Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond conflict of interest: The responsible conduct of research

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports data and scholarly opinion that support the perception of systemic flaws in the management of scientific professions and the research enterprise; explores the responsibility that professional status places on the scientific professions, and elaborates the concept of the responsible conduct of research (RCR). Data are presented on research misconduct, availability of research guidelines, and perceived research quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. House of Representatives (1981) Fraud in Biomedical Research. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science and Technology, 97th Congress, March 31–April 1, 1981, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process 1: 6, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process 1: 5–6, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Institute of Medicine (1989) The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences, p. 2, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.O.W. Sciences, Inc. (2001) Analysis of Guidelines for the Conduct of Research Adopted by Medical Schools or Their Components, Rockville, MD.

  6. Institute of Medicine (1989) The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. p. 21. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell, E.G., Weissman, J.S., Moy, E., Blumenthal, D. (2001) Status of Clinical Research in Academic Health Centers, JAMA 286 (Oct. 15): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chalk, R. (1999) Integrity in Science: Moving into the New Millennium, Science and Engineering Ethics 5:179–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenwood, Ernest (1966) Attributes of a Profession, in: Vollmer, H.M. and Mills, D.L. (eds.) Professionalization, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood, NJ; Moore, W.E. (1970) The Professions: Roles and Rules, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY; Wilson, L. (1995) Academic Man: A Study of a Profession, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ; Association of American Medical Colleges (1997) Developing a Code of Ethics in Research: A Guide for Scientific Societies, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences, IOM, 1989; Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, NAS, 1992; the Report of the Commission on Research Integrity, DHHS, 1995; and the PHS Policy on Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research, 2000.

  11. Institute of Medicine (1989) Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences, p. 6.

  12. National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process 1: 4, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process 1: 17, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence J. Rhoades Ph.D..

Additional information

The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Office of Research Integrity, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or any other federal agency.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rhoades, L.J. Beyond conflict of interest: The responsible conduct of research. SCI ENG ETHICS 8, 459–468 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0068-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0068-4

Keywords

Navigation