Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

One-year outcomes of off- and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: PROMOTE patency trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Earlier we reported 3-month graft patency and clinical outcomes of prospective randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary artery bypass surgery to evaluate outcomes and graft patency (PROMOTE patency) trial. We now report major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using either off-pump technique or on-pump technique.

Methods

The PROMOTE patency trial is a two-arm, prospective, randomized, multicentre trial, and enrolled 320 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease from March 2016 through March 2017 at 6 centres and were randomly assigned to undergo either off-pump CABG (OPCAB) (n = 158 patients) or on-pump CABG (n = 162 patients). The outcomes at 1 year were assessed.

Results

One mortality (0.64%) occurred in off-pump group (at 30 days) and 4 (2.48%) in on-pump group (1 at 30 days, 2 at 3 months, and 1 at 1 year) (p = 0.37). There was no difference between off-pump and on-pump groups in the outcomes of nonfatal myocardial infarction (1 in off-pump and 2 in on-pump group, p = 1.00) and cerebrovascular accident (none in off-pump and 2 in on-pump group, p = 0.49). Repeat revascularization was done in one patient in each group (p = 1.00).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACCE between off-pump and on-pump CABG group at 1 year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sajja LR, Sarkar K, Mannam G, et al. Graft patency at 3 months after off- and on-pump coronary bypass surgery: a randomized trial. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;36:93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Diegeler A, Börgermann J, Kappert U, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1489–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al. Effects of on-pump and off-pump surgery in the arterial revascularization trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:1059–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1827–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hattler B, Messenger JC, Shroyer AL, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: results from the veterans affairs randomized on/off bypass (ROOBY) trial. Circulation. 2012;125:2827–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1179–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. Off-pump vs. conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1841–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sajja LR, Mannam G, Sompali S, et al. Does multi- vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduce post-operative morbidity compared to on-pump CABG? Ind J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;20:173–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Biller J, Feinberg W, Castaldo JE, et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the stroke council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 1998;29:554–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in beating heart against cardioplegic arrest studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2002;359:1194–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, et al. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:394–402.

  13. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, et al. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation. 2001;104:1761–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Okano R, Liou YJ, Yu HY, et al. Coronary artery bypass in young patients—on or off-pump? J Clin Med. 2019;8:128. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020128.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. A. Nadamuni Naidu, M. Sc (Stat), Head, Department of Statistics (Retired), National Institute of Nutrition, ICMR, Hyderabad, India and Trustee, Sajja Heart Foundation, Hyderabad, India for statistical advice and analysis for this study, and we thank all the coordinators of the study from various institutions in coordinating the study: Mr. Mamidala Parusharamulu of Star Hospitals, Hyderabad; Mr. Arnab Naik of Medica Superspeciality, Kolkata; MS. Shashirekha of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad; MS. Mahalakshmi Shanmugam of G Kuppuswamy Naidu Memorial Hospital, Coimbatore; Dr. Reenali Bariya of DDMM Heart Institute, Gujarat; and Dr. Neeraj of Fortis Hospital, Mumbai.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lokeswara Rao Sajja.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This trial complies with the principles of The Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional ethics committees of participating institutions.

Informed consent

All patients signed an informed consent.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This study complies with the principles of The Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sajja, L.R., Sarkar, K., Mannam, G. et al. One-year outcomes of off- and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: PROMOTE patency trial. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 36, 469–475 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-020-00940-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-020-00940-1

Keywords

Navigation