Abstract
In these times of increased tensions between police officers and their communities, the need for effective police leadership is more important than ever. Past research suggests that a transformational style of leadership is preferred by most officers, with supervisors who are good communicators, trustworthy, effective at training officers for changing times, and able to create a shared cooperative vision. The present study developed a new Transformational Police Leadership Scale (TPLS) that police departments might eventually use to assess supervisor leadership characteristics. Participants included 152 US police officers who completed anonymous surveys to report demographics, to rate leadership behaviors of immediate supervisors, and to report their psychosocial well-being (self-esteem, perceived police social support, romantic partner conflict). Exploratory factor analysis produced a 20-item TPLS with three dimensions showing acceptable internal reliability and test-retest reliability: Clear Communication, Training and Cooperation, and Fairness and Honesty. The three TPLS dimensions were not associated with demographics (age, gender, marital status, college education, patrol officer rank, years of service), suggesting their relevance to a variety of officers. The TPLS dimensions significantly explained variance in psychosocial well-being of police officers including better self-esteem (R 2 = .11), more perceived police social support (R 2 = .30), and less romantic partner conflict (R 2 = .12). Future research could expand evaluation of TPLS psychometric characteristics such as confirmatory factor analysis with larger and more diverse sample, inter-rater reliability, and convergent validity with other non-police measures of transformative leadership.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreescu V, Vito GF (2010) An exploratory study on ideal leadership behavior: the opinions of American police officers. Int J Police Sci Manag 12:567–583
Arce C, Torrado J, Andrade E, Garrido J, de Francisco C (2008) Development of a scale to measure leadership capacity of players in sports teams. Psicológica 20(4):913
Arbuckle JL (2007) AMOS 16.0 user’s guide. Amos Development Corporation, Spring House
Avolio BJ, Bass BM, Jung DI (1999) Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. J Occup Organ Psychol 72:441–462
Avolio BJ, Bass BM (2004) Multifactor leadership questionnaire: third edition manual and sampler set. Mind Garden Inc., Menlo Park
Bass BM (1985) Leadership: good, better, best. Organ Dyn 13:26–40
Becker C, Glascoff M (2014) Process measures: a leadership tool for management. TQM J 26(1):50–62. doi:10.1108/TQM-02-2013-0018.
Burns JM (1978) Leadership. Harper and Row, New York
Can SH, Hendy HM (2014) Police stressors, negative outcomes associated with them, and coping mechanisms that may reduce them. Police J: Theory, Pract, Princ 87:167–177
Can SH, Hendy HM, Karagoz T (2015) Law enforcement officer stress survey-revised (LEOSS-R): four types of police stressors and negative psychosocial outcomes associated with them. Polic: J Policy Pract 9:340–351
Caulfield MB, Riggs DS (1992) The assessment of dating aggression: empirical evaluation of the conflict tactics scale. J Interpersonal Violence 7:549–558
Cunningham MR, Jonmes JW, Behrens GM (2011) Psychological assessment of chief of police candidates: scientific and practice issues. J Police Crim Psychol 26:77–86
Dean G, Gottschalk P (2013) Police leadership roles: empirical study of management attitudes. Int J Law Manag 55:304–317
Densten IL (2003) Senior police leadership: does rank matter? Polic: Int J Police Strateg Manag 26:400–418
Gamson WA, Sifry ML (2013) The occupy movement: an introduction. Sociol Q 54(2):159–163
Gershon RRM, Barocas B, Canton AN, Li X, Vlahov D (2009) Mental, physical, and behavioral outcomes associated with perceived work stress in police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior 36:275–289
Greenberg J (1990) Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J Manag 16:399–432
Hall GB, Dollard MF, Tuckey MR, Winefield AH, Thompson BM (2010) Job demands, work–family conflict, and emotional exhaustion in police officers: a longitudinal test of competing theories. J Occup Organ Psychol 83:237–250
Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55
Masal D (2015) Shared and transformational leadership in the police. Polic: Int J Police Strateg Manag 38(1):40–55. doi:10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2014-0081.
McNeeley S, Grothoff G (2015) A multilevel examination of the relationship between racial tension and attitudes toward the police. Am J Crim Justice:1–19. doi:10.1007/s12103-015-9318-2
Pearson-Goff M, Herrington V (2013) Police leadership: a systematic review of the literature. J Policy Pract 8:14–26
Procidano ME, Heller K (1983) Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies. Am J Community Psychol 11:1–24
Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Rupprecht EA, Waldrop JS, Grawitch MJ (2013) Initial validation of a new measure of leadership. Consult Psychol J: Pract Res 65(2):128–148. doi:10.1037/a0033127
Sarver MB, Miller H (2013) Police chief leadership: styles and effectiveness. Polic: Int J Police Strateg Manag 37:126–143
Schafer J (1996) Measuring spousal violence with the conflict tactics scale: notes on reliability and validity issues. J Interpers Violence 11:572–585
Stevens DJ (2008) Police officer stress: sources and solutions. Pearson/Prentice Hall Press, Upper Saddle River
White V, Robinson S (2014) Leading change in policing: police culture and the psychological contract. Police J: Theory, Pract Princ 87:258–269
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Can, S.H., Hendy, H.M. & Berkay Ege Can, M. A Pilot Study to Develop the Police Transformational Leadership Scale (PTLS) and Examine Its Associations with Psychosocial Well-Being of Officers. J Police Crim Psych 32, 105–113 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9204-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9204-y