Skip to main content
Log in

Coronal and sagittal suture lengths as novel measurements for sex identification in a sample from the Egyptian population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sex estimation from isolated or fragmented bones is a cornerstone in medicolegal identification. The current study aimed to estimate sex from the lengths of the coronal and sagittal sutures in a sample of Egyptians. The study was performed on a total of 80 adult cadavers (48 males and 32 females) during a routine autopsy. After exposure of the skull vault, the lengths of the coronal and sagittal sutures were measured using a thread and a graduated scale. The mean length of the coronal suture was significantly higher in males (24.8 ± 1.4 cm) than in females (22.7 ± 1.4 cm). The mean length of the sagittal suture was significantly higher in males (11.9±1.6 cm) than in females (10.8±1.6 cm). This study used the lengths of the coronal and sagittal sutures as measurements for sex estimation for the first time. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the combined coronal and sagittal sutures lengths were the best sex discriminator (AUC= 0.859), followed by the coronal suture length (AUC= 0.855), and sagittal suture length (AUC= 0.697). Moreover, regression analysis was performed for sex determination; the highest accuracy was obtained by an equation that included the lengths of the coronal and sagittal sutures together (76%); followed by the coronal suture length (75%); then the sagittal suture length (71%). These measurements are easily obtained during a conventional autopsy and this method of sex estimation is cost effective when compared to radiological and DNA analysis. Moreover, the measurements can be carried out on dry skulls as long as the vault has identifiable landmarks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Master table in the form of excel sheet is attached in submission files

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the curve

B:

Bregma

BLL:

Bregma-lambda length

CSL:

Coronal suture length

EFMA:

Egyptian Forensic Medicine Authority

GCP:

Good Clinical Practice

ICH:

International Council for Harmonisation

L:

Lambda

P:

Pterion

ROC:

Receiver operator characteristic

SSL:

Sagittal suture length

References

  1. Darwish R, Abdel-Aziz M, Nekiedy A, Sobh Z. Sex determination from chest measurements in a sample of Egyptian adults using multislice computed tomography. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017;52:154–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Selliah P, Martino F, Cummaudo M, Indra L, Biehler-Gomez L, Campobasso C, et al. Sex estimation of skeletons in middle and late adulthood: reliability of pelvic morphological traits and long bone metrics on an Italian skeletal collection. Int J Legal Med. 2020;134:1683–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Darwish R, Salama N, Elsirafy M, Kholeif W. Identification of sex from foramen magnum of Egyptian skulls using three dimensional computed tomography. Ain Shams J Forensic Med Clin Toxicol. 2014;22:74–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allam F, Allam M. Sex discrimination of mastoid process by anthropometric measurements using multidetector computed tomography in Egyptian adult population. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2016;6:361–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdelaleem S, Younis R, Kader M. Sex determination from the piriform aperture using multi slice computed tomography: Discriminant function analysis of Egyptian population in Mini governorate. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2016;6:429–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sherif N, Sheta A, Ibrahim M, Kaka R, Henaidy M. Evaluation of the paranasal sinuses dimensions in sex estimation among a sample of adult Egyptians using multidetector computed tomography. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2017;11:33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tubbs R, Bosmia A, Cohen-Gadol A. The human calvaria: a review of embryology, anatomy, pathology, and molecular development. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28:23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Agur A, Dalley A. Grant’s atlas of anatomy. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rogers T, Allard T. Expert testimony and positive identification of human remains through cranial suture patterns. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chiba F, Makino Y, Motomura A, Inokuchi G, Torimitsu S, Ishii N, et al. Age estimation by multidetector CT images of the sagittal suture. Int J Legal Med. 2013;127:1005–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Parchake S, Tumram N, Kasote A, Meshram M. Estimation of age from macroscopic sagittal suture closure in an Indian population. Sch J App Med Sci. 2015;3:249–56.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khandare S, Bhise S, Shinde A. Age estimation from cranial sutures: a postmortem study. Int J Biomed Res. 2015;3:192–202.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rao P, Menezes T, Kanchan T, Sowmya J, Yoganarasimha K, Aswinidutt R. Estimation of stature from cranial sutures in a South Indian male population. Int J Legal Med. 2009;123:271–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kolencherry T, Birngruber C, Ramsthaler F, Verhoff M, Kölzer S. Stature estimation from sagittal and coronal suture lengths for Central European individuals. Arch Kriminol. 2016;237:204–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Campobasso C, De Micco F, Bugelli V, Cavezza A, Rodriguez W, Pietra B. Undetected traumatic diastasis of cranial sutures: a case of child abuse. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;298:307–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar A, Rajesh B, Arumugam K, Tamilalagan V. Sutural bones associated with lambdoid suture of human skull: presence, variations and clinical importance. Int J Anat Res. 2016;4:2331–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goyal N, Garg A, Kumar Y. Incidence and medicolegal significance of wormian bones in human skulls in North India Region. Int J App Basic Med Res. 2019;9:165–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bushby K, Cole T, Matthews J, Goodship J. Centiles for adult head circumference. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67:1286–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Saukko P, Knight B. Knight’s forensic pathology. 4th ed. Broca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sinthubua A, Ruengdit S, Das S, Mahakkanukrauh P. A new method for sex estimation from maxillary suture length in a Thai population. Anat Cell Biol. 2017;50:261–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Narasimhamurthy S, Kumar R, Manjunath T, Kuppast N, Umesh S, ShradhaIddalgave R. Reliability of bregma-lambda length measurements in identification of sex of skull. Sch J App Med Sci. 2015;3:1467–70.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Talokar S, Lade S. Sexual dimorphism of human skull by different parameters Int J Sci Res. 2015;4:614–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Teodoru-Raghina D, Marinescu M, Diaconeasa A, Olteanu B, Perlea P, Dragu M. Crania sexual dimorphism of an European subpopulation: CT scan discriminant function analysis in a Romanian subadult casuistry. Rom J Leg Med. 2017;25:373–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Amin M, Hassan E. Sex identification in Egyptian population using multidetector computed tomography of the maxillary sinus. J Forensic Leg Med. 2012;19:65–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bolliger S, Thali M. Imaging and virtual autopsy: looking back and forward. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Quincey D, Carle G, Alunni V, Quatrehomme G. Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: A comparison of three methods. Sci Justice. 2013;53:253–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Latham K, Miller J. DNA recovery and analysis from skeletal material in modern forensic contexts. Forensic Sci Res. 2019;4:51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their deep gratitude to Professor Dr. Asmaa El-Banna and Professor Dr. Haidy Megahed for their enthusiastic encouragement and useful critiques of this research work.

Funding

Dr. Zahraa Khalifa Sobh and Dr. Ashraf Magdy Gheat declare that there is NO funding for this research. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Zahraa Khalifa Sobh contributioned to the conception, design of the work, analysis, interpretation of data and drafted the work. Dr. Ashraf Magdy Gheat conducted the practical part of the work and revised the drafted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahraa Khalifa Sobh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr. Zahraa Khalifa Sobh and Dr. Ashraf Magdy Gheat declare that they have NO competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University (IRB NO: 00012098, FWA NO: 00018699, Serial protocol NO: 0304640).

Adherence to national and international regulations

The Ethics Committee is constituted and operates according to ICH GCP Guidelines and applicable local and institutional regulations and guidelines which govern ethics committees operation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable as the research did not include any individual person’s data in any form.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sobh, Z.K., Gheat, A.M. Coronal and sagittal suture lengths as novel measurements for sex identification in a sample from the Egyptian population. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 17, 19–26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-020-00348-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-020-00348-8

Keywords

Navigation