Skip to main content
Log in

Albumin-Induced Neuroprotection in Focal Cerebral Ischemia in the ALIAS Trial: Does Severity, Mechanism, and Time of Infusion Matter?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether there is any differential benefit of albumin administration within 2 h of onset of ischemia and in settings (severe ischemia with reperfusion in cardioembolic strokes with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≥15), most representative of experimental models of cerebral ischemia in which albumin was effective in reducing neurological injury.

Background

High-dose intravenous (IV) albumin treatment for acute ischemic stroke (ALIAS) trial did not show overall clinical benefit in ischemic stroke patients in contrast to preclinical studies; however, models of preclinical studies were not completely followed.

Methods

A total of 1275 patients combined from ALIAS trials I and II were included in our analysis. We analyzed preclinical studies and selected patients with large ischemic stroke (NIHSS ≥15) related to cardioembolic etiology (n = 189). Outcomes were then studied including time from onset to IV albumin administration.

Results

The odds of excellent outcome (mRS 0–1) at 3 months was not different with high-dose IV albumin infusion (n = 100) compared with placebo (n = 89) ((odds ratio [OR]) 1.632 [0.719–3.708], p value 0.2419). When we further classified these subjects according to time of IV albumin administration, we observed significantly higher odds of excellent outcome at 3 months when patients received IV albumin within 2 h, OR 9.369 (CI 1.040–84.405), p value 0.0461, after adjusting for age, gender, baseline NIHSS score, and any therapeutic procedure.

Conclusion

A trend for benefit is noted in ischemic stroke patients with large cardioembolic stroke (NIHSS ≥15) when high-dose albumin was initiated within 2 h, suggesting that certain ischemic stroke subgroups of patients most representative of preclinical settings may benefit from such a treatment. Additional clinical trials maybe needed to stratify subjects and treatment assignments according to NIHSS severity and timely randomization to evaluate this concept further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palesch YY, et al. The ALIAS Pilot Trial: a dose-escalation and safety study of albumin therapy for acute ischemic stroke—II: neurologic outcome and efficacy analysis. Stroke. 2006;37(8):2107–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ginsberg MD, et al. High-dose albumin treatment for acute ischaemic stroke (ALIAS) part 2: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(11):1049–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheitz JF, et al. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for prediction of proximal vessel occlusion in anterior circulation stroke. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(6):E60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maas MB, et al. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score is poorly predictive of proximal occlusion in acute cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2009;40(9):2988–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ginsberg MD, et al. The albumin in acute stroke (ALIAS) multicenter clinical trial: safety analysis of part 1 and rationale and design of part 2. Stroke. 2011;42(1):119–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adams HP Jr, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):35–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawle AP, et al. Comparative evaluation of risk factors, outcome and biomarker levels in young and old acute ischemic stroke patients. Ann Neurosci. 2015;22(2):70–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Haast RA, Gustafson DR, Kiliaan AJ. Sex differences in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32(12):2100–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomita H, et al. Impact of sex difference on severity and functional outcome in patients with cardioembolic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(11):2613–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buijs JE, et al. The effect of age and sex on clinical outcome after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(2):312–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adams HP Jr, et al. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology. 1999;53(1):126–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Petty GW, et al. Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of functional outcome, survival, and recurrence. Stroke. 2000;31(5):1062–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kolominsky-Rabas PL, et al. Epidemiology of ischemic stroke subtypes according to TOAST criteria: incidence, recurrence, and long-term survival in ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study. Stroke. 2001;32(12):2735–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park HP, et al. Albumin therapy augments the effect of thrombolysis on local vascular dynamics in a rat model of arteriolar thrombosis: a two-photon laser-scanning microscopy study. Stroke. 2008;39(5):1556–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Nimmagadda A, et al. Albumin therapy improves local vascular dynamics in a rat model of primary microvascular thrombosis: a two-photon laser-scanning microscopy study. Stroke. 2008;39(1):198–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodriguez de Turco EB, et al. Systemic fatty acid responses to transient focal cerebral ischemia: influence of neuroprotectant therapy with human albumin. J Neurochem. 2002;83(3):515–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Belayev L, et al. Human albumin therapy of acute ischemic stroke: marked neuroprotective efficacy at moderate doses and with a broad therapeutic window. Stroke. 2001;32(2):553–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Y, et al. Neuroprotective effect of treatment with human albumin in permanent focal cerebral ischemia: histopathology and cortical perfusion studies. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;428(2):193–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Belayev L, et al. Posttreatment with high-dose albumin reduces histopathological damage and improves neurological deficit following fluid percussion brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma. 1999;16(6):445–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Belayev L, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging confirms marked neuroprotective efficacy of albumin therapy in focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1998;29(12):2587–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Belayev L, et al. Effect of delayed albumin hemodilution on infarction volume and brain edema after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. J Neurosurg. 1997;87(4):595–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Palaniswami M, Yan B. Mechanical thrombectomy is now the gold standard for acute ischemic stroke: implications for routine clinical practice. Interv Neurol. 2015;4(1–2):18–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Seners P, et al. Incidence, causes and predictors of neurological deterioration occurring within 24 h following acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review with pathophysiological implications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(1):87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Belayev L, et al. Albumin treatment reduces neurological deficit and protects blood-brain barrier integrity after acute intracortical hematoma in the rat. Stroke. 2005;36(2):326–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Suarez JI, et al. The Albumin in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (ALISAH) multicenter pilot clinical trial: safety and neurologic outcomes. Stroke. 2012;43(3):683–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sonni S, Lioutas VA, Selim MH. New avenues for treatment of intracranial hemorrhage. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2014;16(1):277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Saver JL, et al. Prehospital use of magnesium sulfate as neuroprotection in acute stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(6):528–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rakesh Khatri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals/human participants performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khatri, R., Afzal, M.R., Rodriguez, G.J. et al. Albumin-Induced Neuroprotection in Focal Cerebral Ischemia in the ALIAS Trial: Does Severity, Mechanism, and Time of Infusion Matter?. Neurocrit Care 28, 60–64 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-017-0400-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-017-0400-0

Keywords

Navigation