Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colon Capsule Endoscopy – Shining the Light through the Colon

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a non-invasive, wireless capsule endoscope. In this article, we review its current applications, compare its performance with optical colonoscopy (OC) and alternative imaging modalities like CT colonography (CTC), and highlight developments that may increase potential future use.

Recent Findings

By comparison to OC both CCE and CTC have a good sensitivity and specificity in detecting colonic polyps. CCE is more sensitive in detecting sub centimetre polyps. CCE is capable of detecting colonic inflammation and anorectal pathologies, commonly missed by CTC. However, rates of complete CCE examinations are limited by inadequate bowel preparation or incomplete colonic transit, whereas CTC can be performed with less bowel purgatives. Patients tolerate CCE better than OC, however patient preference between CCE and CTC vary.

Summary

CCE and CTC are both reasonable alternatives to OC. Strategies to improve completion rates and adequacy of bowel preparation will improve cost and clinical effectiveness of CCE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spada C, Hassan C, Bellini D, et al. Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:2967–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07413-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ismail MS, Aoko O, Sihag S, et al. Lower gastrointestinal symptoms and symptoms-based triaging systems are poor predictors of clinical significant disease on colonoscopy. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020; 7:e000221. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000221.

  3. Asghar Z, Thoufeeq M, Kurien M, et al. Diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in patients with symptoms compatible with Rome IV functional bowel disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20:334-341.e333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mowat C, Digby J, Strachan JA, et al. Faecal haemoglobin and faecal calprotectin as indicators of bowel disease in patients presenting to primary care with bowel symptoms. Gut. 2016;65:1463–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rex DK. Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:353–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu R, Kassim T, Dave D, et al. Diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in young adults with lower gastrointestinal symptoms in a multicenter midwest Cohort. Dig Dis. 2020;38:484–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. 2014; 348:g2467. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2467.

  8. Shaukat A, Kahi CJ, Burke CA, et al. ACG clinical guidelines: colorectal cancer screening 2021. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:458–479. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122.

  9. Săftoiu A, Hassan C, Areia M, et al. Role of gastrointestinal endoscopy in the screening of digestive tract cancers in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) position statement. Endoscopy. 2020;52:293–304. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1104-5245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vuik FE, Nieuwenburg SA, Bardou M, et al. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults in Europe over the last 25 years. Gut. 2019;68:1820–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siegel RL, Jemal A. Percentage of colorectal cancer diagnosed in adults aged younger than 50 years. Cancer. 2016;122:1462–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Montminy EM, Zhou M, Maniscalco L, et al. Contributions of adenocarcinoma and carcinoid tumors to early-onset colorectal cancer incidence rates in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174:157–66. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-0068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325:1965–77. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Knudsen AB, Rutter CM, Peterse EFP, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: an updated modeling study for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2021;325:1998–2011. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.5746.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Spada C, Pasha SF, Gross SA, et al. Accuracy of first- and second-generation colon capsules in endoscopic detection of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:1533-1543.e1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.04.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Melson J, Trikudanathan G, Abu Dayyeh BK, et al. Video capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93:784–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rondonotti E, Borghi C, Mandelli G, et al. Accuracy of capsule colonoscopy and computed tomographic colonography in individuals with positive results from the fecal occult blood test. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1303–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.12.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pecere S, Senore C, Hassan C, et al. Accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy for advanced neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:406-414.e401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.09.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spada C, Hassan C, Galmiche JP, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2012;44:527–36. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1291717.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neri E, Halligan S, Hellström M, et al. The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:720–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bellini D, Panvini N, Vicini S, et al. Low-volume reduced bowel preparation regimen for CT colonography: a randomized noninferiority trial. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46:4556–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03176-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sali L, Mascalchi M, Falchini M, et al. Reduced and full-preparation CT colonography, fecal immunochemical test, and colonoscopy for population screening of colorectal cancer: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2016; 108. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv319.

  23. Kjølhede T, Ølholm AM, Kaalby L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for polyp detection: systematic review and meta-analyses. Endoscopy. 2021;53:713–21. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1249-3938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vuik FER, Nieuwenburg SAV, Moen S, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Endoscopy. 2021;53:815–24. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1308-1297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Möllers T, Schwab M, Gildein L, et al. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Endosc Int Open. 2021;9:E562–71. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1353-4849.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pickhardt PJ, Correale L, Delsanto S, et al. CT Colonography Performance for the Detection of Polyps and Cancer in Adults ≥ 65 Years Old: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:40–51. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.19515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection–systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011;259:393–405. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11101887.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005;237:893–904. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2373050176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. González-Suárez B, Pagés M, Araujo IK, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial-the VICOCA study. BMC Med. 2020;18:255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01717-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cash BD, Fleisher MR, Fern S, et al. Multicentre, prospective, randomised study comparing the diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in a screening population (the TOPAZ study). Gut. 2021;70:2115–22. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Utano K, Katsuki S, Matsuda T, et al. Colon Capsule Endoscopy versus CT Colonography in Patients with Large Non-Polypoid Tumours: A Multicentre Prospective Comparative Study (4CN Study). Digestion. 2020;101:615–23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, et al. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1661-1674.e1611. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;381:1194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62186-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. MacLeod C, Hudson J, Brogan M, et al. ScotCap - A large observational cohort study. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24:411–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ponugoti PL, Cummings OW, Rex DK. Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49:34–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vleugels JLA, Hazewinkel Y, Fockens P, et al. Natural history of diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a systematic literature review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1169-1176.e1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Deding U, Kaalby L, Bøggild H, et al. Colon Capsule Endoscopy vs. CT Colonography Following Incomplete Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113367.

  38. Spada C, Hassan C, Barbaro B, et al. Colon capsule versus CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy: a prospective, comparative trial. Gut. 2015;64:272–81. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rex DK, Adler SN, Aisenberg J, et al. Accuracy of capsule colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:948-957.e942. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. Radiology. 2004;232:784–90. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2323031614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Obaro AE, Plumb AA, Fanshawe TR, et al. Post-imaging colorectal cancer or interval cancer rates after CT colonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:326–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30032-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Burr NE, Derbyshire E, Taylor J, et al. Variation in post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer across colonoscopy providers in English National Health Service: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2019; 367:l6090. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6090.

  43. MacLeod C, Oliphant R, Docherty JG, et al. A colorectal cancer missed by colon capsule endoscopy: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22:258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02332-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Pasha SF, Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, et al. Capsule retention in Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020;26:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izz083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Na SY, Lim YJ. Capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: when? To whom? Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122240.

  46. Shi HY, Chan FKL, Higashimori A, et al. A prospective study on second-generation colon capsule endoscopy to detect mucosal lesions and disease activity in ulcerative colitis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:1139-1146.e1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Oliva S, Di Nardo G, Hassan C, et al. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy vs. colonoscopy in pediatric ulcerative colitis: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2014; 46:485–92. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1365413.

  48. Takano R, Osawa S, Uotani T et al. Evaluating mucosal healing using colon capsule endoscopy predicts outcome in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission. World J Clin Cases. 2018; 6:952–60. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.952.

  49. Bjoersum-Meyer T, Skonieczna-Zydecka K, Cortegoso Valdivia P, et al. Efficacy of bowel preparation regimens for colon capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2021;9:E1658–73. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1529-5814.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Deding U, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Koulaouzidis A, et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Preferences for Colon Capsule Endoscopy and Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091730.

  51. Ismail MS, Murphy G, Semenov S, et al. Comparing colon capsule endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02081-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Thygesen MK, Baatrup G, Petersen C, et al. Screening individuals’ experiences of colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy; a mixed methods study. Acta Oncol. 2019;58:S71–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1581372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ojidu H, Palmer H, Lewandowski J, et al. Patient tolerance and acceptance of different colonic imaging modalities: an observational cohort study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30:520–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000001090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Deding U, Kaalby L, Baatrup G, et al. The effect of prucalopride on the completion rate and polyp detection rate of colon capsule endoscopies. Clin Epidemiol. 2022;14:437–44. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S353527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Ding Z, Shi H, Zhang H, et al. Gastroenterologist-Level Identification of Small-Bowel Diseases and Normal Variants by Capsule Endoscopy Using a Deep-Learning Model. Gastroenterology. 2019;157:1044-1054.e1045. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Blanes-Vidal V, Baatrup G, Nadimi ES. Addressing priority challenges in the detection and assessment of colorectal polyps from capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening using machine learning. Acta Oncol. 2019;58:S29–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1584404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yamada A, Niikura R, Otani K, et al. Automatic detection of colorectal neoplasia in wireless colon capsule endoscopic images using a deep convolutional neural network. Endoscopy. 2021;53:832–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1266-1066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FWDT wrote the manuscript, MM and RS contributed to the editing and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Foong Way David Tai.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declared that there are no declarations of known conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tai, F.W.D., McAlindon, M. & Sidhu, R. Colon Capsule Endoscopy – Shining the Light through the Colon. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 25, 99–105 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00867-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00867-8

Keywords

Navigation