Abstract
Background
Searching for information on the Internet, especially YouTubeTM, is gaining popularity for cancer survivors. Based on the topic of online health information, the importance of studies using YouTube data for various cancer types and treatment methods has increased. This study aims to investigate the quality, reliability, and accuracy of YouTube videos on cancer rehabilitation (CR).
Methods
YouTube search was performed on February 26th, 2021, with two keyword sets: “cancer rehabilitation” and “oncology rehabilitation.” The modified DISCERN, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scoring system, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) were used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. The features of each video such as the number of likes, dislikes, and views, upload date, duration, like ratio, and the uploader profile were also collected.
Results
Fifty-three of the first 200 videos shown in the search results met the criteria. Most of the videos were low quality. The most common uploader profile was academic institute/university hospital. The three most common subjects in the videos were CR definition, physical therapy and occupational therapy, and patient experiences. The mean modified DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores were 2.14, 2.03, and 2.78, respectively. Higher quality videos had longer duration, greater number of views, and better reliability scores.
Conclusion
The results showed that most of the rated videos were of low-quality and didn’t provide sufficient information on the topic discussed. Higher-quality and more accurate YouTube videos are needed to increase awareness of CR.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
For cancer survivors, CR-related YouTube video content often provides information of low reliability. In this context, it is necessary to focus on the production of video content that includes clinical guides, references, and are based on clinical-based practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
WHO. Cancer. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer.
Kilgore EM, Pineda CG. Balance and gait dysfunction in the cancer patients. In: O’Dell MW, Stubblefield MD, editors. Cancer rehabilitation: principles and practice. New York: Demos Medical; 2009.
Sokolof JM, Aghalar MR, Stubblefield MD. Physical rehabilitation for cancer survivors. 2017. www.uptodate.com. UpToDate in Waltham, MA. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.
Maehr B, Keilani M, Wiltschke C, Hassler M, Licht T, Marosi C, et al. Cancer rehabilitation in Austria—aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2016;166(1–2):39–43.
Askin A, Sengul L, Tosun A. YouTube as a Source of Information for transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke: a quality, reliability and accuracy analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(12):105309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309.
Alexa Traffic Rank [February 24, 2021]. Available from: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com.
Stellefson M, Chaney B, Ochipa K, Chaney D, Haider Z, Hanik B, et al. YouTube as a source of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a social media content analysis. Chron Respir Dis. 2014;11(2):61–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972314525058.
Pant S, Deshmukh A, Murugiah K, Kumar G, Sachdeva R, Mehta JL. Assessing the credibility of the “YouTube approach” to health information on acute myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(5):281–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.21981.
Tackett S, Slinn K, Marshall T, Gaglani S, Waldman V, Desai R. Medical education videos for the world: an analysis of viewing patterns for a YouTube channel. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1150–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002118.
Topps D, Helmer J, Ellaway R. YouTube as a platform for publishing clinical skills training videos. Acad Med. 2013;88(2):192–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c5352.
Ovenden CD, Brooks FM. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion YouTube videos as a source of patient education. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(6):987–91. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.987.
Ozsoy-Unubol T, Alanbay-Yagci E. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24(2):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.14043.
Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899–903. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.111114.
Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, van VeldhuyzenZanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x.
Okamura H. Importance of rehabilitation in cancer treatment and palliative medicine. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011;41(6):733–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyr061.
Bahar-Ozdemir Y, Akyuz G. Kanser hastalarında fiziksel rehabilitasyonun zorlukları. In: Kapukaya A, editor. Kanserli Hastalarda Psikososyal ve Fiziksel Rehabilitasyon. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2021. p. 41–5.
De Groef A, Penen F, Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Nijs J, Meeus M. Best-evidence rehabilitation for chronic pain part 2: pain during and after cancer treatment. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7) https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070979
Sahin AN, Sahin AS, Schwenter F, Sebajang H. YouTube videos as a source of information on colorectal cancer: what do our patients learn? J Cancer Educ. 2019;34(6):1160–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1422-9.
Bae SS, Baxter S. YouTube videos in the English language as a patient education resource for cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(5):1941–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0681-5.
Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Ekici U, Gurkan A. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in sleeve gastrectomy videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5):1477–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTubeTM video analysis. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(2):208–14. https://doi.org/10.2319/090717-602.1.
Chou WY, Hunt Y, Folkers A, Augustson E. Cancer survivorship in the age of YouTube and social media: a narrative analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e7. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1569.
Eddens KS, Kreuter MW, Morgan JC, Beatty KE, Jasim SA, Garibay L, et al. Disparities by race and ethnicity in cancer survivor stories available on the web. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e50. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1163.
Radonjic A, Fat Hing NN, Harlock J, Naji F. YouTube as a source of patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(2):637–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.230.
Khatri P, Singh SR, Belani NK, Yeong YL, Lohan R, Lim YW, et al. YouTube as source of information on 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak: a cross sectional study of English and Mandarin content. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;35:101636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101636.
Langford B, Hooten WM, D’Souza S, Moeschler S, D’Souza RS. YouTube as a source of medical information about spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2021;24(1):156–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13303.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the patients who participated in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception and design: YBO, TOU.
Acquisition of data: YBO, TOU.
Analysis and interpretation of data: YBO, TOU.
Drafting of manuscript: YBO.
Critical revision: GA, YBO.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bahar-Ozdemir, Y., Ozsoy-Unubol, T. & Akyuz, G. Is YouTube a high-quality source of information on cancer rehabilitation?. J Cancer Surviv 16, 1016–1022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01093-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01093-9