Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

‘All by myself’: interns’ reports of their experiences taking consent in Irish hospitals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Obtaining patient consent is a fundamental process in surgical practice and is integral in respecting and safeguarding patient autonomy. It has been reported that the task of consenting patients frequently lies with junior doctors, who have the least experience of the procedure.

Aim

To examine the role of interns in the consent process in the Irish context as well as to identify their concerns.

Methods

A 12-point questionnaire, assessing interns’ experience with surgical consent, was circulated to interns in three Irish university teaching hospitals based in different geographical locations. Interns who had never worked in a surgical team were excluded from the analysis.

Results

Out of 104 interns, 60 interns returned questionnaires. Of these, 58 (96.7%) had consented a patient for a surgical procedure. Forty-four interns (73.3%) had never been supervised by a senior doctor. Of the 58 interns who had obtained surgical consent, six interns (10.3%) reported knowledge of ‘all’ the steps of the procedure. Only five interns (8.6%) reported that they were aware of all the risks of the procedures and 34 interns (58.6%) reported they knew ‘most’ of the risks. Twenty-five interns (43%) reported that they had, at some point, been explained the risks of the procedures by a senior colleague.

Conclusion

The majority of interns reported that they had taken consent for a procedure without full knowledge of the procedure and its complications. Supervision or instruction from a senior colleague was reported by a minority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Health Service Executive. National consent policy. 2014. Available at http://www.hse.ie/eng/about/Who/qualityandpatientsafety/National_Consent_Policy/National Consent PolicyMay14.pdf.[ Accessed on 17/3/17]

  2. Irish Medical Council. Guide to profession conduct and behaviour to for registered medical practitioners. 2009. Available at https://http://www.medicalcouncil.ie/News-and-Publications/Publications/Professional-Conduct-Ethics/Guide-to-Professional-Conduct-and-Behaviour-for-Registered-Medical-Practitioners-pdf.pdf.[Accessed on 02/01/17]

  3. Houghton DJ, Williams S, Bennett JD et al (1997) Informed consent: patients’ and junior doctors’ perceptions of the consent procedure. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 22(6):515–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McDonald SE, Chadha NK, Mills RS (2008) Changing practices in the consent process for nose and throat procedures: a three-year study. J Laryngol Otol 122(10):1105–1108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schildmann J, Cushing A, Doyal L, Vollmann J (2005) Informed consent in clinical practice: pre-registration house officers’ knowledge, difficulties and the need for postgraduate training. Med Teach 27(7):649–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soin B, Smellie W, Thomson H (1993) Informed consent: a case for more education of the surgical team. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75(1):62–65

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Angelos P, DaRosa D, Bentram D (2002) Residents seeking informed consent: are they adequately knowledgeable? Curr Surg 59(1):115–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chadha NK, Pratap R, Narula AA (2003) Consent processes in common nose and throat procedures. J Laryngol Otol 117(7):536–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cawich SO, Barnett AT, Crandon IW, Drew SD, Gordon-Strachan G (2013) From the patient’s perspective: is there a need to improve the quality of informed consent for surgery in training hospitals? Perm J 17(4):22–26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmad R, Shobaki S, Etezadi V, Raju S, Case R (2009) Adequacy of consent in patients with distal radius fractures. Int Orthop 33(5):1311–1313

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rahman L, Clamp J, Hutchinson J (2011) Is consent for hip fracture surgery for older people adequate? The case for pre-printed consent forms. J Med Ethics 37(3):187–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Probert N, Malik A, Lovell M (2007) Surgery for fractured neck of femur—are patients adequately consented? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(1):66–69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Huntley JS, Anakwe R, Findlay I (2004) Informed consent and the JHO in Scotland. Int J Clin Pract 58(6):550–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wood F, Martin SM, Carson-Stevens A, Elwyn G, Precious E, Kinnersley P (2016) Doctors’ perspectives of informed consent for non-emergency surgical procedures: a qualitative interview study. Health Expect 19(3):751–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson OA, Wearne IM (2007) Informed consent for elective surgery—what is best practice? J R Soc Med 100(2):97–100

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards TJ, Finlay I, Wilkins DC, Lambert AW (2004) Improving risk disclosure during the consent process. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86(6):458–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. McGaughey I (2004) Informed consent and knee arthroscopies: an evaluation of patient understanding and satisfaction. Knee 11(3):237–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cowan J (2000) Consent and clinical governance: improving standards and skills. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 8(2):124–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chadha NK, Repanos C (2004) How much do healthcare professionals know about informed consent? A Bristol experience. Surgeon 2(6):328–333 60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kheiran A, Banerjee P, Stott P (2014) Consenting operative orthopaedic trauma patients: challenges and solutions. ISRN Surg 2014:354239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland

    Roisin M. Heaney & Eva M. Doherty

  2. Depatment of Surgery, Mayo University Hospital, Castlebar, Co. Mayo, Ireland

    Michael Murray

  3. School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

    Aine M. Heaney

Authors
  1. Roisin M. Heaney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aine M. Heaney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eva M. Doherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roisin M. Heaney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heaney, R.M., Murray, M., Heaney, A.M. et al. ‘All by myself’: interns’ reports of their experiences taking consent in Irish hospitals. Ir J Med Sci 188, 259–263 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1782-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1782-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation