Abstract
Minimizing delays is a crucial step in improving outcomes with acute stroke therapies whose efficacy is clearly time dependent. Logistic and human barriers to rapid stroke care can be overcome with a systematic “Code Stroke” approach provided by a structured multidisciplinary acute stroke response team. Such teams should include Emergency Medical Services providers, neurologists, neurosurgeons, diagnostic radiologists, nurses, radiology technicians, laboratory personnel, hospital administrators, and emergency medicine, intensive care, and neurointerventional physicians. An acute stroke team improves treatment practices and provides a gratifying experience for patients, families, and referring physicians. On the other hand, maintaining proficiency of the team’s operation is time consuming and personally onerous for team responders. Successful maintenance requires strong departmental and institutional commitment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Saver JL: Time is brain—quantified. Stroke 2006, 7:263–266.
Marler JR, Tilley BC, Lu M, et al.: Early stroke treatment associated with better outcome: the NINDS rt-PA stroke study. Neurology 2000, 55:1649–1655.
Ramanujam P, Guluma KZ, Castillo EM, et al.: Accuracy of stroke recognition by emergency medical dispatchers and paramedics—San Diego experience. Prehosp Emerg Care 2008, 12:307–313.
Kothari RU, Pancioli A, Liu T, et al.: Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale: reproducibility and validity. Ann Emerg Med 1999, 33:373–378.
Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Eckstein M, et al.: Identifying stroke in the field. Prospective validation of the Los Angeles prehospital stroke screen (LAPSS). Stroke 2000, 31:71–76.
Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, et al.: Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Circulation 2007, 115:e478–e534.
Gordon DL, Issenberg SB, Gordon MS, et al.: Stroke training of prehospital providers: an example of simulation-enhanced blended learning and evaluation. Med Teach 2005, 27:114–121.
Morris DL, Rosamond W, Madden K, et al.: Prehospital and emergency department delays after acute stroke: the Genentech Stroke Presentation Survey. Stroke 2000, 31:2585–2590.
Gomez CR, Malkoff MD, Sauer CM, et al.: Code stroke. An attempt to shorten inhospital therapeutic delays. Stroke 1994, 25:1920–1923.
Semplicini A, Benetton V, Macchini L, et al.: Intravenous thrombolysis in the emergency department for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Emerg Med J 2008, 25:403–406.
Adams HP Jr, Brott TG, Furlan AJ, et al.: Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke: a supplement to the guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. A statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation 1996, 94:1167–1174.
de la Ossa NP, Sanchez-Ojanguren J, Palomeras E, et al.: Influence of the stroke code activation source on the outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients. Neurology 2008, 70:1238–1243.
Hamidon BB, Dewey HM: Impact of acute stroke team emergency calls on in-hospital delays in acute stroke care. J Clin Neurosci 2007, 14:831–834.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leira, E.C., Ahmed, A. Development of an emergency department response to acute stroke (“Code stroke”). Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 9, 35–40 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-009-0006-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-009-0006-9