Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond broadband: digital inclusion as a driver of inequities in access to rural cancer care

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Rural cancer survivors have worse quality of life than their urban counterparts. Telemedicine is a potential solution to connecting rural residents with specialized cancer providers during the survivorship period, but limitations in broadband may stifle the impact. Using data from a feasibility study evaluating a telemedicine intervention aimed at connecting rural Virginia cancer survivors with their care team located at a cancer center associated with an academic medical center, we sought to evaluate the ability of rural survivors to access the intervention and suggest strategies for improving access to rural cancer survivorship care.

Methods

We used a descriptive design with geospatial and quantitative methods to understand broadband access, driving time to a satellite telemedicine site, and ability to utilize a borrowed cellular-enabled tablet to participate in the intervention for cancer survivors living in Central Virginia.

Results

Our study participants resided in census tracts where an average of 58% of households have adequate broadband access necessary to support a telemedicine videoconferencing intervention. Average driving time to the nearest telemedicine site was 29.6 min. Those who utilized the borrowed tablet experienced considerable difficulty with utilizing the technology.

Conclusions

Rural cancer populations do not have equal access to a cancer survivorship telemedicine intervention.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Telemedicine interventions aimed at connecting cancer survivors with their academic medical center-based cancer providers may be ineffective if survivors do not have access to either fixed broadband or a satellite clinic. Future research needs to evaluate other sites from which rural survivors can connect, such as rural public libraries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. In: Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, editors. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington D.C: National Academies Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kline RM, Arora NK, Bradley CJ, Brauer ER, Graves DL, Lunsford NB, et al. Long-term survivorship care after cancer treatment—summary of a 2017 National Cancer Policy Forum Workshop. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(12):1300–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenthal ET. Survivorship care plans: compliance deadline looming, but most oncologists still not providing. Oncol Times [Internet]. 2014;36(10):10–2 Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=cin20&AN=2012608422&site=ehost-live.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birken SA, Mayer DK. Survivorship care planning: why is it taking so long? J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2017;15(9):1165–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weaver KE, Geiger AM, Lu L, Case LD. Rural-urban disparities in health status among US cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(5):1050–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh GK, Siahpush M. Widening rural–urban disparities in all-cause mortality and mortality from major causes of death in the USA, 1969–2009. J Urban Health. 2013:1–21.

  7. Kumar P, Casarett D, Corcoran A, Desai K, Li Q, Chen J, et al. Utilization of Supportive and palliative care services among oncology outpatients at one academic cancer center. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(8):923–930.

  8. DeGuzman PB, Sheffield C, Hauser LR, Sherman J, Keim-Malpass J. Understanding gaps in patient navigation for rural cancer patients and survivors. J Navig Surviv. 2015;6(5):33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pesut B, Robinson CA, Bottorff JL, Fyles G, Broughton S. On the road again: patient perspectives on commuting for palliative care. Palliat Support Care [Internet]. 2010;8(02):187–95 Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/div-class-title-on-the-road-again-patient-perspectives-on-commuting-for-palliative-care-div/6F19C0A92413B1CACE358B5AB8919BCE.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paul CL, Hall AE, Carey ML, Cameron EC, Clinton-McHarg T. Access to care and impacts of cancer on daily life: do they differ for metropolitan versus regional hematological cancer survivors? J Rural Health [Internet]. 2013;29(Suppl 1):s43–50. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wenzel J, Jones RA, Klimmek R, Krumm S, Darrell LP, Song D, et al. Cancer support and resource needs among African American older adults. Clin J Oncol Nurs [Internet]. 2012;16(4):372–7 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4659371/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong ST, Regan S. Patient perspectives on primary health care in rural communities: effects of geography on access, continuity and efficiency. Rural Remote Health. 2009;9(1):1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The American Telemedicine Association. About telemedicine [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 12]. Available from: http://www.americantelemed.org/about/telehealth-faqs-.

  14. World Health Organization. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states. Report on the second global survey on eHealth. World Health Organization; 2010.

  15. Collie K, Kreshka MA, Ferrier S, Parsons R, Graddy K, Avram S, et al. Videoconferencing for delivery of breast cancer support groups to women living in rural communities: a pilot study. Psychol. 2007;16(8):778–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Doorenbos AZ, Demiris G, Towle C, Kundu A, Revels L, Colven R, et al. Developing the native people for cancer control telehealth network. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(1):30–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou ES, Partridge AH, Blackmon JE, Morgan E, Recklitis CJ. A pilot videoconference group stress management program in cancer survivors: lessons learned. Rural Remote Health. 2016;16(2):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shepherd L, Goldstein D, Whitford H, Thewes B, Brummell V, Hicks M. The utility of videoconferencing to provide innovative delivery of psychological treatment for rural cancer patients: results of a pilot study. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2006;32(5):453–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Holland JC, Andersen B, Breitbart WS, Buchmann LO, Compas B, Deshields TL, et al. Distress management. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11(2):190–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brant JM, Wickham R. In: Brandt JM, Wickham R, editors. Statement on the scope and standards of oncology nursing practice: generalist and advanced practice. Pittsburg: Oncology Nursing Society; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ryan H, Schofield P, Cockburn J, Butow P, Tattersall M, Turner J, et al. How to recognize and manage psychological distress in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2005;14(1):7–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jefford M, Gough K, Drosdowsky A, Russell L, Aranda S, Butow P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a nurse-led supportive care package (SurvivorCare) for survivors of colorectal cancer. Oncologist. 2016;21(8):1014.

  23. Whitacre BE, Wheeler D, Landgraf C. What can the national broadband map tell us about the health care connectivity gap? J Rural Health. 2017;33(3):284–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Margolis PR. Options for increasing the use of telemental health services in the Commonwealth—final report to the governor and the general assembly of Virginia. Richmond; 2018.

  25. Federal Communications Commission. 2016 Broadband Progress Report. Report FCC 16-6. Washington D.C.; 2016.

  26. Blanch-Hartigan D, Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, Smith T, Nekhlyudov L, Ganz PA, et al. Provision and discussion of survivorship care plans among cancer survivors: results of a nationally representative survey of oncologists and primary care physicians. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15):1578–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McCabe MS, Jacobs L. Survivorship care: models and programs. Semin Oncol Nurs [Internet]. 2008;24(3):202–7 Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=med5&AN=18687266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Isaacson MJ, Hulme PA, Cowan J, Kerkvliet J. Cancer survivorship care plans: processes, effective strategies, and challenges in a Northern Plains rural state. Public Health Nurs [Internet]. 2018;35(4):291–8 Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=medl&NEWS=N&AN=29460295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Charlton M, Schlichting J, Chioreso C, Ward M, Vikas P. Challenges of rural cancer care in the United States. Oncology. 2015;29(9).

  30. Railton C, Lupichuk S, McCormick J, Zhong L, Ko JJ, Walley B, et al. Discharge to primary care for survivorship follow-up: how are patients with early-stage breast cancer faring? J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2015;13(6):762–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bober SL, Recklitis CJ, Campbell EG, Park ER, Kutner JS, Najita JS, et al. Caring for cancer survivors: a survey of primary care physicians. Cancer. 2009;115(SUPPL. 18):4409–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Drake BF, Abadin SS, Lyons S, Chang S-H, Steward LT, Kraenzle S, et al. Mammograms on-the-go-predictors of repeat visits to mobile mammography vans in St Louis, Missouri, USA: a case-control study. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2015;5(3):e006960 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4368932&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nyarko E, Metz JM, Nguyen GT, Hampshire MK, Jacobs LA, Mao JJ. Cancer survivors’ perspectives on delivery of survivorship care by primary care physicians: an internet-based survey. BMC Fam Pract [Internet]. 2015;16(1):1–8. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0367-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sabesan S, Centre TCT, Centre TCT, Kelly J. Are teleoncology models merely about avoiding long distance travel for patients? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014;23(6):745–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. DeGuzman PB, Colliton KC, Nail C, Keim-Malpass J. Survivorship care plans: rural, low-income breast cancer survivor perspectives. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017;21(6):692–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jacobs LA, Shulman LN. Follow-up care of cancer survivors: challenges and solutions. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2017;18(1):e19–29. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30386-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tzelepis F, Paul CL, Sanson-fisher RW, Campbell HS, Bradstock K, Carey ML, et al. Unmet supportive care needs of haematological cancer survivors : rural versus urban residents. Ann Hematol. 2018;1283–1292.

  38. Sirintrapun SJ, Lopez AM. Telemedicine in cancer care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018;38:540–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Snowden A, White CA, Christie Z, Murray E, McGowan C, Scott R. The clinical utility of the distress thermometer: a review. Br J Nurs [Internet]. 2011;20(4):220–7. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2011.20.4.220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Goedendorp MM, Andrykowski MA, Donovan KA, Jim HS, Phillips KM, Small BJ, et al. Prolonged impact of chemotherapy on fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2012;118(15):3833–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zainal NZ, Nik-Jaafar NR, Baharudin A, Sabki ZA, Ng CG. Prevalence of depression in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of observational studies. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(4):2649–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bonhof CS, Mols F, Vos MC, Pijnenborg JMA, Boll D, Vreugdenhil G, et al. Course of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and its impact on health-related quality of life among ovarian cancer patients: a longitudinal study. Gynecol Oncol [Internet]. 2018;149(3):455–63. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.052.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mols F, Vingerhoets AJJM, Coebergh JW, van de Poll-Franse LV. Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(17):2613–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cramer JD, Johnson JT, Nilsen ML. Pain in head and neck cancer survivors: prevalence, predictors, and quality-of-life impact. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (United States). 2018;159(5):853–858.

  45. Beaunoyer E, Arsenault M, Lomanowska AM, Guitton MJ. Understanding online health information: evaluation, tools, and strategies. Patient Educ Couns [Internet]. 2017;100(2):183–9. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 2013-2017 5-year estimates, Table(s) B28001, B28002 [Internet]. Available from: https://services.arcgis.com/P3ePLMYs2RVChkJx/arcgis/rest/services/ACS_Internet_Connectivity_Boundaries/FeatureServer

  47. ACS_Internet_Connectivity_Boundaries (FeatureServer) [Internet]. Available from: https://services.arcgis.com/P3ePLMYs2RVChkJx/arcgis/rest/services/ACS_Internet_Connectivity_Boundaries/FeatureServer

  48. Esri. How Hot Spot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) works [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/h-how-hot-spot-analysis-getis-ord-gi-spatial-stati.htm

  49. Dahlstrom KR, Calzada G, Hanby JD, Garden AS, Glisson BS, Li G, et al. An evolution in demographics, treatment, and outcomes of oropharyngeal cancer at a major cancer center: a staging system in need of repair. Cancer. 2013;119(1):81–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Greenberg AJ, Haney D, Blake KD, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Differences in access to and use of electronic personal health information between rural and urban residents in the United States. J Rural Health. 2018;34:s30–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Leimkuhler ME, Hauser L, Voges N, DeGuzman PB. Rural populations’ sources of cancer prevention and health promotion information. J Nurse Pract. Under Review.

  52. Rhinesmith C. Digital inclusion and meaningful broadband adoption initiatives digital inclusion and meaningful broadband adoption initiatives. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud. 1993;38:475–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pew Research Center. Digital gap between rural and nonrural America persists [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/31/digital-gap-between-rural-and-nonrural-america-persists/

  55. Campbell JI, Aturinda I, Mwesigwa E, Burns B, Haberer JE, Bangsberg DR, et al. The Technology Acceptance Model for Resource-Limited Settings (TAM-RLS): a novel framework for mobile health interventions targeted to low-literacy end-users in resource-limited settings. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(11):3129–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Russell TG, Gillespie N, Hartley N, Theodoros D, Hill A, Gray L. Exploring the predictors of home telehealth uptake by elderly Australian healthcare consumers. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(8):485–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Strover S. Public libraries and 21st century digital equity goals. Commun Res Pract. 2019;5(2):188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Real B, Rose RN. Rural libraries in the United States: recent strides, future possibilities, and meeting community needs [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://www.ala.org/advocacy/sites/ala.org.advocacy/files/content/pdfs/Rural paper 07-31-2017.pdf.

  59. Miller KA. Rural public library assets and socioeconomic demographics: a multi-classification study. Diss Abstr Int Sect A Humanit Soc Sci [Internet]. 2019; Available from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/2162886599?accountid=14744%0Ahttps://cbua-us.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/openurl?institution=34CBUA_US&vid=34CBUA_US:VU1&lang=es?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertation. Accessed 11 Jul 2019.

  60. Bertot JC, Real B, Jaeger PT. Public libraries building digital inclusive communities: data and findings from the 2013 Digital Inclusion Survey. Libr Q [Internet]. 2016;86(3):270–89. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1086/686674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Pelczar M, Frehill L, Williams K, Nielsen E. Institute of Museum and Library Services Public Libraries Survey Fiscal Year 2017. Data file documentation and user’s guide 2019.

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the University of Virginia Cancer Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Pam Baker DeGuzman, Veronica Bernacchi & Ivora D. Hinton

  2. University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Pam Baker DeGuzman, C. Allen Cupp, Brian Dunn, Mark J. Jameson, Debra Lynn Lewandowski & Christi Sheffield

  3. Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    B. J. Ferrebee Ghamandi & Mark J. Jameson

Authors
  1. Pam Baker DeGuzman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Veronica Bernacchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Allen Cupp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Brian Dunn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. J. Ferrebee Ghamandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ivora D. Hinton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mark J. Jameson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Debra Lynn Lewandowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Christi Sheffield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pam Baker DeGuzman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 2103 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeGuzman, P.B., Bernacchi, V., Cupp, C.A. et al. Beyond broadband: digital inclusion as a driver of inequities in access to rural cancer care. J Cancer Surviv 14, 643–652 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00874-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00874-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation