Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of contemporary multidisciplinary meetings on workload at a tertiary level hospital

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In recent years, multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) have become the standard of patient care in oncologic and other speciality care pathways. The number, complexity, and diverse source of imaging studies presented continue to expand rapidly. True multidisciplinary input requires parallel support from other colleagues and diagnostic services. It is now recognised that this is the appropriate forum for key decision making and education in care algorithms, though service plans make little or no accommodation of their expanding role in addition to existing services.

Aims

We tried to objectively quantify one element of this burgeoning service.

Methods

Data were retrospectively gathered over a 6 month period, and a 5 week prospective study was then performed to examine the workload in further detail.

Results

Retrospectively, 199 meetings were held with 2253 clinical cases reviewed over 26 weeks. Prospectively, 52 meetings were held over 5 weeks for 13 clinical specialty areas. There were 1038 clinical case discussions. There were a total of 2122 documented individual imaging studies reviewed. Specialist registrar preparation time was 55 h (11 per week). Consultant preparation time was 67.75 h (13.55 per week). Delivery time was 57.25 h (11.45 per week).

Conclusion

The complexity and range of cases at MDMs continue to expand, serving local and national needs, though service plans do not acknowledge their role in the working day. Our study shows just one element that clearly signals a need to take account of the new methods of delivering modern healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kane B, Luz S, O’Briain DS, McDermott R (2007) Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on workflow in radiology and pathology departments. BMC Med 5:15. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-5-15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L (2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol 7(11):935–943. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70940-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Croke JM, El-Sayed S (2012) Multidisciplinary management of cancer patients: chasing a shadow or real value? An overview of the literature. Curr Oncol 19(4):e232–e238. doi:10.3747/co.19.944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Perri F, Muto P, Aversa C, Daponte A, Della Vittoria G, Pepe S, Caponigro F (2013) Integrated therapeutic approaches in head and neck cancer: the importance of multidisciplinary team management. Anti-Cancer Agents Med Chem 13(6):834–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kee F, Owen T, Leathem R (2004) Decision making in a multidisciplinary cancer team: does team discussion result in better quality decisions? Med Decis Mak: Int J Soc Med Decis Mak 24(6):602–613. doi:10.1177/0272989X04271047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blazeby JM, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, English R, Donovan JL (2006) Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol: Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol/ESMO 17(3):457–460. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdj102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta T (2007) Multidisciplinary clinics in oncology: the hidden pitfalls. J Oncol Pract 3(2):72–73. doi:10.1200/JOP.0722505

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brady AP (2011) Measuring consultant radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey. Insights Imaging 2(3):247–260. doi:10.1007/s13244-011-0094-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan SH, Hedges WP (2013) Workload of consultant radiologists in a large DGH and how it compares to international benchmarks. Clin Radiol 68(5):e239–e244. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2012.10.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Aherne.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aherne, E., Moriarty, H., Egan, M. et al. The impact of contemporary multidisciplinary meetings on workload at a tertiary level hospital. Ir J Med Sci 186, 359–362 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-016-1479-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-016-1479-6

Keywords

Navigation