Abstract
Full characterization of granite waste sludge (GWS) was accomplished by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Xray fluorescence (XRF) for identification of its phase and chemical composition. Different leaching tests were conducted to determine the efficiency of the GWS for metal stabilization in hazardous sludge. The leaching of the metals from stabilized contaminated sludge was decreased as the GWS amount increased. Only 15% of GWS was sufficient for stabilization of all metal ions under investigation. The main reason for metal immobilization was attributed to the aluminosilicates or silicates matrix within the GWS, which can transform the metals in the form of their insoluble hydroxides or absorbed in the stabilized matrix. Also, solidification/stabilization technique was used for remediation of contaminated sludge. Compressive strength test after curing for 28 days was used for measuring the effectiveness of remediation technique; it was found to be 1. 88MPa. This indicated that the remediated sludge was well solidified and safe to be used as a raw substance for roadway blocks. Therefore, this huge amount of by-product sludge derived from the granite cutting industry, which has a negative environmental impact due to its disposal, can be utilized as a binder material for solidification/stabilization of hazardous sludge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA, 2010), Country report on the solid waste management. http://www. sweep-net.org/ckfinder/userfiles/files/country-profiles/rapport-Egypte-en. pdf.
Q. Guangren, C. Yali, C. Pengcheong and T. Joohwa, J. Hazard. Mater., 129, 274 (2006).
S. Alejandro and N. Jacint, Chemosphere, 68, 703 (2007).
M. S. Bilgili, A. Demir, M. Ince and B. Ozkaya, J. Hazard. Mater., 145, 186 (2006).
M. A. Knecht, Overview of U. S. Federal Laws and Regulations Affecting Mixed Waste Treatment. In: Hazardous and Radioactive Waste Treatment Technologies Handbook, CRP Press, ISBN 978-08493-9586-4 (2001).
I. Buj, J. Torras, M. Rovira and J. de Pablo, J. Hazard. Mater., 175, 789 (2010).
A. M. Ashmawy, H. S. Ibrahim, S. M. Abdel Moniem and T. S. Saleh, Toxicol. Environ. Chem., 94(9), 1657 (2012).
D. Tomasevic, M. B. Dalmacija, M. D. j. Prica, B. D. Dalmacija, D. V. Kerkez, M. R. Becelic-Tomin and S. D. Roncevic, Chemosphere, 92(11), 1490 (2013).
M. R. Lasheen, A. M. Ashmawy, H. S. Ibrahim and S. M. Abdel Moniem, Desalination and Water Treatment, 51, 2644 (2013).
F. Garrido, V. Illera, M. T. Garci and a-Gonza lez, Appl. Geochemistry, 20(2), 397 (2005).
P. Torres, H. R. Fernandes, S. Agathopoulos, D. U. Tulyaganov and J. M. F. Ferreira, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 24, 3177 (2004).
R. R. Menezes, H. S. Ferreira, G. A. Neves, H. de L. Lira and H. C. Ferreira, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 25(7), 1149 (2005).
P. Torres, H. R. Fernandes, S. Olhero and J. M. F. Ferreira, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 29(1), 23 (2009).
I. Mármol, P. Ballester, S. Cerro, G. Monrós, J. Morales and L. Sánchez, Cem. Concr. Compos., 32(8), 617 (2010).
S. N. Monteiro, L. A. Peçanha and C. M. F. Vieira, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 24, 2349 (2004.
American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd Ed. Washington D. C. (2012).
R. G. McLaren and L. M. Clucas, J. Environ. Qual., 30, 1968 (2001).
G. Kandpal, B. Ram, P. C. Srivastava and S. K. Singh, J. Hazard. Mater., 106B, 133 (2004).
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM, 1991). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part II, Philadelphia: ASTM.
European Committee for Standardization, (ENV 12176, 2000). Characterization of sludge -Determination of pH-value. Brussels, Belgium. http://www. ecn. nl/docs/society/horizontal/hor15_ph. pdf.
European Council Decision 2003/33/EC. Establishing criteria and procedures for the acceptance of waste at landfills pursuant to Article 16 of and Annex II to Directive 1999/31/EC. Journal of the European Communities.
U. S. EPA, Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), Federal Register, 40 CFR 50, No. 286, 406 (1986.
U. S. EPA, Training module on Hazardous Waste Identification (40 CFR Parts 261), Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5305W), EPA 530-K-05-012 (2005).
U. S. EPA, Multiple Extraction Procedure (MEP) Method 1320, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-846), 4 (1986).
K. S. L. Lo and Y. H. Chen, Sci. Total Environ., 90, 99 (1990).
Abdul Ghaffar, Removal and stabilization of chromium metal ions from industrial effluents, Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry, (EJEAFCHE), 5(2), 1286 (2006).
R. A. Shawabkeh, J. Hazard. Mater., B 125, 237 (2005).
C. Pérez-Sirvent, M. L. García-Lorenzo, M. J. Martínez-Sánchez, M. C. Navarro, J. Marimón and J. Bech, Environment International, 33, 502 (2007).
G. Xu, M. Liu and G. Li, J. Hazard. Mater., 260(15), 74 (2013).
H. Zhang, Y. Zhao and J. Qi, J. Hazard. Mater., 141(1), 106 (2007.
U. S. EPA, Stabilization/Solidification of CERCLA and RCRA Wastes: Physical Tests, Chemical Testing Procedures, Technology Screening, and Field Activities. EPA/625/6-89/022, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Research Information, Cincinnati, Ohio (1989).
J. Naji, Journal of Science and Technology-Yemen, 7(2), 2002 (2002).
A. M. Marabini, P. Plescia, D. Maccari, F. Burragato and M. Pelino, Int. J. Miner. Process., 53(1-2), 121 (1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lasheen, M.R., Ashmawy, A.M., Ibrahim, H.S. et al. Immobilization technologies for the management of hazardous industrial waste using granite waste (case study). Korean J. Chem. Eng. 33, 914–921 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0187-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0187-7