Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Device Therapy for Sudden Cardiac Death Prophylaxis After Acute Coronary Syndrome: When and Why?

  • Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes (H Jneid, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are a powerful tool in preventing sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias in ischemic cardiomyopathy. ICD indications and timing in acute coronary syndromes are unclear.

Purpose of Review

We reviewed several trials that delineated the indications for a cardiac defibrillator in patients with coronary artery disease.

Recent Findings

The role of cardiac defibrillators in secondary prevention has been well established by AVID, CIDS, and CASH trials. AVID showed reduction in both all-cause mortality and arrhythmic death while the two smaller trials showed only improvement in arrhythmic death. Similarly, trials like MADIT, CABG Patch, MUSTT, MADIT-II, DINAMIT, and the IRIS trial have fine-tuned the indications for ICD in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Benefits of an ICD were most pronounced in those with reduced ejection fraction and 40 days or more since myocardial infarction or in those who were not immediately post revascularization. The recent VEST trial aimed to study wearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCDs) in patients who did not have an indication for an implantable defibrillator. The arrhythmic deaths (1.6% vs. 2.4%) were not reduced by the WCD.

Summary

Based on consistent reduction in arrhythmic death in all primary and secondary prevention trials, defibrillators are effective in carefully selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:•• Of major importance

  1. Zipes DP, Wellens HJ. Sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1998;98(21):2334–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. ACC/AHA/HRS. 2006 key data elements and definitions for electrophysiological studies and procedures. Circulation. 2006;114(23):2534–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67–e492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chelly J, Mongardon N, Dumas F, Varenne O, Spaulding C, Vignaux O, et al. Benefit of an early and systematic imaging procedure after cardiac arrest: insights from the PROCAT (Parisian Region Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest) registry. Resuscitation. 2012;83(12):1444–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhar-Amato J, Davies W, Agarwal S. Ventricular arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction: ‘The Perfect Storm’. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev. 2017;6(3):134–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, Peters RW, Obias-Manno D, Barker AH, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(12):781–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuck KH, Schaumann A, Eckardt L, Willems S, Ventura R, Delacretaz E, et al. Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9708):31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, Stevenson WG, Blier L, Sarrazin JF, et al. Ventricular tachycardia ablation versus escalation of antiarrhythmic drugs. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):111–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 2018;138(13):e272–391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators I. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(22):1576–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. •• Causes of death in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(5):1552–9. Landmark article showing evidence to use implantable defibrillators for sudden cardiac death.

  12. •• Connolly SJ, Gent M, Roberts RS, Dorian P, Roy D, Sheldon RS, et al. Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone. Circulation. 2000;101(11):1297–302. Landmark article showing evidence to use implantable defibrillators for sudden cardiac death.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuck KH, Cappato R, Siebels J, Ruppel R. Randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest: the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH). Circulation. 2000;102(7):748–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Connolly SJ, Hallstrom AP, Cappato R, Schron EB, Kuck KH, Zipes DP, et al. Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg . Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(24):2071–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Klein H, et al. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(26):1933–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(12):877–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greenberg H, Case RB, Moss AJ, Brown MW, Carroll ER, Andrews ML, et al. Analysis of mortality events in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT-II). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(8):1459–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, Josephson ME, Prystowsky EN, Hafley G. A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(25):1882–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schrage B, Uijl A, Benson L, Westermann D, Stahlberg M, Stolfo D, et al. Association between use of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and mortality in patients with heart failure: a prospective propensity-score matched analysis from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Circulation. 2019.

  20. Bauer A, Klemm M, Rizas KD, Hamm W, von Stulpnagel L, Dommasch M, et al. Prediction of mortality benefit based on periodic repolarisation dynamics in patients undergoing prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator: a prospective, controlled, multicentre cohort study. Lancet. 2019.

  21. Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Hampton JR, Hatala R, et al. Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(24):2481–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Steinbeck G, Andresen D, Seidl K, Brachmann J, Hoffmann E, Wojciechowski D, et al. Defibrillator implantation early after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(15):1427–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bigger JT Jr. Prophylactic use of implanted cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary-artery bypass graft surgery. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Patch Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(22):1569–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bigger JT Jr, Whang W, Rottman JN, Kleiger RE, Gottlieb CD, Namerow PB, et al. Mechanisms of death in the CABG Patch trial: a randomized trial of implantable cardiac defibrillator prophylaxis in patients at high risk of death after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 1999;99(11):1416–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haanschoten, D. (2019). Long-term outcome of the Defibrillator After Primary Angioplasty (DAPA) trial. European Society of Cardiology Congress, Paris, France.

  26. •• Olgin JE, Pletcher MJ, Vittinghoff E, Wranicz J, Malik R, Morin DP, et al. Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(13):1205–15. This article shows new evidence on wearable cardiac-defibrillator for prevention of sudden cardiac death, which may impact the current guideline and its use.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kutyifa V, Moss AJ, Klein H, Biton Y, McNitt S, MacKecknie B, et al. Use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in high-risk cardiac patients: data from the Prospective Registry of Patients Using the Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator (WEARIT-II Registry). Circulation. 2015;132(17):1613–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Patel KH, Lambiase PD. The subcutaneous ICD-current evidence and challenges. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014;4(6):449–59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chieng D, Paul V, Denman R. Current device therapies for sudden cardiac death prevention - the ICD, subcutaneous ICD and wearable ICD. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(1):65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Burke MC, Gold MR, Knight BP, Barr CS, Theuns D, Boersma LVA, et al. Safety and efficacy of the totally subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: 2-year results from a pooled analysis of the IDE Study and EFFORTLESS Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(16):1605–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Debakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Faheemullah Beg

  2. Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Debakey Heart & Vascular Center, 6550 Fannin Street, Suite 1901, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Miguel Valderrabano & Paul Schurmann

Authors
  1. Faheemullah Beg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel Valderrabano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Schurmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Schurmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Faheemullah Beg, Miguel Valderrabano, and Paul Schurmann declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beg, F., Valderrabano, M. & Schurmann, P. Device Therapy for Sudden Cardiac Death Prophylaxis After Acute Coronary Syndrome: When and Why?. Curr Cardiol Rep 22, 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-1255-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-1255-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation