Abstract
This study examines the role of managers’ personal characteristics, namely, proactiveness, perceptions about work discretion, and social networking ability on the social, environmental, and financial performance of community forest enterprises (CFEs). Data obtained through a mail survey of CFEs located in the province of British Columbia, Canada, shows that CFEs’ social performance is associated with their managers’ perceptions about work discretion and managers’ social networking abilities. The environmental performance is associated with managers’ perceptions about work discretion. However, the financial performance is not associated with any of these personal characteristics. These findings have three critical implications. First, CFEs which seek to improve social performance must emphasize—at the time of hiring and through training programs—social networking abilities of managers. Second, those CFEs which seek to improve environmental performance should emphasize sense of self-empowerment among managers in making organizational decisions. That is, the more CFE managers think that they have discretion over organizational decisions, the more they can deliver on the environmental front. Third, CFEs seeking to improve financial performance should look beyond personal characteristics and hire specialized finance professionals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambrose B, Lawrence A, Stewart A (2015) Community Based forest enterprises in Britain: two organising typologies. For Policy Econ 58:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.11.005
Ambus L (2016) Communtiy forestry in British Columbia: from a movement to an institution. (Ed.), Community Forestry in Canada: Lessons from Policy and Practice. UBC Press, pp 155–178. Sara Teitelbaum
Antia KD, Frazier GL (2001) The severity of contract enforcement in interfirm channel relationships. J Mark 65(4):67–81. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.4.67.18385
Antinori C, Bray DB (2005) Community forest enterprises as entrepreneurial firms: economic and institutional perspectives from Mexico. World Dev 33(9 SPEC. ISS.):1529–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.011
Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14(3):396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
Arnold HJ, Feldman DC (1981) Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations. Acad Manag J 24(2):377–385. https://doi.org/10.5465/255848
Bateman TS, Crant JM (1993) The proactive component of organizational behavior: a measure and correlates. J Organ Behav 14(2):103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213415
BC Government (2022) CFA status report: issued and invited community forests. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/forestry/forest-tenures/timber-harvesting-rights/community-forest-agreements, last accessed May 26th 2022
BCCFA (2020) BC community forest indicators report. https://bccfa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/BCCFA-Indicators-2020-final.pdf. Last accessed 26th May 2022
BCCFA Homepage (2017) British Columbia Community Forest Association. https://bccfa.ca/. last accessed 26th May 2022
Benner J, Lertzman K, Pinkerton E (2014) Social contracts and community forestry: how can we design forest policies and tenure arrangements to generate local benefits? Can J For Res 44(8):903–913. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0405
Bornstein D (2007) How to change the world: social entrepreneurs and the power of New Ideas, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Boyd BK, Gove S(2006) Managerial constraint: the intersection between organizational task environment and discretion. In: Research methodology in strategy and management, vol 3. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 57–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-8387(06)03005-0
Bromiley P, Rau D (2015) Social, behavioral, and cognitive influences on upper echelons during strategy process: a literature review. J Manag 42(1):174–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617240
Bullock R, Broad G, Palmer L, Smith MA (2017) Characterising institutional diversity in Canada’s community forests. In: Bullock R, Broad G, Palmer L, Smith P (eds) Growing community forestry. Practice, research and advocacy in Canada. University of Manitoba Press, pp 1–26
Bullock R, Hanna KS (2012) Community forestry. Local Values, conflict and forest governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Carías Vega D (2019) Community-based forestry and community forestry enterprises in quintana roo, mexico and petén, guatemala: how have policies, history, and culture shaped their trajectories? J Sustain For 38(7):651–669
Carias-Vega D, Keenan RJ (2016) Agents or stewards in community forestry enterprises? Lessons from the Mayan Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Land Use Policy 52:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.016
Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG 1 (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J Manag 30(6):749–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JM.2004.06.001
Carpenter MA, Golden BR (1997) Perceived managerial discretion: a study of cause and effect. Strateg Manag J 18(3):187–206
Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857200600101
Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Pearson AW, Barnett T (2012) Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrep Theory Pract 36(2):267–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00407.x
Coombes SMT, Morris MH, Allen JA, Webb JW (2011) Behavioural orientations of non-profit boards as a factor in entrepreneurial performance: does governance matter? J Manag Stud 48(4):829–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00956.x
Cubbage FW, Davis RR, Paredes R, Mollenhauer D, Kraus Elsin R, Frey Y, González Hernández GE, Albarrán IA, Hurtado H, Cruz AMS, Salas DNC (2015) Community forestry enterprises in Mexico: sustainability and competitiveness. J Sustain For 34(6–7):623–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2015.1040514
Dacin MT, Dacin PA, Tracey P (2011) Social entrepreneurship: a critique and future directions. Organ Sci 22(5):1203–1213
Devisscher T, Spies J, Griess V (2021) Time for change: learning from community forests to enhance the resilience of multi-value forestry in British Columbia, Canada. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105317
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 4th edn. Wiley Blackwell, New York
Doherty B, Haugh HM, Lyon F (2014) Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: a review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 16(4):417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
Egunyu F, Reed MG, Sinclair JA (2016) Learning through new approaches to forest governance: evidence from harrop-procter community forest, Canada. Environ Manag 57:784–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0652-4
Engbring G, Hajjar R (2021) Mexican community forest enterprises as social firms: organizational differences and the factors that shape them. For Policy Econ 131:102557
FAO (2016) Forty years of community-based forestry: a review of its extent and effectiveness. Forestry Paper (FAO) eng no. 176
Fernandez-Perez V (2012) The effects of CEOs’ social networks on organizational performance through knowledge and strategic flexibility. Personnel Rev 41(6):777–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330910960799
Furness E, Harshaw H, Nelson H (2015) Community Forestry in British Columbia: policy progression and public participation. For Policy Econ 58:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.12.005
Furness E, Nelson H (2012) Community forest organizations and adaptation to climate change in British Columbia. For Chron 88(05):519–524. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2012-099
Gagnon MA, Michael JH, Elser N, Gyory C (2013) Seeing green in several ways: The interplay of entrepreneurial, sustainable and market orientations on executive scanning and small business performance. J Mark Dev Compet 7(3):9–28
Geletkanycz MA, Hambrick DC (1997) The external ties of top executives: implications for strategic choice and performance. Adm Sci Q 42(4):654–681
Gibb A, Scott M (1985) Strategic awareness, personal commitment and the process of planning in the small business. J Manag Stud 22(6):597–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1985.tb00014.x
Hair JF (2009) Multivariate data analysis
Hajjar R, Oldekop JA (2018) Research frontiers in community forest management. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 32:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.06.003
Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: an update. Acad Manag Rev 32(2):334–343
Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper Echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev 9(2):193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1984.4277628
Hay J (1990) Managerial Competences or managerial characteristics? Manag Educ Dev 21(4):305–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050769002100404
Hinton P, Brownlow C, McMurray I, Cozens B (2004) SPSS explained. Routledge, London
Hornsby JS, Kuratko DF, Shaker, Zahra A (2002) Middle managers’ perception ofthe internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. J Bus Ventur 17:253–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00059-8
Humphries S, Holmes TP, Kainer K, Koury CGG, Cruz E, de Miranda Rocha R (2012) Are community-based forest enterprises in the tropics financially viable? Case studies from the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol Econ 77:62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.018
Kickul J, Gundry L (2002) Prospecting for strategic advantage: the proactive entrepreneurial personality and small firm innovation. J Small Bus Manag 40(2):85–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-627X.00042
Kozak R (2009) Alternative business models for forest dependent communities in Africa: a pragmatic consideration of small-scale-enterprise and a path forward. Madag Conserv Develop 4(2):76–81
Lefebvre LA (1992) Firm innovativeness and CEO characteristics. J Eng Technol Manag 9:243–271
Ludvig A, Wilding M, Thorogood A, Weiss G (2018) Social innovation in the welsh woodlands: community based forestry as collective third-sector engagement. For Policy Econ 95:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.004
MacMahon J, Murphy E (1999) Managerial effectiveness in small enterprises: implications for HRD. J Eur Ind Train 23(1):25–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599910253519
Macqueen D (2013) Enabling conditions for successful community forest enterprises. Small Scale For 12(1):145–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9193-8
March JG, Simon H (1958) Organizations. Wiley
Markman GD, Russo M, Lumpkin GT, Jennings PD, Mair J (2016) Entrepreneurship as a platform for pursuing multiple goals: a special issue on sustainability, ethics, and entrepreneurship. J Manag Stud 53(5):673–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12214
Miles MP, Verreynne ML, Luke B (2014) Social enterprises and the performance advantages of a vincentian marketing orientation. J Bus Ethics 123(4):549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2009-3
Molnar A, Liddle M, Bracer C, Khare A, White A, Bull J, Aldridge CH, Angu KA, Antinori C, Branney P, Fonseca A, Baput B, Benneker C, Blomley T, Camara K, Gatto F, Kozak R, Orozco CG, Martin A, Wilshusen P (2007) Community-based forest enterprises in tropical forest countries: status and potential, vol. 2007, Issue July
Montgomery aW, Dacin PT, Dacin MT (2012) Collective social entrepreneurship: collaboratively shaping social good. J Bus Ethics 111(3):375–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1501-5
Mulkey S, Kenneth D (2012) The community forestry guidebook II: effective governance and forest management. FORREX forum for research and extension in natural resources, 2nd edn, Forrex Series No. 30, pp 151
Muñoz S-A, Steiner A, Farmer J (2015) Processes of community-led social enterprise development: learning from the rural context. Commun Dev J 50(3):478–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsu055
Norman G (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ 15(5):625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
Nybakk E, Crespell P, Hansen E, Lunnan A (2009) Antecedents to forest owner innovativeness: an investigation of the non-timber forest products and services sector. For Ecol Manag 257(2):608–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.040
Pinkerton E, Rutherford M (2021) Evaluating British Columbia’s Municipally Owned Community Forest Corporations as Governance Structures. Environ Manage 67(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01384-4
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Roxas B, Coetzer A (2012) Institutional environment, managerial attitudes and environmental sustainability orientation of small firms. J Bus Ethics 111(4):461–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1211-z
Ruseva TB, Evans TP, Fischer BC (2014) Variations in the social networks of forest owners: the effect of management activity, resource professionals, and ownership size. Small-Scale Forestry 13(3):377–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9260-z
Sanchez-Badini O, Hajjar R, Kozak R (2018) Critical success factors for small and medium forest enterprises: a review. For Policy Econ 94:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2018.06.005
Searle BJ, Rooney J (2013) Proactivity at work: a path to organizational sustainability. In: Avery GC, Hughes B (eds) Fresh thoughts in sustainable leadership. Melbourne: Tilde University Press (TUP), pp 84–96
Siegner M, Kozak R, Panwar R, Nelson HW (2022) How does strategic choice affect the performance of community forest enterprises? A study in the Cascadia region. Can J For Res 52(2):227–236. https://doi.org/10.1139/CJFR-2021-0063
Siegner M, Panwar R, Kozak R (2021) Community forest enterprises and social enterprises: the confluence of two streams of literatures for addressing sustainability in natural resources. Social Enterp J 17(4):584–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-10-2020-0096
Siegner M, Pinkse J, Panwar R (2018) Managing tensions in a social enterprise: the complex balancing act to deliver a multi-faceted but coherent social mission. J Clean Prod 174:1314–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.076
Sikora AT, Nybakk E, Panwar R (2016) The effect of entrepreneurial and learning orientations on financial performance in a transition economy: evidence from forest contracting firms in southern Poland. Scand J For Res 31(1):119–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1079642
Sinha H, Suar D (2005) Leadership and people’s participation in community forestry. Int J Rural Manag 1(1):125–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/097306800400100107
Teitelbaum S (2014) Criteria and indicators for the assessment of community forestry outcomes: a comparative analysis from Canada. J Environ Manag 132:257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.013
Teitelbaum S (2016) Community forests in Canada: Lessons from policy and practice. UBC Press, Vancouver
Teitelbaum S, Beckely TM, Nadeau S (2006) A national portrait of community forestry in Canada. For Chron 82(3):416–428
Wangrow DB, Schepker DJ, Barker VL (2015) Managerial discretion: an empirical review and focus on future research directions. J Manag 41(1):99–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314554214
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest The authors did their due diligence to avoid bias or other influences on the quality of the study or the data that could have been caused by study funders/affiliations (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)). There were no conflicts of interest.
Ethics Approval
The study was approved via the Behavioural Research Ethics Board (BREB) at the University of British Columbia, Canada, #H18-01703.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Siegner, M., Kozak, R. & Panwar, R. The Effect of Managers’ Personal Characteristics on the Performance of Community Forest Enterprises. Small-scale Forestry 22, 381–399 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-022-09533-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-022-09533-9