controlled study comparing bipolar elecrocautery tonsillectomy to cold dissection method in pediatric age groups. Health Renaiss 11(3):270–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bukhari MA, Al-Ammar AY (2007) Monopolar electrodissection versus cold dissection tonsillectomy among children. Saudi Med J 28(10):1525

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fida AR, Sendi KS (2013) Assessment of postoperative pain scores in thermal welding and conventional tonsillectomy techniques: a randomized control study. Egypt J Ear Nose Throat Allied Sci 14(2):107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yilmaz M, Duzlu M, Catli T, Ustun S, Ceylan A (2012) Thermal welding versus cold knife tonsillectomy: a prospective randomized study. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 28(5):270–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hashemi M, Salmani A, Abtahi M (2002) Post tonsillectomy morbidities: bipolar electrosurgical scissor vs classic method. J Res Med Sci 7(4):324–327

  22. Nunez DA, Provan J, Crawford M (2000) Postoperative tonsillectomy pain in pediatric patients: electrocautery (hot) vs cold dissection and snare tonsillectomy—a randomized trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(7):837–841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pham V, Rana N, Underbrink M, Siddiqui F, Mukerji S, Pine H (2014) Postoperative outcomes in coblation versus electrocautery tonsillectomies. Int J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 3(01):32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alam M, Atiq M, Mamun A, Islam M (2011) Comparison between bipolar diathermy tonsillectomy and cold dissection tonsillectomy. Mymensingh Med J MMJ 20(1):104–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is based on some results of project in code: 1012 and was supported by Vice-chancellor for Research and technology in BUMS. The authors are very grateful to thank all patients and also parents of children patients who participate in this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammadmehdi Hassanzadeh-Taheri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mofatteh, M.R., Salehi, F., Hosseini, M. et al. Postoperative Outcomes in Cold Dissection Versus Bipolar Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71 (Suppl 1), 182–187 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1204-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1204-4

Keywords

Navigation