Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Economic perspective of cancer treatment in India

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Financial constraints faced by the families play a vital role in cancer treatment refusal, non-adherence, and failure of the prescribed therapy. This review aims to give an insight into the economic perspective of cancer treatment in India, focusing on the accessibility and affordability of oncological drugs, and the move towards generics/biosimilars without compromising on the quality of the treatment. The monthly cost of a set of drugs available in India for the treatment of solid malignancies, approved after 2010 by the US FDA and the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) were calculated based on standard patient parameters. The information on the clinical trial, the monthly cost of treatment, and the availability of its equivalent have been compiled. Newer cancer drugs are approved based on surrogate endpoints, with a very modest prolongation of life, but the cost incurred can be unbearable. There is a considerable variation in costs between the innovator and the equivalent drugs, making the latter cost-effective. We have highlighted the importance of generics and biosimilars, as a cost-cutting strategy, in delivering state-of-art health care with a lesser chance of treatment abandonment: this will ensure that all patients have equal access to personalized medicine which are reliable, effective, and affordable for better curative, supportive, and palliative care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Prasad V, De Jesus K, Mailankody S. The high price of anticancer drugs: origins, implications, barriers, solutions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:381–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rajkumar T. Cancer immunotherapy: an impossible dream for the common man? Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2020;41:312–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis LM, Bernstein DS, Voest EE, Berlin JD, Sargent D, Cortazar P, et al. American society of clinical oncology perspective: raising the bar for clinical trials by defining clinically meaningful outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1277–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haitsma G, Patel H, Gurumurthy P, Postma MJ. Access to anti-cancer drugs in India: is there a need to revise reimbursement policies? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;18:289–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vokinger K, Hwang T, Grischott T, Reichert S, Tibau A, Rosemann T, et al. Prices and clinical benefit of cancer drugs in the USA and Europe: a cost-benefit analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:664–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Report of national cancer registry programme. 2020. https://www.ncdirindia.org/All_Reports/Report_2020/resources/NCRP_2020_2012_16.pdf

  7. Babar Z-U-D, Hussain R, Hasan S. Medicine prices in Asia–Pacific Countries. In: Medicine Price Surveys, Analyses and Comparisons: Evidence and Methodology Guidance. Elsevier Academic Press; 2020. p. 45–60.

  8. Pramesh CS, Badwe RA, Borthakur BB, Chandra M, Raj EH, Kannan T, et al. Delivery of affordable and equitable cancer care in India. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e223–e233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prinja S, Chauhan AS, Karan A, Kaur G, Kumar R. Impact of publicly financed health insurance schemes on healthcare utilization and financial risk protection in india: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0170996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prashant Kumar S, Shalini S (2020) What is the cost of cancer care in India?.https://nicpr.icmr.org.in/

  11. Goldstein DA, Clark J, Tu Y, Zhang J, Fang F, Goldstein R, et al. A global comparison of the cost of patented cancer drugs in relation to global differences in wealth. Oncotarget. 2017;8:71548–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kolasani BP, Malathi DC, Ponnaluri RR. Variation of cost among anti-cancer drugs available in Indian market. J ClinDiagn Res. 2016;10:FC17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adwal S, Baghel R. Price variation in different brands of anticancer drugs available in Indian pharmaceutical market: a cost analysis study. Int J Basic ClinPharmacol. 2019;8:642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta N, Verma RK, Gupta S, Prinja S. Cost effectiveness of trastuzumab for management of breast cancer in India. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020;6:205–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta N, Verma RK, Prinja S, Dhiman RK. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in India. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2019;9:468–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mukhopadhyay A, Das S, Sharma K, Dash S. Estimating the economic burden of cancer at a tertiary public hospital: a study at the all India Institute of Medical Sciences. Discuss Pap Econ. 2011;11–09

    Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines, 21st List. 21st ed. Geneva: World health organization; 2019. https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en/

  18. Rushvi P, Charmy K, Choudhary Nirav CPN. Biosimilars: an emerging market opportunities in India. Pharm Regul Aff. 2016;05:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meher B, Balan S, Mohanty R, Jena M, Das S. Biosimilars in India; current status and future perspectives. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2019;11:12–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikita Mehra.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Natarajan, A., Mehra, N. & Rajkumar, T. Economic perspective of cancer treatment in India. Med Oncol 37, 101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-020-01424-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-020-01424-3

Keywords

Navigation