Skip to main content
Log in

Photometric calibrations and characterization of the 4K\(\times \)4K CCD imager, the first-light axial port instrument for the 3.6m DOT

  • Observational Facilities
  • Published:
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present work, recent characterization results of the 4K \(\times \) 4K CCD imager (a first light instrument of the 3.6m devasthal optical telescope; DOT) and photometric calibrations are discussed along with measurements of the extinction coefficients and sky brightness values at the location of the 3.6m DOT site based on the imaging data taken between 2016 and 2021. For the 4K \(\times \) 4K CCD imager, all given combinations of gains (1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 e\(^-\)/ADU) and readout noise values for the three readout speeds (100 kHz, 500 kHz and 1 MHz) are verified using the sky flats and bias frames taken during early 2021; measured values resemble well with the theoretical ones. Using color–color and color–magnitude transformation equations, color coefficients (\(\alpha \)) and zero-points (\(\beta \)) are determined to constrain and examine their long-term consistencies and any possible evolution based on UBVRI observations of several Landolt standard fields observed during 2016–2021. Our present analysis exhibits consistency among estimated \(\alpha \) values within the 1\(\sigma \) and does not show any noticeable trend with time. We also found that the photometric errors and limiting magnitudes computed using the data taken using the CCD imager follow the simulated ones published earlier. The average extinction coefficients, their seasonal variations and zenith night-sky brightness values for the moon-less nights for all ten Bessell and SDSS filters are also estimated and found comparable to those reported for other good astronomical sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.aries.res.in/sites/default/files/files/3.6-DOT/imager.pdf.

  2. http://www.sta-inc.net.

  3. https://www.aries.res.in/facilities/astronomical-telescopes/360cm-telescope/Instruments.

References

  • Altavilla G., Marinoni S., Pancino E., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 2848

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Baug T., Ojha D. K., Ghosh S. K., et al. 2018, JAI, 7, 1850003

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Benn C. R., Ellison S. L. 1998, Nature, 42, 503

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessell M. S. 2005, ARAA, 43, 293

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gill A., Benton S. J., Brown A. M., et al. 2020, AJ, 160, 266

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes D. S., Latham D. W. 1975, ApJ, 197, 593

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Howell S. B. 2006, Handbook of CCD Astronomy, Vol. 5 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

  • Janesick J. R. 2001, Scientific charge-coupled devices (Bellingham, WA: The International Society for Optical Engineering)

  • Krisciunas K. 1997, PASP, 109, 1181

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Krisciunas K., Semler D. R., Richards J., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 687

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A., Pandey S. B., Aryan A., et al. 2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 27653, 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A., Kumar B., Pandey S. B., et al. 2021a, MNRAS, 502, 1678

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A., Pandey S. B., Gupta R., et al. 2021b, RMxAC, 53, 127

  • Kumar B., Sagar R., Rautela B. S., Srivastava J. B., Srivastava R. K. 2000, BASI, 28, 675

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar B., Omar A., Maheswar G., et al. 2018, Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 87, 29

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Landolt A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Leinert C., Vaisanen P., Mattila K., Lehtinen K. 1995, A&AS, 112, 99

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila K., Vaeisaenen P., Appen-Schnur G. F. O. V. 1996, A&AS, 119, 153

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan V., Uddin W., Sagar R., Gupta S. K. 1999, BASI, 27, 601

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholl M., Berger E., Margutti R., et al. 2017, ApJL, 845, L8

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey S. B. 2016, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Vol 48, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 83

  • Pandey S. B., Yadav R. K. S., Nanjappa N., et al. 2018, Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, 87, 42

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey S. B., Kumar A., Kumar B., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 1229

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Patat F. 2003, AAP, 400, 1183

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Patat F. 2008, AAP, 481, 575

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Romanishin W. 2002, An Introduction to Astronomical Photometry Using CCDs, Vol. 4 (Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma)

  • Sagar R., Kumar B., Omar A. 2019, Curr. Sci., 117, 365

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sagar R., Kumar B., Sharma S. 2020, JoAA, 41, 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A. 2021, RedPipe: Reduction Pipeline, ascl:2106.024

  • Stalin C. S., Hegde M., Sahu D. K., et al. 2008, BASI, 36, 111

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study uses data observed using the 4K\(\times \)4K CCD imager mounted at the axial port of the 3.6m DOT during 2016–2021. The data of the Landolt standards in this study obtained by the imager team were used for tests and calibrations purposes. The authors of this paper are highly thankful to the observing staff and the observing assistants for their support during observations with the 3.6m DOT. AK, SBP and RKSY also acknowledge 3.6m DOT proposals DOT-2020-C2-P42, DOT-2021-C1-P55 and instrument verification nights in obtaining the data used in this study. SBP also acknowledge BRICS grant DST/IMRCD/BRICS/Pilotcall/ProFCheap/2017(G).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Kumar.

Additional information

This article is part of the Special Issue on "Astrophysical Jets and Observational Facilities: A National Perspective".

Appendix

Appendix

As an example, Figure A1 represents the PTCs for obtaining the gain values for readout speed of 100 kHz and theoretical gain values of 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 e\(^-\)/ADU. Similarly, the gain values are verified for readout speeds of 500 kHz and 1 MHz; those are tabulated in Table 1. The observations log of all the Landolt standard fields used in this study is tabulated in Table A1. The FWHM (in arc-sec; for V-band) values for all these Landolt fields (having an airmass range of \(\sim \)1–1.5) were also estimated (see Figure A2) using IRAF/imexa. Figure A2 shows the distribution of measured FWHM values in V-band for present observations distributed over 32 nights during a span of 5 years. For nearly 10% of the observed sample, <1 arc-sec FWHM values were observed. The best FWHM obtained for a point source was about 0.43 arc-sec on 17 March 2020 (see a r-band stellar image in Figure A3) along with many faint galaxies detected in the field. We have also shown the contour and radial profile of the stellar image in Figure A3, respectively. The FWHM of the stellar profile is \(\sim \)2.26 pixels which convert to \(\sim \)0.43 arc-sec using the plate scale of the CCD (0.19 arc-sec per pixel for \({2} \times{2}\) binning) on the sky.

Figure A1
figure a

PTCs of the 4K\(\times \)4K CCD imager taken at readout speed of 100 kHz and for all available gain values. The measured gain values are \({\sim }0.98\pm 0.05\), \(1.95\pm 0.06\), \(2.87\pm 0.10\), \(4.85\pm 0.12\) and \(9.81\pm 0.15\) e\(^-/\)ADU for theoretical gain values of 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 e\(^-/\)ADU, respectively.

Figure A2
figure b

FWHM values (in arc-sec) estimated using V-band imaging data of the standard fields (Landolt 1992) discussed in Table A1 using the 4K\(\times \)4K CCD imager mounted at the axial port of the 3.6m DOT during 2016–2021. For nearly 10% of nights, the FWHM values are <1 arc-sec for V-band.

Table A1 Log of Landolt standard fields (Landolt 1992) used in this study observed in Bessell UBVRI and SDSS ugriz filters from 2016 to 2021.
Figure A3
figure c

The field of SLSN 2017egm observed in r-band on 17 March 2020, for an exposure time of 600s, is shown. This image clearly detects many galaxies in the field as faint as \(\sim \)22 mag along with several faint point sources as expected with this CCD imager. The FWHM of the stellar profile (in red box) was observed as \(\sim \)0.43 arc-sec. The contour and radial profile of the stellar image are also shown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Pandey, S.B., Singh, A. et al. Photometric calibrations and characterization of the 4K\(\times \)4K CCD imager, the first-light axial port instrument for the 3.6m DOT. J Astrophys Astron 43, 27 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-022-09798-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-022-09798-8

Keyword

Navigation