Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Migraine and Gastroparesis

  • Headache (R.B. Halker Singh and J. VanderPluym, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposeof Review

Migraine is a chronic and disabling disease affecting a significant proportion of the world’s population. There is evidence that gastroparesis, a gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility disorder in which transit of gastric contents is delayed, can occur in the setting of migraine. This article aims to review recent literature on overlap in the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of migraine and gastroparesis and highlight management considerations when these disorders coexist.

Recent Findings

There has been increasing recognition of the importance of the connection between the GI tract and the brain, and mounting evidence for the overlap in the pathophysiology of migraine and gastroparesis specifically. There exists a complex interplay between the central, autonomic, and enteric nervous systems. Studies show that gastroparesis may be present during and between acute migraine attacks necessitating modification of management to optimize outcomes.

Summary

Gastric dysmotility in the setting of migraine can impact absorption of oral migraine medications and alternate formulations should be considered for some patients. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation has been FDA cleared for migraine treatment and is also being studied in gastroparesis. Dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system is a significant feature in the pathophysiology of gut motility and migraine, making treatments that modulate the vagus nerve attractive for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance

  1. • Aurora SK, Shrewsbury SB, Ray S, Hindiyeh N, Nguyen L. A link between gastrointestinal disorders and migraine: insights into the gut-brain connection. Headache. 2021;61:576–89. Excellent review on GI disorders in addition to gastroparesis that are associated with migraine.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen LA, Snape WJ. Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of gastroparesis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015;44:21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Parkman HP. Migraine and gastroparesis from a gastroenterologist’s perspective. Headache. 2013;53(Suppl 1):4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. • Ye Y, Yin Y, Huh SY, Almansa C, Bennett D, Camilleri M. Epidemiology, etiology, and treatment of gastroparesis: real-world evidence from a large US national claims database. Gastroenterology. 2022;162:109-121.e5. Most recent study on the epidemiology of gastroparesis.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burch R, Rizzoli P, Loder E. The prevalence and impact of migraine and severe headache in the United States: updated age, sex, and socioeconomic-specific estimates from government health surveys. Headache. 2021;61:60–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dodick DW. Migraine. Lancet. 2018;391:1315–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yalcin H, Okuyucu EE, Ucar E, Duman T, Yilmazer S. Changes in liquid emptying in migraine patients: diagnosed with liquid phase gastric emptying scintigraphy. Intern Med J. 2012;42:455–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Volans GN. Migraine and drug absorption. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1978;3:313–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aurora S, Kori S, Barrodale P, Nelsen A, McDonald S. Gastric stasis occurs in spontaneous, visually induced, and interictal migraine. Headache. 2007;47:1443–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aurora SK, Kori SH, Barrodale P, McDonald SA, Haseley D. Gastric stasis in migraine: more than just a paroxysmal abnormality during a migraine attack. Headache. 2006;46:57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boyle R, Behan PO, Sutton JA. A correlation between severity of migraine and delayed gastric emptying measured by an epigastric impedance method. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;30:405–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu YH, Jo Y, Jung JY, Kim BK, Seok JW. Gastric emptying in migraine: a comparison with functional dyspepsia. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;18:412–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stanghellini V, Chan FKL, Hasler WL, Malagelada JR, Suzuki H, Tack J, Talley NJ. Gastroduodenal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1380–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, et al. Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:753–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tougas G, Eaker EY, Abell TL, et al. Assessment of gastric emptying using a low fat meal: establishment of international control values. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1456–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jehangir A, Parkman HP. Role of gastric emptying in symptoms of gastroparesis. Gastrointestinal Disorders. 2019;1:391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo JP, Maurer AH, Fisher RS, Parkman HP. Extending gastric emptying scintigraphy from two to four hours detects more patients with gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46:24–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sullivan A, Temperley L, Ruban A. Pathophysiology, aetiology and treatment of gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65:1615–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grover M, Farrugia G, Lurken MS, et al. Cellular changes in diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1575-1585.e8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Koch KL, Calles-Escandón J. Diabetic gastroparesis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015;44:39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pasricha PJ, Grover M, Yates KP, et al. Progress in gastroparesis – a narrative review of the work of the Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;S1542-3565(22):00533–X.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dodick DW. A phase-by-phase review of migraine pathophysiology. Headache: J Head Face Pain. 2018;58:4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maniyar FH, Sprenger T, Schankin C, Goadsby PJ. The origin of nausea in migraine-a PET study. J Headache Pain. 2014;15:84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yuan CS, Barber WD. Area postrema: gastric vagal input from proximal stomach and interactions with nucleus tractus solitarius in cat. Brain Res Bull. 1993;30:119–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Boissonade FM, Sharkey KA, Davison JS. Fos expression in ferret dorsal vagal complex after peripheral emetic stimuli. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:R1118-1126.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shapiro RE, Miselis RR. The central neural connections of the area postrema of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1985;234:344–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Straube A, Ellrich J, Eren O, Blum B, Ruscheweyh R. Treatment of chronic migraine with transcutaneous stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagal nerve (auricular t-VNS): a randomized, monocentric clinical trial. J Headache Pain. 2015;16:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Akerman S, Simon B, Romero-Reyes M. Vagus nerve stimulation suppresses acute noxious activation of trigeminocervical neurons in animal models of primary headache. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;102:96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li N, Liu L, Sun M, Wang R, Jin W, Liu C, Hu Y. Predominant role of gut-vagus-brain neuronal pathway in postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from an observational cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21:234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Beh SC. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation for nausea prevention during BPPV treatment. Neuromodulation. 2020;23:886–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sj T, Am R, Fd S. Mechanisms of action of the 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(7):1084–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.59.7.1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Charbit AR, Akerman S, Goadsby PJ. Dopamine: what’s new in migraine? Curr Opin Neurol. 2010;23:275–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ho TW, Edvinsson L, Goadsby PJ. CGRP and its receptors provide new insights into migraine pathophysiology. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:573–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Holzer P, Farzi A. Neuropeptides and the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;817:195–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Falkenberg K, Bjerg HR, Olesen J. Two-hour CGRP infusion causes gastrointestinal hyperactivity: possible relevance for CGRP antibody treatment. Headache. 2020;60:929–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaufman J, Levine I. Acute gastric dilatation of stomach during attack of migraine. Radiology. 1936;27:301–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. (2016) 2nd Federation of Neurogastroenterology and Motility Meeting, 25–28 August 2016, Hyatt Regency San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. NeurogastroenterolMotil 28(1):5–108

  38. Togha M, Martami F, Jafari E, Ariyanfar S, Hashemi SM. The prevalence and characteristics of visceral autonomic symptoms among migraineurs: a population-based study. Cephalalgia. 2022;42:500–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. • Gottfried-Blackmore A, Adler EP, Fernandez-Becker N, Clarke J, Habtezion A, Nguyen L. Open-label pilot study: non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation improves symptoms and gastric emptying in patients with idiopathic gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32: e13769. Evidence for the use of non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation for the treatment of gastroparesis.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. • Paulon E, Nastou D, Jaboli F, Marin J, Liebler E, Epstein O. Proof of concept: short-term non-invasive cervical vagus nerve stimulation in patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017;8:325–30. Evidence for the use of non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation for the treatment of gastroparesis.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tassorelli C, Grazzi L, de Tommaso M, et al. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation as acute therapy for migraine: the randomized PRESTO study. Neurology. 2018;91:e364–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lacy BE, Tack J, Gyawali CP. AGA clinical practice update on management of medically refractory gastroparesis: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20:491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Camilleri M, Chedid V, Ford AC, Haruma K, Horowitz M, Jones KL, Low PA, Park S-Y, Parkman HP, Stanghellini V. Gastroparesis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu N, Abell T. Gastroparesis updates on pathogenesis and management. Gut Liver. 2017;11:579–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Navari RM, Schwartzberg LS. Evolving role of neurokinin 1-receptor antagonists for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:6459–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hasler WL, Wilson LA, Parkman HP, et al. Factors related to abdominal pain in gastroparesis: contrast to patients with predominant nausea and vomiting. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(427–438):e300-301.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Abdelfatah MM, Noll A, Kapil N, et al. Long-term outcome of gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy in treatment of gastroparesis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19:816–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Aurora SK, Papapetropoulos S, Kori SH, Kedar A, Abell TL. Gastric stasis in migraineurs: etiology, characteristics, and clinical and therapeutic implications. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:408–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ferrari A, Tiraferri I, Neri L, Sternieri E. Why pharmacokinetic differences among oral triptans have little clinical importance: a comment. J Headache Pain. 2011;12:5–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Assadpour S, Shiran MR, Asadi P, Akhtari J, Sahebkar A. Harnessing intranasal delivery systems of sumatriptan for the treatment of migraine. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:3692065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tepper SJ, Johnstone MR. Breath-powered sumatriptan dry nasal powder: an intranasal medication delivery system for acute treatment of migraine. MDER. 2018;11:147–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Djupesland PG, Skretting A. Nasal deposition and clearance in man: comparison of a bidirectional powder device and a traditional liquid spray pump. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2012;25:280–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lipton RB, McGinley JS, Shulman KJ, Silberstein SD, Wirth RJ, Buse DC. AVP-825 (sumatriptan nasal powder) reduces nausea compared to sumatriptan tablets: results of the COMPASS Randomized Clinical Trial. Headache. 2018;58:229–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Cameron C, Kelly S, Hsieh S-C, et al. Triptans in the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Headache. 2015;55(Suppl 4):221–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Smith TR, Winner P, Aurora SK, Jeleva M, Hocevar-Trnka J, Shrewsbury SB. STOP 301: a phase 3, open-label study of safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of INP104, Precision Olfactory Delivery (POD®) of dihydroergotamine mesylate, over 24/52 weeks in acute treatment of migraine attacks in adult patients. Headache. 2021;61:1214–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Albrecht D, Iwashima M, Dillon D, Harris S, Levy J. A phase 1, randomized, open-label, safety, tolerability, and comparative bioavailability study of intranasal dihydroergotamine powder (STS101), intramuscular dihydroergotamine mesylate, and intranasal DHE mesylate spray in healthy adult subjects. Headache. 2020;60:701–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Chou DE, Tso AR, Goadsby PJ. Aprepitant for the management of nausea with inpatient IV dihydroergotamine. Neurology. 2016;87:1613–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. NURTEC® ODT (rimegepant) receives additional approval for preventive treatment for adult patients with episodic migraine. In: American Headache Society. https://americanheadachesociety.org/news/nurtec-odt-rimegepant-receives-additional-approval-for-preventive-treatment-for-adult-patients-with-episodic-migraine/. Accessed 25 Jul 2022

  59. Moreno-Ajona D, Pérez-Rodríguez A, Goadsby PJ. Gepants, calcitonin-gene-related peptide receptor antagonists: what could be their role in migraine treatment? Curr Opin Neurol. 2020;33:309–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Singh-Franco D, Wolowich WR, De La Rosa D. Intranasal metoclopramide for acute and recurrent diabetic gastroparesis in adults. Drugs Ther Perspect. 2021;37:581–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. VanderPluym JH, Halker Singh RB, Urtecho M, et al. Acute treatments for episodic migraine in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2021;325:2357–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Eli Lilly and Company (2022) A phase 4 single-blind study of gastrointestinal transit time in adult patients with migraine before and after initiation of a mAb CGRP antagonist. clinicaltrials.gov

  63. Escher CM, Paracka L, Dressler D, Kollewe K. Botulinum toxin in the management of chronic migraine: clinical evidence and experience. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2017;10:127–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Inan LE, Inan N, Unal-Artık HA, Atac C, Babaoglu G. Greater occipital nerve block in migraine prophylaxis: narrative review. Cephalalgia. 2019;39:908–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karissa N. Arca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors do not have existing conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Headache.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arca, K.N., Cai, J., Wang, F. et al. Migraine and Gastroparesis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 22, 813–821 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-022-01241-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-022-01241-3

Keywords

Navigation