Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of water quantity exchange between groundwater and the Platte River water, central Nebraska

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors demonstrate the importance of the simulation of the water quantity exchange between river water and groundwater to a better understanding of the hydrologic relations between a river and nearby aquifer where groundwater is pumped extensively but only seasonally. And MODFLOW is used to design the stream-aquifer model in which the pumpage of more than 1000 wells was simulated. The river gaining and river losing processes were analyzed. Simulation results suggest that continuation of over-extraction of groundwater will gradually increase the depletion volume in the river year after year and more depletion will occur in later years. The exchange manner between groundwater and the Platte River differs from place to place. The Platte River loses water to the adjacent aquifer in the west part of the study area, and gains water from the adjacent aquifer in the east part of the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Theis C V. The effect of a well on the flow of a nearby stream [J]. American Geophysical Union Transactions, 1941, 22(3): 734–738.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glover R E and Balmer G G. River depletion resulting from pumping a well near a river[J]. American Geophysical Union Transaction, 1954, 35(3): 468–470.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hantush M S. Depletion of Storage, Leakance, and river flow by gravity wells in sloping sands[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1964, 69(12): 2551–2560.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hunt B. Unsteady stream depletion from ground water pumping[J]. Ground Water, 1999, 37(1): 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sophocleous M, Koussis A, Martin J L, et al. Evacuation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration[J]. Ground Water, 1995, 33(4): 579–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen X H and Yin Y. Streamflow depletion: modeling of reduced baseflow and induced stream infiltration from seasonally pumped wells[J]. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 2001, 37(1): 185–195.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen X H, Goeke J and Summerside S. Hydraulic properties and uncertainty analysis for an unconfined alluvial aquifer [J]. Ground Water, 1999, 37(6): 845–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harbaugh W A and McDonald G M., User’s documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U S Geological Survey Modular Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model[R]. U S Geological Survey, Open-File Report 96-485, Reston, Virginia, 1996. 2–56.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Foundation item: United State Geological Survey Grant (No. 1434-HQ-96-GR-02683)

Biography of the first author: SHU Long-cang, Dr., professor, born in 1964, majoring in groundwater resources evaluation and management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shu, Lc., Chen, Xh. Simulation of water quantity exchange between groundwater and the Platte River water, central Nebraska. J Cent. South Univ. Technol. 9, 212–215 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-002-0029-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-002-0029-8

Key words

Navigation