Abstract
Substantial research has demonstrated the value of using risk assessment tools for the prediction and management of violence risk, including for intimate partner violence (IPV) (Mills, Kroner, and Morgan 2011). Such tools have been advocated for use by police officers (Hilton, Grant, and Rice 2010), but little is known about police officers’ perceptions of using these tools to inform their decision-making. Using a sample of 159 Canadian police officers (73% male, M age = 41.8 years, SD = 8.9), the current study examined police officer’s experiences with IPV risk tools, their attitudes about using such tools, and identified predictors of these attitudes using an online survey. Most of this sample had previously used an IPV risk tool, which was most commonly the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (64.1%). Most police officers rated use of risk tools as at least somewhat to extremely helpful (73.5%), and 67.4% indicated that they would use a risk tool with sufficient training on it. Regression analyses indicated that police officers’ perceived IPV risk tool usefulness was significantly predicted by older respondent age and greater perceived need for guidance in responding to IPV calls. In conclusion, most police officers view IPV risk screening as valuable for informing their responses to such calls for service and are likely to embrace such decision-aids with sufficient training on their potential impact for enhancing safety.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams AE, Bybee D, Tolman RM, Sullivan CM, Kennedy AC (2013) Does job stability mediate the relationship between intimate partner violence and mental health among low-income women? Am J Orthopsychiatry 83(4):600–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajop.12053
Ansara DL, Hindin MJ (2010) Formal and informal help-seeking associated with women’s and men’s experiences of intimate partner violence in Canada. Soc Sci Med 70(7):1011–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.009
Aubrey R and Hough M (1997) Assessing offenders’ needs: assessment scales for the probation service. Home Office Research Study 166, London: UK; Home Office
Ballucci D, Gill C, Campbell MA (2017) The power of attitude: the role of police culture and receptivity of risk assessment tools in IPV calls. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 11(3):242–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pax018
Belfrage H, Strand S (2012) Measuring the outcome of structured spousal violence risk assessment using the B-SAFER: risk in relation to recidivism and intervention. Behav Sci Law 30(4):420–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2019
Belfrage H, Strang S, Storey JE, Gibas AL, Kropp PR, Hart SD (2012) Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. Law Hum Behav 36(1):60–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093948
Blaney E (2010) Police officers’ views of specialized intimate partner violence training. Policing: An Int J Police Strateg Manag 33(2):354–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511011044939
Bonta J, Andrews D (2010) Viewing offender assessment and rehabilitation through the lens of the risk-need-responsivity model. In: McNeill F, Raynor P, Trotter C (eds) Offender supervision: new directions in theory, research and practice. Willan, Oxon, pp 19–64
Breul N, Keith M (2016) Deadly calls and fatal encounters: Analysis of U.S. law enforcement line of duty deaths when officers responded to dispatched calls for service and conducted enforcement (2010–2014). National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund. Retrieved from http://www.nleomf.org/assets/pdfs/officer-safety/Primary-Research-Final-8-2-16.pdf
Burczycka M, Conroy S (2017) Family violence in Canada: a statistical profile, 2015. Juristat, Catelogue no. 85–002-X, ISSN 1209–6393, Ottawa, ON; Statistics Canada/Ministry of Industry. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2017001/article/14698-eng.pdf
Campbell MA, French S, Gendreau P (2009) The prediction of violence in adult offenders: a meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Crim Justice Behav 36(6):567–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809333610
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics (2016). Family violence in Canada: a statistical profile, 2014. Ottawa, ON; Statistics Canada/Ministry of Industry. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2016001/article/14303-eng.pdf
Cattaneo LB, Chapman AR (2011) Risk assessment with victims of intimate partner violence: investigating the gap between research and practice. Violence Against Women 17(10):1286–1298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211424477
Cooper A and Smith EL (2011) Homicide trends in the United States, 1980–2008 (NCJ 236018). Washington, DC; Bureau of Justice Statistics Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf
Cotter, A. (2014). Homicide in Canada, 2013. Juristat, Statistics Canada Categlogue no. 85–002-X. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2014001/article/14108-eng.pdf
Crime Prevention and Policing Standards (2013) New Brunswick Police Human Resources 2013 Survey Report. Fredericton, New Brunswick; Department of Public Safety, Government of New Brunswick. Retrieved from http://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/ps-sp/pdf/Safety_Protection/NBPoliceHumanResources.pdf
DeJong C, Burgess-Proctor A, Elis L (2008) Police officer perceptions of intimate partner violence: an analysis of observational data. Violence Vict 23(6):683–696. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.6.683
Devries KM, Mak JYT, García-Moreno C, Petzold M, Child JC, Falder G, Watts CH (2013) The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science 340(6140):1527–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240937
Ǣgisdóttir, S., White, M.J., Spengler, P.M., Maugherman, A. S., Anderson, L.A., Cook, R. S. et al. (2006). Couns Psychol, 34, 341–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005285875, 3
Ellis D, Choi A, Blaus C (1993) Injuries to police officers attending domestic disturbances: an empirical study. Canadian Journal of Criminology, April, pp 149–168
Finneran C, Stephenson R (2012) Intimate partner violence among men who have sex with men: a systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 14(2):168–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012470034
Garcia E, Garcia F, Lia M (2011) Police attitudes towards policing partner violence against women: do they correspond to different psychosocial profiles? J Interpersonal Violence 26(1):189–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626260510362892
Garcia E, Garcia F, Lia M (2014) Male police officers’ law enforcement preferences in cases of intimate partner violence versus non-intimate interpersonal violence. Crim Justice Behav 41(10):1195–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814541655
Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH (2006) Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings form the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet 368(9543):1260–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8
Gauthier S (2009) Police release with conditions of the accused in cases of domestic violence in Montreal, Canada. Crim Crim Justice 9(1):51–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895808099180
Gover AR, Paul DP, Dodge M (2011) Law enforcement officers’ attitudes about domestic violence. Violence Against Women 17(5):619–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211407477
Gundhus HI (2012) Experience or knowledge? Perspectives on new knowledge regimes and control of police professionalism. Policing 7(2):178–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pas039
Guy LS, Nelson RJ, Fusco-Morin SL, Vincent G (2014) What do juvenile probation officers think of using the SAVRY and LS/CMI for case management, and do they use the instruments properly? Int J Forensic Mental Health 13(3):227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.939789
Hannah-Moffat K and Maurotto P (2003) Youth risk/need assessment: an overview of issues and practices. RR03YJ-4e, Ottawa, ON; Department of Justice Canada. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/yj-jj/rr03_yj4-rr03_jj4/rr03_yj4.pdf
Hanson RK (2009) The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence. Can Psychol 50(3):172–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015726
Harris GT, Rice ME, Quinsey VL and Cormier CA (2015) Criticisms of actuarial risk assessment (pp. 195–222). In Authors, Violent offenders: appraising and managing risk (third edition), Washington, DC; American Psychological Association
Helms L, Bourgon G (2011) Taking stock of 15 years of research on the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA): a critical review. Int J Forensic Mental Health 10(1):64–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.551709
Heyman RE, Smith Slep AM, Foran HM (2015) Enhanced definitions of intimate partner violence for DSM-5 and ICD-11 may promote improved screening and treatment. Fam Process 54:64–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12121
Hilton NZ, Harris GT and Rice ME (2010) Risk assessment for domestically violence men: tools for criminal justice, offender intervention, and victim services. Washington, DC; American Psychological Association
Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME, Lang C, Cormier CA, Lines KJ (2004) A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: the Ontario domestic assault risk assessment. Psychol Assess 16(3):267–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.267
Hilton NZ, Popham S, Lang C, Harris GT (2014) Preliminary validation of the ODARA for female intimate partner violence offenders. Partner Abuse 5(2):189–203. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.5.2.189
Holmes MR (2013) The sleeper effect of intimate partner violence exposure: long-term consequences on young children’s aggressive behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 54(9):986–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12071
Horowitz SH, Mitchell D, LaRussa-Trott M, Santiago L, Pearson J, Skiff DM, Cerulli C (2011) An inside view of police officers’ experience with domestic violence. J Fam Violence 26(8):617–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9396-y
Hoyle C (1998) Negotiating domestic violence: police, criminal justice and victims. Oxford, UK; Clarendon
Hoyle C (2008) Will she be safe? A critical analysis of risk assessment in domestic violence cases. Child Youth Serv Rev 30(3):323–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.10.009
Huey L, Ricciardelli R (2016) From seeds to orchards: using evidence-based policing to address Canada’s policing research needs. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 58(1):119–131. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj2015.E24
Kane RJ (1999) Patterns of arrest in domestic violence encounters. Identifying a police decision-making model. J Crim Just 27(1):65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(98)00037-3
Kane RJ (2000) Police responses to restraining orders in domestic violence incidents: identifying the custody-threshold thesis. Crim Justice Behav 27(5):561–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854800027005002
Kropp PR (2004) Some questions regarding spousal risk assessment. Violence Against Women 10(6):676–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204265019
Kropp PR (2008a) Development of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA) and the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER). In A. C. Baldry and F. W. Winkel (Eds). Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: the risk assessment and management approach (pp 19–31). Hauppauge, NY; Nova Science Publishers
Kropp PR (2008b) Intimate partner violence risk assessment and management. Violence Vict 23(2):202–220. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.2.202
Kropp PR Hart SD and Belfrage H. (2005) Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER): user manual. Vancouver, Canada; Proactive Resolutions
Kropp PR, Hart SD, Webster CD, Eaves D (1994) Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. British Columbia Institute on Family Violence, Vancouver, BC
Lila M, Garcia E, Garcia F (2013) Ambivalent sexism, empathy and law enforcement attitudes towards partner violence against women among male police officers. Psychol Crime Law 19(10):907–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.719619
Lockwood D, Prohaska A (2015) Police officer gender and attitudes towards intimate partner violence: how policy can eliminate stereotypes. Int J Crim Justice Sci 10:77–90 Retrieved from http://www.sascv.org/ijcjs/pdfs/lockwoodprohaskaijcjs2015vol10issue1.pdf
Martin-Storey A (2015) Prevalence of dating violence among sexual minority youth: variation across gender, sexual minority identity and gender of sexual partners. J Youth Adolesc 44(1):211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0089-0
Mazeika D, Bartholomew B, Distler M, Thomas K, Greenman S, Pratt S (2010) Trends in police research: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2000–2007 literature. Police Pract Res 11(6):520–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2010.497390
McPhedran S, Gover A, Mazerolle P (2017) A cross-national comparison of police attitudes about domestic violence: a focus on gender. Policing: An Int J Police Strateg Manag 40(2):214–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0083
Messing JT, Campbell J, Webster DW, Brown S, Patchell B, Wilson JS (2015) Oklahoma lethality assessment study: a quasi-experimental evaluation of the Lethality Assessment Program. Soc Serv Rev 89(3):499–530. https://doi.org/10.1086/683194
Messing JT, Thaller J (2013) The average predictive validity of intimate partner violence risk assessment instruments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28(7):1537–1558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512468250
Mills JF, Kroner DG and Morgan RD (2011) Clinician’s guide to violence risk assessment. New York; Gilford Press
Ratcliffe J (2008) Intelligence-led policing. London, UK; Routledge
Retief R, Green S (2015) Some challenges in policing domestic violence. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk 51:135–147 Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/sw/v51n1/08.pdf
Ruff L (2012) Does training matter? Exploring police officer response to domestic dispute calls before and after training on intimate partner violence. The Police Journal 85(4):285–300. https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2012.85.4.516
Schneider AL, Ervin L, Snyder-Joy Z (1996) Further exploration of the flight from discretion: the role of risk/need instruments in probation supervision decisions. J Crime Justice 24(2):109–121
Sherman LW (2015) A tipping point for “totally evidence policing”: ten ideas for building an evidence-based police agency. International Criminal Justice Review 25(1):11–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567715574372
Simmons SB, Knight KE, Menard S (2015) Consequences of intimate partner violence on substance use and depression for women and men. J Fam Violence 30(3):351–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9691-0
Singh JP, Fazel S (2010) Forensic risk assessment: a metareview. Criminal Justice & Behavior 37(9):965–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810374274
Stockman JK, Hayashi H, Campbell JC (2015) Intimate partner violence and its health impact on ethnic minority women. J Women’s Health 24(1):62–79. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.4879
Storey JE, Strand S (2013) Assessing violence risk among female IPV perpetrators: an examination of the B-SAFER. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma 22(9):964–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2013.835015
Storey JE, Gibas AL, Reeves KA, Hart SD (2011) Evaluation of a violence risk (threat) assessment training program for police and other criminal justice professionals. Crim Justice Behav 38(6):554–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811403123
Storey JE, Kropp PR, Hart SD, Belfrage H, Strand S (2014) Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the evaluation of risk. Crim Justice Behav 41:256–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813503960
Stöckl H, Devries K, Rotstein A, Abrahams N, Campbell J, Watts C, Moreno CC (2013) The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review. Lancet 382(9895):859–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61030-2
Stults CB, Javdani S, Greenbaum CA, Barton SC, Kapadia F, Halkitis PN (2015) Intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization among YMSM: the P18 cohort study. Psychol Sex Orientation Gend Divers 2(2):152–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000104
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2013) Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn. Pearson, Boston, MA
Telep CW (2017) Police officer receptivity to research and evidence-based policing: examining variability within and across agencies. Crime and Delinquency 63(8):976–999. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287016642253
Telep CW, Lum C (2014) The receptivity of officers to empirical research and evidence-based policing: an examination of survey data from three agencies. Police Quarterly 17(4):359–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611114548099
Tjaden P, Thoennes N (2000) Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence against Women Survey. Violence Against Women 6(2):142–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010022181769
Trujillo MP, Ross S (2008) Police response to domestic violence: making decisions about risk and risk management. J Interpersonal Violence 23(4):454–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507312943
Vyas S, Watts C (2009) How does economic empowerment affect women’s risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published evidence. J Int Dev 21(5):577–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1500
Ward-Lasher A, Messing JT, Hart B (2017) Policing intimate partner violence: attitudes toward risk assessment and collaboration with social workers. Soc Work 62(3):211–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swx023
Weisberg DK (2016) Innovation intervention by police reduces intimate partner revictimization. Domestic Violence Report 21(4):59
Whitelaw B, Parent RB (2010) Community-based strategic policing in Canada (3rd edition). Nelson, Toronto
Williamson T (2008) The handbook of knowledge-based policing: current conceptions and future directions. Wiley, Chichester
Wynn M (2015) Safety planning for our first responders. Domestic Violence Report 20:64–69
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by an Insight Development Grant from the Social Sciences and Research Humanities Council of Canada awarded to Carmen Gill as principle investigator and Dale Ballucci and Mary Ann Campbell as co-investigators.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Statement
The study was approved by the Human Ethics Research Board of the University of New Brunswick - Fredericton Campus. In accordance with the 2014 Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to inclusion in the study, and all data collected was free of personal identifying information to protect the privacy of participants.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, M.A., Gill, C. & Ballucci, D. Informing Police Response to Intimate Partner Violence: Predictors of Perceived Usefulness of Risk Assessment Screening. J Police Crim Psych 33, 175–187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-017-9244-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-017-9244-y