Skip to main content
Log in

Off-pump versus on-pump bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease (EXCEL study) – is experience the unknown variable?

  • Critical Appraisal of Trials
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A post hoc analysis of the Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) data compared off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) technique with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It was reported that OPCAB was associated with lower rate of revascularization especially in the inferolateral wall and carried increased risk of 3-year all-cause mortality compared to on-pump CABG. However, the study does not provide any information on the experience of participating surgeons which is a key determinant of outcomes in OPCAB surgery. In the absence of this key variable, the extrapolation and applicability of this finding to the wider surgical practice, especially in countries like India and Japan, may not be accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benedetto U, Puskas J, Kappetein AP, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:729–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kappetein AP, Serruys PW, Sabik JF, et al. Design and rationale for a randomised comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in selected patients with left main coronary artery disease: the EXCEL trial. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:861–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Angelini GD. An old off-pump coronary artery bypass surgeon’s reflections: a retrospective. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157:2274–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1827–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Diegeler A, Börgermann J, Kappert U, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2359–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benedetto U, Lau C, Caputo M, et al. Comparison of outcomes for off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in low-volume and high-volume centers and by low-volume and high-volume surgeons. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121:552–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Taggart DP, Benedetto U, Gerry S, et al. Bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts at 10 years. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:437–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sajja LR, Sarkar K, Mannam G, et al. Graft patency at 3 months after off- and on-pump coronary bypass surgery: a randomized trial. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00869-0.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep Narayan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Narayan, P. Off-pump versus on-pump bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease (EXCEL study) – is experience the unknown variable?. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 36, 253–255 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00914-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00914-y

Keywords

Navigation