Abstract
Background
Complex pelvic fractures present the orthopaedic surgeon with many challenges. 3-D printed models may provide assistance in pre-operative planning, may lead to improvements in intra-operative (i) decision making and (ii) efficiencies (time reduction, blood loss reduction, screening reduction) and may result in improvements in post-operative outcomes (fracture reduction & quality of life). The models also provide hands-on opportunities for orthopaedic trainees and patients. This may result in improvements in (i) education/training regarding the management of pelvic and acetabular fractures for orthopaedic trainees and (ii) improvements in patient consenting and overall patient satisfaction.
Design
Single-centre, two orthopaedic surgeons (pelvic and acetabular fellowship trained), prospective observational study. Twenty patients with acute displaced pelvic/acetabular fracture(s); ten 3-D–printed pelvis and ten non-printed cases for comparison. The comparison cohorts were matched for fracture classification, sex and age.
Outcome measures
Classification assistance, intra-operative time, estimated blood loss, screening amount, post-operative reduction and infection, EQ-5D-5L, teaching/educational assistance and pre-operative counselling.
Results
The models provided more information regarding fracture pattern, however, this did not result in change of CT-planned approach/procedure or patient outcomes. The models scored highly on surgeon’s questionnaire. The models were found to have a positive impact on trainee education and patient consenting/counselling. With regard to objective comparisons, there was no significant improvements in time-to-surgery, intra-operative time, estimated blood loss, screening amount, fracture reduction or infection rate. There was no significant difference in quality of life questionnaire ~ 12 months post-surgery (statistical tests used; Cohen’s effect size and Fisher’s exact test).
Conclusions
Whilst the authors recognize the positive subjective findings with respect to the use of 3-D printing in pelvic and acetabular trauma in our National Centre, objective findings were lacking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alton TB, Gee AO (2014) Classifications in brief: Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(1):35–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3375-y
Lack WD, Crist BD, Seymour RB, Harvin W, Karunakar MA, TXA Study Group II (2017) Effect of tranexamic acid on transfusion: a randomized clinical trial in acetabular fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma 31(10):526–530. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.00000000000968
Model of care for elective surgery. National Clinical Programme in Surgery (2011). Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
Gowda SR, Mitchell CJ, Abouel-Enin S, Lewis C (2018) Radiation risk amongst orthopaedic surgeons – do we know the risk? J Perioper Pract 29:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750458918785268
Huang Z, Song W, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Zhou D, Zhou X, He Y (2018) Three-dimensional printing model improves morphological understanding in acetabular fracture learning: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. PLoS One 13(1):e0191328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191328
Luxford K, Sutton S (2014) How does patient experience fit into the overall healthcare picture? Patient Exp J 1(1):20–27
Auricchio F, Marconi S (2016) 3D printing: clinical applications in orthopaedics and traumatology. Efort Open Rev 1(5):121–127
Ventola CL (2014) Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projection uses. Pharm & Therap 39(10):704–711
Mulford JS, Babazadeh S, Mackay N (2016) Three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgery: review of current and future applications. ANZ J Surg 86(9):648–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13533
Tetsworth K, Block S, Glatt V (2017) Putting 3D modelling and 3D printing into practice: virtual surgery and preoperative planning to reconstruct complex post-traumatic skeletal deformities and defects. SICOT J 3:16. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016043
Mostofi S (2005) Who’s who in orthopaedics, 1st edn. Springer, London, UK
Lal H, Patralekh MK (2018) 3D printing and its applications in orthopaedic trauma: a technological marvel. J Clin Orthop Trauma 9(3):260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.07.022
Alton TB, Gee AO (2014) Classifications in brief: young and burgess classification of pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(8):2338–2342
Hüfner T, Pohlemann T, Gansslen A, Assassi P, Prokop M, Tscherne H (1999) [The value of CT in classification and decision making in acetabulum fractures. A systematic analysis] [in German]. Unfallchirurg 102:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050383
Galvez M, Asahi T, Baar A, Carcuro G, Cuchacovich N, Fuentes JA, Chahin A (2018) Use of three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgical planning. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2(5):e071. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00071
Yang H, Lei Q, Cai L, Liu F, Zhou W, Chen S, Chen L, Liu T, Jiang M, Wang K, Xiao S, Liu W (2018) Treatment of unstable pelvic fractures by cannulated screw internal fixation with the assistance of three-dimensional printing insertion template. Chin J Rep and Constr Surg 32(2):145–151. https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.201708059
Kim JW, Lee Y, Seo J, Park JH, Seo YM, Kim SS, Shon HC (2018) Clinical experience with three-dimensional printing techniques in orthopedic trauma. J Orthop Sci 23(2):383–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2017.12.010
Liu X, Zeng CJ, Lu JS, Lin XC, Juang HJ, Tan XY, Cai DZ (2017) Application of 3D printing and computer-assisted surgical simulation in preoperative planning for acetabular fracture. J of South Med Univ 37(3):378–38228377356
Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L (2016) 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online 15(1):115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
Zeng C, Xing W, Wu Z, Huang H, Huang W (2016) A combination of three-dimensional printing and computer-assisted virtual surgical procedure for preoperative planning of acetabular fracture reduction. Injury. 47(10):2223–2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.015
Iqbal F, Younus S, Asmatullah, Zia OB, Khan N (2017) Surgical site infection following fixation of acetabular fractures. Hip Pelvis 29(3):176–181. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.3.176
Kumar P, Sen RK, Kumar V, Dadra A (2016) Quality of life following total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular fractures, previously managed by open reduction and internal fixation. Chin J Traumatol 19(4):206–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.07.012
Piazzolla A, Baglioni M, Solarino G, Vicenti G, Panella A, Moretti B (2018) Acetabular fractures: is it possible to regain the same patient's related quality of life before trauma? Injury. 49(Suppl 3):S74–S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.004
Wu AM, Wang K, Wang JS, Chen CH, Yang XD, Ni WF, Hu YZ (2018) The addition of 3D printed models to enhance the teaching and learning of bone spatial anatomy and fractures for undergraduate students: a randomized controlled study. Ann Transl Med 6(20):403. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.09.59
Manganaro MS, Morag Y, Weadock WJ, Yablon CM, Gaetke-Udager K, Stein EB (2017) Creating three-dimensional printed models of acetabular fractures for use as educational tools. Radiographics. 37(3):871–880. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160129
Bizzotto N, Tami I, Santucci A, Adani R, Poggi P, Romani D, Carpeggiani G, Ferraro F, Festa S, Magnan B (2015) 3D printed replica of articular fractures for surgical planning and patient consent: a two years multi-centric experience. 3D Print Med 2(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-016-0006-8
Liew Y, Beveridge E, Demetriades AK, Hughes MA (2015) 3D printing of patient-specific anatomy: a tool to improve patient consent and enhance imaging interpretation by trainees. Br J Neurosurg 29(5):712–714. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2015.1026799
Marone EM, Rinaldi LF, Pietrabissa A, Argenteri A (2018) Effectiveness of 3D printed models in obtaining informed consent to complex aortic surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 59(3):488–489. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.17.10293-4
Yoon SH, Park S, Kang CH, Park IK, Goo JM, Kim YT (2018) Personalized 3D-printed model for informed consent for stage I lung cancer: a randomized pilot trial. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg S1043–0679(18):30324–30321. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.10.017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Disclosures
None.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Downey, C., McCarrick, C., Fenelon, C. et al. A novel approach using 3-D printing in the Irish National Centre for pelvic and acetabular surgery. Ir J Med Sci 189, 219–228 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02055-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02055-y