Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utility of the sternal synostosis for age-at-death estimation in a Mediterranean population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Age estimation is essential for the identification of skeletal remains in Forensic Anthropology. Numerous studies have been performed on diverse regions of the skeleton, including the synostosis of the sternal segments. In this sense, the fusion of the different sternal segments was assessed to analyze whether it had a correlation with age-at-death in a Mediterranean population. A total of 189 sternums which belonged to individuals between the ages of 20 and 98 from both sexes (56.6% males; 43.4% females), from the San José’s Cemetery of Granada Contemporary Collection (Spain), were selected. Scores ranging from 1 to 3 were assigned in accordance with the degree of manubrio-sternal fusion and sterno-xyphoidal fusion. Cohen’s kappa coefficient for intra- and inter-observer error was performed and then chi-square test was run to analyze any correlation between the stage of synostosis and the skeletal age. Only the sterno-xyphoidal fusion, which starts between 30 and 39 years old, provided a predictable result, as the manubrium and the sternal body usually remain without fusion. This study demonstrates a direct correlation between fusion of the xyphoid process and chronological age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History organized by Jonathan Haas. Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research; 1994;(44).

  2. Ramey Burns K. Manual de Antropología. Forense. Barcelona: Bellaterra; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cunningham C, Scheuer L, Black S. Developmental Juvenile Osteology. Washington: Academic Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demirjian A, Goldstein H. Tanner J (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;46(2):211–27.

    Google Scholar 

  5. AlQahtani S, Hector M, Liversidge H. Brief Communication: The London atlas of human tooth development and eruption. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010;142:481–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. White T, Black W, Folkens P. Human osteology. 3ª. California: Academic Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Suchey J. Problems in the aging of females using the os pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1979;51:467–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330510319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz D, Suchey J. Age determination of the male os pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986;69:427–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330690402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Todd T. Age changes in the pubic bone. The white male pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1920;427–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330030301.

  10. Brooks S, Suchey J. Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: a comparison of Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Hum Evol. 1990;227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437238.

  11. Lovejoy C, Meindl R, Pryzbeck T, Mensforth R. Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: a new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1985;68:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330680103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murray K, Murray T. A test of the auricular surface ageing technique. J Forensic Sci. 1991;36:1162–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buckberry J, Chamberlain A. Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: a revised method. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;119:231–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmitt A. Age-at-death assessment using the os pubis and the auricular surface of the ilium: a test on an identified Asian sample. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2004;14:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garamendi G, Botella M, Alemán I, Landa M. Fusión de la epífisis esternal de la clavícula en relación con la edad. Aplicaciones en la estimación forense de la edad. Cuad Med Forense. 2007;13(48–49):143–156.

  16. El Morsi D, El-Atta H, ElMaadawy H, et al. Age estimation from ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysis by computed tomography. Int J Morphol. 2015;33(4):1419–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buckley M, Clark K. Forensic age estimation using the medial clavicular epiphysis: a study review. Radiol Technol. 2017;88(5):482–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. İşcan M, Loth S, Wright R. Metamorphosis at the sternal rib end: a new method to estimate age at death in white males. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1984;65:147–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330650206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. İşcan M, Loth S, Wright R. Age estimation from the rib by phase analysis: White males. J Forensic Sci. 1984;29:1094–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. İşcan M, Loth S, Wright R. Age estimation from the rib by phase analysis: White females. J Forensic Sci. 1985;30:853–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kunos C. First rib metamorphosis: its possible utility for Human age-at-death estimation. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1999;110:303–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurki H. Use of the first rib for adult age estimation: a test of one method. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2005;15:342–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cattaneo C. Forensic anthropology: developments of a classical discipline in the new millennium. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165:185–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson RWA, Jackson MJ. Forensic science. Gosport: Colour Press Ltd; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ashley G. The human sternum - the influence of sex & age on its measurements. J Forensic Med. 1956;3:27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jit I, Bakshi T. Time of fusion of the human mesosternum with manubrium and xiphoid process. Indian J Med Res. 1986;83:322–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gautam R, Shah G, Jadav H, Gohil B. The human sternum - as an index of age and sex. J Anat Soc India. 2003;20-23.

  28. Chandrakanth H, Kanchan T, Krishan K, et al. Estimation of age from human sternum: an autopsy study on a sample from South India. Int J Legal Med. 2012;126:863–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0752-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Monum T, Mekjaidee K, Pattamapaspong N, et al. Age estimation by chest plate radiographs in a Thai male population. Sci Justice. 2017;57:169–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2017.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bacci N, Nchabeleng E, Billings B. Forensic age-at-death estimation from the sternum in a black South African population. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;282:233.e1-233.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measur. 1960;20:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ferrante L, Cameriere R. Statistical methods to assess the reliability of measurements in the procedures for forensic age estimation. Int J Legal Med. 2009;123:277–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0349-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dwight T. The sternum as an index of sex, age and height. J Anat. 1881;15:327–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dwight T. The sternum as an index of sex, age and height. J Anat. 1890;24:527–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Emucesa, the San José Cemetery Company of Granada, for allowing us access to study material, to Álvaro Monge-Calleja, Ph.D., for his help and his time reviewing this manuscript before being sent, and also to the Laboratory of Physical Anthropology of the University of Granada and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Funding

This work has been supported by a grant from the FPU Research and Teaching Fellowships (Becas de Formación de Profesorado Universitario FPU), 2018 announcement, ref. FPU18/00669, from the Ministry of Education and Professional Formation, Government of Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Partido Navadijo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

In this case, at the moment that the Osteological Collection of the University of Granada was created, the Ethics Committee in Human Research of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Granada (https://medicina.ugr.es/facultad/comite-etica-investigacion-humana-universidad-ceih) was consulted for the authorization of the pertinent permissions. The Committee resolved that there is no need of written consent, as it is an Osteological Collection from XX and XXI centuries, composed by unclaimed skeletons from the cemetery that are anonymized for the study and do not represent any kind of biological risk.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Partido Navadijo, M., Alemán Aguilera, I. Utility of the sternal synostosis for age-at-death estimation in a Mediterranean population. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 18, 423–428 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-022-00506-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-022-00506-0

Keywords

Navigation