Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of salivary and calculated free cortisol levels during low and standard dose of ACTH stimulation tests in healthy volunteers

  • Endocrine Methods and Techniques
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 June 2015

Abstract

Salivary cortisol (SC) has been increasingly used as a surrogate biomarker of free cortisol (FC) for the assessment of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, but there are not enough data regarding its use during ACTH stimulation tests. Therefore, we aimed to determine the responses of SC, calculated free cortisol (cFC) and free cortisol index (FCI) to ACTH stimulation tests in healthy adults. Forty-four healthy volunteers (24 men and 20 women) were included in the study. Low-dose (1 µg) and standard-dose (250 µg) ACTH stimulation tests were performed on two consecutive days. Basal and stimulated total cortisol (TC) and cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) levels and SC levels were measured during both doses of ACTH stimulation tests. cFC (by Coolens’ equation) and FCI levels were calculated from simultaneously measured TC and CBG levels. The minimum SC, cFC, FCI levels after low-dose ACTH stimulation test were 0.21, 0.33, 16.06 µg/dL, and after standard-dose ACTH were 0.85, 0.46, 26.11 µg/dL, respectively, in healthy individuals who all had TC responses higher than 20 µg/dL. Peak CBG levels after both doses of ACTH stimulation tests were found to be higher in women than in men. So, by its effect, peak cFC and FCI levels were found to be lower in female than in male group. Neither TC nor SC levels were affected by gender. cFC and FCI levels depend on CBG levels and they are affected by gender. Cut-off levels for SC, cFC, FCI levels after both low- and standard-dose ACTH stimulation are presented. Studies including patients with adrenal insufficiency would be helpful to see the diagnostic value of these suggested cut-off levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I.E. Widmer, J.J. Puder, C. Konig, H. Pargger, H.R. Zerkowski, J. Girard, B. Muller, Cortisol response in relation to the severity of stress and illness. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 90, 4579–4586 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Tanriverdi, Z. Karaca, K. Unluhizarci, F. Kelestimur, The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia syndrome. Stress 10, 13–25 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. J.F. Dunn, B.C. Nisula, D. Rodbard, Transport of steroid hormones: binding of 21 endogenous steroids to both testosterone-binding globulin and corticosteroid binding globulin in human plasma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 53, 58–68 (1981)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. T.G. Brien, Human corticosteroid binding globulin. Clin. Endocrinol. 14, 193–212 (1981)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A.H. Hamrahian, T.S. Oseni, B.M. Arafah, Measurements of serum free cortisol in critically ill patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 1629–1638 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. B.M. Arafah, F.J. Nishiyama, H. Tlaygeh, R. Hejal, Measurement of salivary cortisol concentration in the assessment of adrenal function in critically ill subjects: a surrogate marker of the circulating free cortisol. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92, 2965–2971 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Poomthavorn, R. Lertbunrian, A. Preutthipan, A. Sriphrapradang, P. Khlairit, P. Mahachoklertwattana, Serum free cortisol index, free cortisol, and total cortisol in critically ill children. Inten. Care Med. 35, 1281–1285 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Coolens, L., Van Baelen, H., Heyns, W.: Clinical use of unbound plasma cortisol as calculated from total cortisol and corticosteroid-binding globulin. J. Steroid Biochem. 26, 197–202 (1987)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. W.S. Gozansky, J.S. Lynn, M.L. Laudenslager, W.M. Kohrt, Salivary cortisol determined by enzyme immunoassay is preferable to serum total cortisol for assessment of dynamic hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity. Clin. Endocrinol. 63, 336–341 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Marcus-Perlman, K. Tordjman, Y. Greenman, R. Limor, G. Shenkerman, E. Osher, N. Stern, Low-dose ACTH (1 microg) salivary test: a potential alternative to the classical blood test. Clin. Endocrinol. 64, 215–218 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M.S. Lo, M.L. Ng, B.S. Azmy, B.A. Khalid, Clinical applications of salivary cortisol measurements. Singapore Med. J. 33, 170–173 (1992)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. L.N. Contreras, A.L. Arregger, G.G. Persi, N.S. Gonzalez, E.M. Cardoso, A new less-invasive and more informative low-dose ACTH test: salivary steroids in response to intramuscular corticotrophin. Clin. Endocrinol. 61, 675–682 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Deutschbein, M. Broecker-Preuss, J. Flitsch, A. Jaeger, R. Althoff, M.K. Walz, K. Mann, S. Petersenn, Salivary cortisol as a diagnostic tool for Cushing’s syndrome and adrenal insufficiency: improved screening by an automatic immunoassay. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 166, 613–618 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Simunkova, R. Hampl, M. Hill, J. Doucha, L. Starka, K. Vondra, Salivary cortisol in low dose (1 microg) ACTH test in healthy women: comparison with serum cortisol. Physiol. Res. 56, 449–453 (2007)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Simunkova, L. Starka, M. Hill, L. Kriz, R. Hampl, K. Vondra, Comparison of total and salivary cortisol in a low-dose ACTH (Synacthen) test: influence of three-month oral contraceptives administration to healthy women. Physiol. Res. 57, 193–199 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Arlt, Adrenal insufficiency. Clin Med. 8(2), 211–215 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Karaca, A. Lale, F. Tanriverdi, M. Kula, K. Unluhizarci, F. Kelestimur, The comparison of low and standard dose ACTH and glucagon stimulation tests in the evaluation of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in healthy adults. Pituitary 14, 134–140 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Beishuizen, L.G. Thijs, I. Vermes, Patterns of corticosteroid-binding globulin and the free cortisol index during septic shock and multitrauma. Inten. Care Med. 27, 1584–1591 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Topkas, P. Keith, G. Dimeski, J. Cooper-White, C. Punyadeera, Evaluation of saliva collection devices for the analysis of proteins. Clin. Chim. Acta 413, 66–70 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C.W. Le Roux, G.A. Chapman, W.M. Kong, W.S. Dhillo, J. Jones, J. Alaghband-Zadeh, Free cortisol index is better than serum total cortisol in determining hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal status in patients undergoing surgery. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88, 2045–2048 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. J.G. Lewis, M.G. Lewis, P. Elder, An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for corticosteroid-binding globulin using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies: decline in CBG following synthetic ACTH. Clin. Chim. Acta 328, 121–128 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. N.L. Barlow, J. Holme, R.A. Stockley, P.M. Clark, An evaluation of measured and calculated serum free cortisol in a group of patients with known adrenal suppression. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 47, 200–204 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fahrettin Kelestimur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elbuken, G., Tanriverdi, F., Karaca, Z. et al. Comparison of salivary and calculated free cortisol levels during low and standard dose of ACTH stimulation tests in healthy volunteers. Endocrine 48, 439–443 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0378-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0378-8

Keywords

Navigation