Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utilization of Regional Anesthesia in the Electrophysiology Lab: A Narrative Review

  • Acute Pain Medicine (R Urman, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The electrophysiology lab is an important source of growth of anesthetic volume as the indications and evidence for catheter ablations and various cardiac implantable electronic devices improve. Paired with this increase in volume is an increasing number of patients with substantial comorbid conditions presenting for their EP procedures. For these patients, the interaction between their comorbidities and traditional anesthesia practices may create the risk of hemodynamic instability, cardiovascular or respiratory complications, and potential need for prolonged post-operative monitoring negatively impacting length of hospital stay.

Recent Findings

Regional anesthetic techniques, including pectoralis, serratus, and erector spinae plane blocks, offer options for both regional analgesia and surgical anesthesia for a variety of EP procedures. Existing case reports and extrapolations from other areas support these techniques as viable, safe, and effective components of an anesthetic plan.

Summary

In this article, we will review the development and challenges of various EP procedures and how different regional anesthetic techniques can function as a component of the anesthesia plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •  Of importance

  1. • Du AL, Robbins K, Waterman RS, et al. National trends in nonoperating room anesthesia: procedures, facilities, and patient characteristics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021;34(4):464–9. Retrospective study demonstrating the substantial growth in nonoperating room procedures and the impact of this growth on anesthesia services.

  2. Lu AC, Wald SH, Sun EC. Into the wilderness?: The growing importance of nonoperating room anesthesia care in the United States. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(4):1044–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kornej J, Borschel CS, Benjamin EJ, et al. Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in the 21st century: novel methods and new insights. Circ Res. 2020;127(1):4–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Parameswaran R, Al-Kaisey AM, Kalman JM. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: current indications and evolving technologies. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(3):210–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu JC, Darden D, Du C, et al. Initial findings from the national cardiovascular data registry of atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(9):867–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghzally Y, Ahmed I, Gerasimon G. Catheter ablation. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) 2023.

  7. Vladinov G, Fermin L, Longini R, et al. Choosing the anesthetic and sedative drugs for supraventricular tachycardia ablations: a focused review. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41(11):1555–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Steffen MM, Osborn JS, Cutler MJ. Cardiac implantable electronic device therapy: permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization devices. Med Clin North Am. 2019;103(5):931–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kozlowski B. [Commentary to the article: Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1329–38]. Kardiol Pol. 2009;67(12):1417–8.

  10. Kober L, Thune JJ, Nielsen JC, et al. Defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(13):1221–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Groeneveld PW, Dixit S. Cardiac pacing and defibrillation devices: cost and effectiveness. Annu Rev Med. 2017;68:1–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman P, Murgatroyd F, Boersma LVA, et al. Efficacy and safety of an extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(14):1292–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Knops RE, Olde Nordkamp LRA, Delnoy PHM, et al. Subcutaneous or transvenous defibrillator therapy. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):526–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kleemann T, Becker T, Doenges K, et al. Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period of >10 years. Circulation. 2007;115(19):2474–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdin A, Aktaa S. Subcutaneous ICD for more and transvenous ICD for few?! Clin Res Cardiol. 2022;111(5):475–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brouwer TF, Miller MA, Quast AB, et al. Implantation of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: an evaluation of 4 implantation techniques. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10(1):e004663.

  17. Miller MA, Bhatt HV, Weiner M, et al. Implantation of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with truncal plane blocks. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(7):1108–11.

  18. • Zhang Y, Min J, Chen S. Analgesic efficacy of regional anesthesia of the hemithorax in patients undergoing subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(11):3288–93. First randomized trial to demonstrate the clinical utility of regional anesthesia in the anesthetic management of patients in the EP lab.

  19. Shariat A, Ghia S, Gui JL, et al. Use of serratus anterior plane and transversus thoracis plane blocks for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation decreases intraoperative opioid requirements. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(11):3294–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang JK, Char DS, Motonaga KS, et al. Pectoral nerve blocks decrease postoperative pain and opioid use after pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement in children. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(8):1346–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mavarez AC, Ripat CI, Suarez MR. Pectoralis plane block for pacemaker insertion: a successful primary anesthetic. Front Surg. 2019;6:64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Elders J, AlHashimi H, Gomes M, et al. Subcutaneous ICD implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: single-center experience in the Netherlands. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022;38:100949.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Droghetti A, Basso Ricci E, Scimia P, et al. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block combined with the two-incision technique for subcutaneous ICD implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41(5):517–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Krishna SN, Chauhan S, Bhoi D, et al. Bilateral erector spinae plane block for acute post-surgical pain in adult cardiac surgical patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(2):368–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang J, He Y, Wang S, et al. The erector spinae plane block causes only cutaneous sensory loss on ipsilateral posterior thorax: a prospective observational volunteer study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20(1):88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. • Hasak L, Jagielak D, Lango R, et al. Pain control with ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block compared with local infiltration anesthesia in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a prospective randomized trial. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2019;33:S86-S7. Randomized trial showing the benefit to femoral nerve blocks for transcatheter procedures requiring a femoral artery approach.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ethan Y. Brovman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.t

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oh, D., Stapleton, G. & Brovman, E.Y. Utilization of Regional Anesthesia in the Electrophysiology Lab: A Narrative Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 27, 455–459 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-023-01147-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-023-01147-w

Keywords

Navigation