Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy dehiscence and mediastinitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Post-sternotomy dehiscence and mediastinitis remains a serious complication in cardiothoracic surgery. The aim of this work is to report our experience over a period of 8 years in the surgical treatment and risk factor analyses of post-sternotomy dehiscence and mediastinitis.

Methods

All patients treated for post-sternotomy dehiscence at our Thoracic Surgery Unit in the last 8 years were retrospectively collected. We identified 237 patients with post-sternotomy dehiscence/mediastinitis. Forty-two patients had simple fractures of the metal steel wires, 61 had an asymmetric sternotomy with multiple sternal fractures, 113 had a symmetric sternotomy with multiple sternal fractures, 14 had a failed Robicsek procedure, and 7 had sternal dehiscence with mediastinal abscess.

Results

Different surgical techniques and materials were used to repair the sternum. In 21 patients, the first revision failed and a second reoperation was required. At multivariate analyses, we have identified risk factors for revision failure and in-hospital mortality. Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent more than one surgical revision (8% vs 19%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with sternal dehiscence are very fragile due to multiple preoperative comorbidities as reflected by postoperative morbidity and risk factors for in-hospital mortality. A correct evaluation of the characteristics of sternal dehiscence is important to guide the most appropriate repair strategy. Patients who need repeated sternal revisions had a higher mortality. Further randomized studies are needed to evaluate different techniques and medical devices to define the gold standard procedure to reduce significantly sternal wound complications in high-risk patients as defined by well-known risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaul P. Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy mediastinitis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12:94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hosseinrezaei H, Rafiei H, Amiri M. Incidence and risk factors of sternal wound infection at site of incision after open-heart surgery. J Wound Care. 2012;21:408–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schimmer C, Reents W, Berneder S, et al. Prevention of sternal dehiscence and infection in high-risk patients: a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1897–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alhalawani AM, Towler MR. A review of sternal closure techniques. J Biomater Appl. 2013;28:483–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robicsek F, Daugherty HK, Cook JW. The prevention and treatment of sternum separation following open-heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;73:267–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma R, Puri D, Panigrahi BP, Virdi IS. A modified parasternal wire technique for prevention and treatment of sternal dehiscence. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:210–03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Voss B, Will A, Large R, Voss B. Mid-term results after sternal reconstruction using titanium plates: is it worth it to plate? Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:1640–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bejko J, Tarzia V, De Franceschi M, et al. Nitinol flexigrip sternal closure system and chest wound infections: insight from a comparative analysis of complications and costs. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1848–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marasco SF, Fuller L, Zimmet A, et al. Prospective, randomized controlled trial of polymer cable ties versus standard wire closure of midline sternotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:1589–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stella F, Dell’Amore A, Dolci G, et al. Allogenic sternal transplant after sternectomy for metastasis of ovarian carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:e71–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vos RJ, Van Putte BP, Kloppenburg GTL. Prevention of deep sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery: a literature review. J Hosp Infect. 2018;100:411–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Vida V, Casarotto D, Gerosa G. Double crisscross sternal wiring and chest wound infections: a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:1352–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peigh G, Kumar J, Unai S, James DT, Hirose H. Randomized trial of sternal closure for low risk patients: rigid fixation versus wire closure. Heart Surg Forum. 2017;20:E164–E169.

  14. Tam DY, Nedadur R, Yu M, Yanagawa B, Fremes SE, Friedrich JO. Rigid plate fixation versus wire cerclage for sternotomy after cardiac surgery: a meta analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106:298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Losanoff JE, Basson MD, Gruber SA, Huff H, Hsieh FH. Single wire versus double wire loops for median sternotomy closure: experimental biochemical study using a human cadaveric model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1288–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dell’Amore A, Campisi A, Giunta D, et al. Surgical options to treat massive sternal defect after failed Robicsek procedure. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:E410–E415.

  17. Dell’Amore A, Dolci G, Cassanelli N, Bini A, Stella F. A massive post-sternotomy sternal defect treated by allograft sternal transplantation. J Card Surg. 2012;27:557–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalab M, Karkoska J, Kaminek M, et al. Reconstruction of massive post-sternotomy defects with allogenic bone graft: four-year results and experience using the method. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22:305–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dell’Amore A, Cassanelli N, Dolci G, Stella F. An alternative technique for anterior chest wall reconstruction: the sternal allograft transplantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15:944–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marulli G, Dell’amore A, Calabrese F, et al. Safety and effectiveness of cadaveric allograft sternochondral replacement after sternectomy: a new tool for the reconstruction of anterior chest wall. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:898–905.

  21. Sanna S, Brandolini J, Pardolesi A, et al. Materials and techniques in chest wall reconstruction: a review. J Vis Surg. 2017;3:95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Allen KB, Icke KJ, Thourani VH, et al. Sternotomy closure using rigid plate fixation: a paradigm shift from wire cerclage. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;7:611–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raman J, Lehmann S, Zehr K, et al. Sternal closure with rigid plate fixation versus wire closure: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1854–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma JG, An JX. Deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: a comparison of three different wound infection types and an analysis of antibiotic resistance. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:377–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moriaski A, Hosono M, Murakami T, et al. Effect of negative pressure wound therapy followed by tissue flaps for deep sternal wound infection after cardiovascular surgery: propensity score matching analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23:397–402.

  26. Van Wingerden JJ, Lapid O, Boonstra PW, de Mol BA. Muscle flaps or omental flap in the management of deep sternal wound infection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13:179–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gummert JF, Barten MJ, Hans C, et al. Mediastinitis and cardiac surgery—an updated risk factor analysis in 10,373 consecutive adult patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;50:87–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We declare no external financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: ADA and DG

Administrative support: SZ and SM

Provision of study materials: SC and AC

Collection and assembly of data: SM, SC, and SZ

Data analysis and interpretation: ADA and DG

Manuscript writing: all Authors

Final approval of the manuscript: all authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Dell’Amore.

Ethics declarations

This retrospective multicenter study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of S. Orsola Malpighi University Hospital in Bologna, and the study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dell’Amore, A., Congiu, S., Campisi, A. et al. Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy dehiscence and mediastinitis. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 36, 388–396 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00880-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00880-5

Keywords

Navigation