Abstract
This paper reports data and scholarly opinion that support the perception of systemic flaws in the management of scientific professions and the research enterprise; explores the responsibility that professional status places on the scientific professions, and elaborates the concept of the responsible conduct of research (RCR). Data are presented on research misconduct, availability of research guidelines, and perceived research quality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.S. House of Representatives (1981) Fraud in Biomedical Research. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science and Technology, 97th Congress, March 31–April 1, 1981, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process 1: 6, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process 1: 5–6, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Institute of Medicine (1989) The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences, p. 2, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
R.O.W. Sciences, Inc. (2001) Analysis of Guidelines for the Conduct of Research Adopted by Medical Schools or Their Components, Rockville, MD.
Institute of Medicine (1989) The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. p. 21. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Campbell, E.G., Weissman, J.S., Moy, E., Blumenthal, D. (2001) Status of Clinical Research in Academic Health Centers, JAMA 286 (Oct. 15): 7.
Chalk, R. (1999) Integrity in Science: Moving into the New Millennium, Science and Engineering Ethics 5:179–182.
Greenwood, Ernest (1966) Attributes of a Profession, in: Vollmer, H.M. and Mills, D.L. (eds.) Professionalization, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood, NJ; Moore, W.E. (1970) The Professions: Roles and Rules, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY; Wilson, L. (1995) Academic Man: A Study of a Profession, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ; Association of American Medical Colleges (1997) Developing a Code of Ethics in Research: A Guide for Scientific Societies, Washington, DC.
Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences, IOM, 1989; Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, NAS, 1992; the Report of the Commission on Research Integrity, DHHS, 1995; and the PHS Policy on Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research, 2000.
Institute of Medicine (1989) Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences, p. 6.
National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process 1: 4, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process 1: 17, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Office of Research Integrity, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or any other federal agency.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rhoades, L.J. Beyond conflict of interest: The responsible conduct of research. SCI ENG ETHICS 8, 459–468 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0068-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0068-4