Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of carbonyls and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in residences in Beijing, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and carbonyl compounds were measured both indoors and outdoors in 50 residences of Beijing in heating (December, 2011) and non-heating seasons (April/May, 2012). SUMMA canisters for VOCs and diffusive samplers for carbonyl compounds were deployed for 24 h at each site, and 94 compounds were quantified. Formaldehyde, acetone and acetaldehyde were the most abundant carbonyl compounds both indoors and outdoors with indoor median concentrations being 32.1, 21.7 and 15.3 μg·m−3, respectively. Ethane (17.6 μg·m−3), toluene (14.4 μg·m−3), propane (11.2 μg·m−3), ethene (8.40 μg·m−3), n-butane (6.87 μg·m−3), and benzene (5.95 μg·m−3) showed the high median concentrations in indoor air. Dichloromethane, pdichlorobenzene (p-DCB) and toluene exhibited extremely high levels in some residences, which were related with a number of indoor emission sources. Moreover, isoprene, pdichlorobenzene and carbonyls showed median indoor/ outdoor (I/O) ratios larger than 3, indicating their indoor sources were prevailing. Chlorinated compounds like CFCs were mainly from outdoor sources for their I/O ratios being less than 1. In addition, indoor concentrations between two sampling seasons varied with different compounds. Carbonyl compounds and some chlorinated compounds had higher concentrations in the non-heating season, while alkanes, alkenes, aromatic compounds showed an increase in the heating season. Indoor concentration of VOCs and carbonyls were influenced by locations, interior decorations and indoor activities, however the specific sources for indoor VOCs and carbonyls could not be easily identified. The findings obtained in this study would significantly enhance our understandings on the prevalent and abundant species of VOCs as well as their concentrations and sources in Beijing residences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IARC. Overall Evaluation of Carcinogenicity to Humans, Formaldehyde [50-00-0] Monographs Series, Vol 88. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. Indoor air quality guidelines, selected pollutants. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wolkoff P, Nielsen G D. Non-cancer effects of formaldehyde and relevance for setting an indoor air guideline. Environment International, 2010, 36(7): 788–799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones A P. Indoor air quality and health. Atmospheric Environment, 1999, 33(28): 4535–4564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown S K, Sim M R, Abramson M J, Gray C N. Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in indoor air — A review. Indoor Air, 1994, 4(2): 123–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dawson H E, McAlary T. A compilation of statistics for VOCs from post-1990 indoor air concentration studies in north American residences unaffected by subsurface vapor intrusion. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 2009, 29(1): 60–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallace L A. Personal exposures, indoor and outdoor air concentrations, and exhaled breath concentrations of selected volatile organic-compounds measured for 600 residences of New- Jersey, North-Dakota, North-Carolina and California. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 1986, 12(3–4): 215–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weisel C P, Zhang J, Turpin B J, Morandi M T, Colome S, Stock T H, Spektor D M, Korn L, Winer A, Alimokhtari S, Kwon J, Mohan K, Harrington R, Giovannetti R, Cui W, Afshar M, Maberti S, Shendell D. The relationships of indoor, outdoor and personal air (RIOPA) study: study design, methods and initial results. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 2005, 15(2): 123–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu J, Newhook R, Marro L, Chan C C. Selected volatile organic compounds in residential air in the city of Ottawa, Canada. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(11): 3964–3971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jia C, Batterman S, Godwin C. VOCs in industrial, urban and suburban neighborhoods, Part 1: Indoor and outdoor concentrations, variation, and risk drivers. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(9): 2083–2100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohura T, Amagai T, Senga Y, Fusaya M. Organic air pollutants inside and outside residences in Shimizu, Japan: levels, sources and risks. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 366(2–3): 485–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baya M P, Bakeas E B, Siskos P A. Volatile organic compounds in the air of 25 Greek homes. Indoor and Built Environment, 2004, 13(1): 53–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang X, Bai Y, Duong A, Smith M T, Li L, Zhang L. Formaldehyde in China: production, consumption, exposure levels, and health effects. Environment International, 2009, 35(8): 1210–1224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohura T, Amagai T, Shen X Y, Li S A, Zhang P, Zhu L Z. Comparative study on indoor air quality in Japan and China: Characteristics of residential indoor and outdoor VOCs. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(40): 6352–6359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang B, Lee S C, Ho K F. Characteristics of carbonyls: Concentrations and source strengths for indoor and outdoor residential microenvironments in China. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41(13): 2851–2861

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gleit A. Estimation for small normal data sets with detection limits. Environmental Science & Technology, 1985, 19(12): 1201–1206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Salthammer T, Mentese S, Marutzky R. Formaldehyde in the indoor environment. Chemical Reviews, 2010, 110(4): 2536–2572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marchand C, Buillot B, Le Calve S, Mirabel P. Aldehyde measurements in indoor environments in Strasbourg (France). Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(7): 1336–1345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Watson J G, Chow J C, Fujita E M. Review of volatile organic compound source apportionment by chemical mass balance. Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35(9): 1567–1584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. ATSDR. Toxicological profile for methylene chloride (update). Draft for Public Comment. Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  21. ATSDR. Toxicological profile for dichlorobenzene, agency for toxic substances and disease registry. US Department of Health & Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  22. Polzin G M, Kosa-Maines R E, Ashley D L, Watson C H. Analysis of volatile organic compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(4): 1297–1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Guo H, Lee S C, Li W M, Cao J J. Source characterization of BTEX in indoor microenvironments in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(1): 73–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ilgen E, Karfich N, Levsen K, Angerer J, Schneider P, Heinrich J, Wichmann H E, Dunemann L, Begerow J. Aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmospheric environment: Part I. Indoor versus outdoor sources, the influence of traffic. Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35(7): 1235–1252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Buczynska A J, Krata A, Stranger M, Godoi A F L, Kontozova-Deutsch V, Bencs L, Naveau I, Roekens E, Van Grieken R. Atmospheric BTEX-concentrations in an area with intensive street traffic. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(2): 311–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sax S N, Bennett D H, Chillrud S N, Kinney P L, Spengler J D. Differences in source emission rates of volatile organic compounds in inner-city residences of New York City and Los Angeles. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 2004, 14(Suppl 1): S95–S109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Weng M, Zhu L, Yang K, Chen S. Levels, sources, and health risks of carbonyls in residential indoor air in Hangzhou, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2010, 163(1–4): 573–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang H, Wang B, Lee S C, Zeng B Q. Indoor/outdoor carbonyl compounds in Guangzhou residences. Journal of Analytical Science, 2008, 24(1): 42–46

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Q, Liu Y, Zhang M. Personal exposure and source characteristics of carbonyl compounds and BTEXs within homes in Beijing, China. Building and Environment, 2013, 61: 210–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim Y M, Harrad S, Harrison R M. Concentrations and sources of VOCs in urban domestic and public microenvironments. Environmental Science & Technology, 2001, 35(6): 997–1004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo H, Kwok N H, Cheng H R, Lee S C, Hung W T, Li Y S. Formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds in Hong Kong homes: concentrations and impact factors. Indoor Air, 2009, 19(3): 206–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou J, You Y, Bai Z, Hu Y, Zhang J, Zhang N. Health risk assessment of personal inhalation exposure to volatile organic compounds in Tianjin, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2011, 409(3): 452–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Edwards R D, Jurvelin J, Koistinen K, Saarela K, Jantunen M. VOC source identification from personal and residential indoor, outdoor and workplace microenvironment samples in EXPOLIS-Helsinki, Finland. Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35(28): 4829–4841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jia C R, Batterman S, Godwin C. VOCs in industrial, urban and suburban neighborhoods, Part 1: Indoor and outdoor concentrations, variation, and risk drivers. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(9): 2083–2100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fenske J D, Paulson S E. Human breath emissions of VOCs. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1999, 49(5): 594–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wiglusz R, Sitko E, Nikel G, Jarnuszkiewicz I, Igielska B. The effect of temperature on the emission of formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from laminate flooring-case study. Building and Environment, 2002, 37(1): 41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Parthasarathy S, Maddalena R L, Russell M L, Apte M G. Effect of temperature and humidity on formaldehyde emissions in temporary housing units. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2011, 61(6): 689–695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lary D J, Shallcross D E. Central role of carbonyl compounds in atmospheric chemistry. Journal of Geophysical Research, D, Atmospheres, 2000, 105(D15): 19771–19778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Weschler C J. Chemistry in indoor environments: 20 years of research. Indoor Air-International Journal of Indoor Air Quality and Climate, 2011, 21(3): 205–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaorong Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, H., Liu, X., Yan, M. et al. Characteristics of carbonyls and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in residences in Beijing, China. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 10, 73–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0743-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0743-0

Keywords

Navigation