Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is YouTube a high-quality source of information on cancer rehabilitation?

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Searching for information on the Internet, especially YouTubeTM, is gaining popularity for cancer survivors. Based on the topic of online health information, the importance of studies using YouTube data for various cancer types and treatment methods has increased. This study aims to investigate the quality, reliability, and accuracy of YouTube videos on cancer rehabilitation (CR).

Methods

YouTube search was performed on February 26th, 2021, with two keyword sets: “cancer rehabilitation” and “oncology rehabilitation.” The modified DISCERN, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scoring system, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) were used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. The features of each video such as the number of likes, dislikes, and views, upload date, duration, like ratio, and the uploader profile were also collected.

Results

Fifty-three of the first 200 videos shown in the search results met the criteria. Most of the videos were low quality. The most common uploader profile was academic institute/university hospital. The three most common subjects in the videos were CR definition, physical therapy and occupational therapy, and patient experiences. The mean modified DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores were 2.14, 2.03, and 2.78, respectively. Higher quality videos had longer duration, greater number of views, and better reliability scores.

Conclusion

The results showed that most of the rated videos were of low-quality and didn’t provide sufficient information on the topic discussed. Higher-quality and more accurate YouTube videos are needed to increase awareness of CR.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

For cancer survivors, CR-related YouTube video content often provides information of low reliability. In this context, it is necessary to focus on the production of video content that includes clinical guides, references, and are based on clinical-based practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO. Cancer. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer.

  2. Kilgore EM, Pineda CG. Balance and gait dysfunction in the cancer patients. In: O’Dell MW, Stubblefield MD, editors. Cancer rehabilitation: principles and practice. New York: Demos Medical; 2009.

  3. Sokolof JM, Aghalar MR, Stubblefield MD. Physical rehabilitation for cancer survivors. 2017. www.uptodate.com. UpToDate in Waltham, MA. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.

  4. Maehr B, Keilani M, Wiltschke C, Hassler M, Licht T, Marosi C, et al. Cancer rehabilitation in Austria—aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2016;166(1–2):39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Askin A, Sengul L, Tosun A. YouTube as a Source of Information for transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke: a quality, reliability and accuracy analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(12):105309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexa Traffic Rank [February 24, 2021]. Available from: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com.

  7. Stellefson M, Chaney B, Ochipa K, Chaney D, Haider Z, Hanik B, et al. YouTube as a source of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a social media content analysis. Chron Respir Dis. 2014;11(2):61–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972314525058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pant S, Deshmukh A, Murugiah K, Kumar G, Sachdeva R, Mehta JL. Assessing the credibility of the “YouTube approach” to health information on acute myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(5):281–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.21981.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tackett S, Slinn K, Marshall T, Gaglani S, Waldman V, Desai R. Medical education videos for the world: an analysis of viewing patterns for a YouTube channel. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1150–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Topps D, Helmer J, Ellaway R. YouTube as a platform for publishing clinical skills training videos. Acad Med. 2013;88(2):192–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c5352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ovenden CD, Brooks FM. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion YouTube videos as a source of patient education. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(6):987–91. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.987.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozsoy-Unubol T, Alanbay-Yagci E. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24(2):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.14043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899–903. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.111114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, van VeldhuyzenZanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Okamura H. Importance of rehabilitation in cancer treatment and palliative medicine. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011;41(6):733–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyr061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bahar-Ozdemir Y, Akyuz G. Kanser hastalarında fiziksel rehabilitasyonun zorlukları. In: Kapukaya A, editor. Kanserli Hastalarda Psikososyal ve Fiziksel Rehabilitasyon. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2021. p. 41–5. 

  17. De Groef A, Penen F, Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Nijs J, Meeus M. Best-evidence rehabilitation for chronic pain part 2: pain during and after cancer treatment. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7) https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070979

  18. Sahin AN, Sahin AS, Schwenter F, Sebajang H. YouTube videos as a source of information on colorectal cancer: what do our patients learn? J Cancer Educ. 2019;34(6):1160–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1422-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bae SS, Baxter S. YouTube videos in the English language as a patient education resource for cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(5):1941–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0681-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Ekici U, Gurkan A. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in sleeve gastrectomy videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5):1477–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTubeTM video analysis. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(2):208–14. https://doi.org/10.2319/090717-602.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chou WY, Hunt Y, Folkers A, Augustson E. Cancer survivorship in the age of YouTube and social media: a narrative analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e7. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1569.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Eddens KS, Kreuter MW, Morgan JC, Beatty KE, Jasim SA, Garibay L, et al. Disparities by race and ethnicity in cancer survivor stories available on the web. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e50. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Radonjic A, Fat Hing NN, Harlock J, Naji F. YouTube as a source of patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(2):637–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khatri P, Singh SR, Belani NK, Yeong YL, Lohan R, Lim YW, et al. YouTube as source of information on 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak: a cross sectional study of English and Mandarin content. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;35:101636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101636.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Langford B, Hooten WM, D’Souza S, Moeschler S, D’Souza RS. YouTube as a source of medical information about spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2021;24(1):156–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the patients who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: YBO, TOU.

Acquisition of data: YBO, TOU.

Analysis and interpretation of data: YBO, TOU.

Drafting of manuscript: YBO.

Critical revision: GA, YBO.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeliz Bahar-Ozdemir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahar-Ozdemir, Y., Ozsoy-Unubol, T. & Akyuz, G. Is YouTube a high-quality source of information on cancer rehabilitation?. J Cancer Surviv 16, 1016–1022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01093-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01093-9

Keywords

Navigation