Abstract
Background
Centralisation of rectal cancer surgery has altered the delivery of colorectal cancer care in Ireland. This has resulted in an increased demand for elective surgical beds in designated centres.
Aim
This study aimed to assess if day of surgery admission (DOSA), in conjunction with implementation of a coordinated enhanced recovery pathway can reduce length of stay following elective rectal cancer resection.
Methods
This is a retrospective review from a single institution. Our prospectively maintained Dendrite® Database was interrogated. Three time points were analysed across a 7-year period (2011, 2012, 2016). The first predates the introduction of a dedicated DOSA programme, the next was directly thereafter, and the final was 5-years post-implementation. These dates coincide with the centralisation of rectal cancer surgery to this centre. Outcomes included unadjusted length of stay and rates of DOSA pre-and post-implementation of the programme.
Results
The introduction of a DOSA pathway resulted in a fivefold increase in day of surgery admissions and a related 3-day reduction in average length of stay within a single year of implementation. This further improved in 2016, showing an almost 83% increase (15.90–98.50%) in day of surgery admission and a reduction in average length of stay from 16.4 to 12.4 days when compared to 2011.
Conclusions
Despite an increase in caseload of 54%, an estimated 272 bed days were saved. This demonstrated that DOSA is sustainable and highly effective in tackling the increased inpatient bed demands associated with the growing requirement for elective surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Department of Health and Children (2006) A strategy for cancer control in Ireland. National Cancer Forum
Burke JP, Coffey JC, Boyle E, Keane F, McNamara DA (2013) Early outcomes for rectal cancer surgery in the republic of Ireland following a national centralization program. Ann Surg Oncol 20(11):3414–3421
Boyle E, Timmons A, Al-Akash M, Kennedy AM, O'Grady H, Hill AD et al (2011) The management of rectal cancer in Ireland in 2007--room for improvement? Surgeon 9(4):179–186
Comber H, Sharp L, Timmons A, Keane FB (2012) Quality of rectal cancer surgery and its relationship to surgeon and hospital caseload: a population-based study. Color Dis 14(10):e692–e700
National Cancer Control Programme (2014) Report on the implementation of “a strategy for cancer control in Ireland 2006”. Health Service Executive
Bao H, Yang F, Su S, Wang X, Zhang M, Xiao Y, Jiang H, Wang J, Liu M (2016) Evaluating the effect of clinical care pathways on quality of cancer care: analysis of breast, colon and rectal cancer pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142(5):1079–1089
Sun SX, Leung AN, Dillon PW, Hollenbeak CS (2015) Length of stay and readmissions in mastectomy patients. Breast J 21(5):526–532
Spanjersberg W, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven C (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Art. No.: CD007635
Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, de Jong PJ, van Goor H, Bremers AJ (2011) Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional perioperative care in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54(7):833–839
Stephens I, Stuart C, Stephens R, McCormick P, Larkin J, Mehigan B (2017) Trends in surgical mortality following colorectal resection between 2002 and 2012: a single-centre, retrospective analysis. Ir Med J 110(6):578
Department of Health (2017) National cancer strategy 2017-2026. National cancer control programme
Uña E, López-Lara F (2010) Pilot study of a clinical pathway implementation in rectal cancer. Clin Med Insights Oncol 4:111–115
Rothwell LA, Bokey EL, Keshava A, Chapuis PH, Dent OF (2006) Outcomes after admission on the day of elective resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 76(1–2):14–19
Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94(2):224–231
Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Ljungqvist O et al (2009) Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 96(2):197–205
Gash KJ, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2012) Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic colorectal resection with primary anastomosis: accelerated discharge is safe and does not give rise to increased readmission rates. Color Dis 14(10):1287–1290
Byrne BE, Branagan G, Chave HS (2013) Unselected rectal cancer patients undergoing low anterior resection with defunctioning ileostomy can be safely managed within an Enhanced Recovery Programme. Tech Coloproctol 17(1):73–78
Hardt J, Schwarzbach M, Hasenberg T, Post S, Kienle P, Ronellenfitsch U (2013) The effect of a clinical pathway for enhanced recovery of rectal resections on perioperative quality of care. Int J Color Dis 28(7):1019–1026
Sehgal R, Hill A, Deasy J, McNamara DA, Cahill RA (2012) Fast-track for the modern colorectal department. World J Surg 36(10):2473–2480
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study concept and design: D.A. McNamara
Study materials: I. Stephens
Data collection: I. Stephens and C. Murphy
Data analysis: I. Stephens and I.S Reynolds
Manuscript preparation: All authors
Manuscript review: All authors
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stephens, I., Murphy, C., Reynolds, I.S. et al. Implementation of day of surgery admission for rectal cancer surgery in Ireland following a national centralisation programme. Ir J Med Sci 188, 765–769 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1904-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1904-0