Skip to main content
Log in

Spiritual and Spatial Significance of Choedrak Monastery in the Cultural Geography of Bhutan

  • Research
  • Published:
Archaeologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ancient monasteries in Bhutan are an immense asset to the country both in terms of tangible architecture and intangible cultural and religious values. Initially, they were built owing to the interconnected spatial and spiritual significance of the particular place and its concerned divine master. These monasteries have prolifically aided in the propagation of Buddhism as well as defining the very architecture of Bhutan. However, due to the unavailability of rigorous research about it, many monasteries are off the radar of government and scholars with some of them in dire need of restoration. The paper attempts to document and highlight the spatial and spiritual significance of Tharpaling, particularly the Choedrak monastery, which is located in Chumey village under Bumthang district, Bhutan. Having been impregnated sacredness by the visit of Guru Rinpoche (precious master), the subsequent visit of Gyalwa Lorepa reassured the impetus for the transformation of a mere cave into a monastery complex. In conjunction with it, Choedrak is revered as one of the four sacred Drak (cliff) temples of Guru Rinpoche and attracts tourists as well as locals to receive blessings and for extended retreat purposes. Architecturally, the main temple of the Choedrak is a resemblance of a typical monastery architecture of Bhutan incorporating traditional features such as whitewashed tapering stone wall adorned with wooden windows, floating-like roof, and colorful elegance of the interiors. The current study is intended to further signify its place in the cultural heritage dictionary of Bhutan and consequently harness opportunities from the relevant agencies such as the Division for Conservation of Heritage Sites for appropriate and sound solutions for the preservation of the monastery.

Résumé De Recherche

Les monastères anciens au Bhoutan constituent un immense atout pour le pays que ce soit en termes d'architecture tangible que de valeurs culturelles et religieuses intangibles. Ils ont été construits initialement en raison de la signification spatiale et spirituelle interconnectée du lieu et de son maître divin en question. Ces monastères ont contribué de manière prolifique à la propagation du boudhisme ainsi qu'à la définition de l'architecture propre au Bhoutan. Cependant, en raison de l'indisponibilité d'une recherche rigoureuse à cet égard, de nombreux monastères ne suscitent pas l'intérêt du gouvernement et des chercheurs alors que certains d'entre eux ont un besoin pressant de travaux de restauration. L'article s'efforce de documenter et de mettre en exergue la signification spatiale et spiriturelle de Tharpaling, en particulier le monastère de Choedrak qui est situé dans le village de Chumey relevant du district de Bumthang, Bhoutan. Ayant été sacralisé par la visite de Guru Rinpoche (maître précieux), la visite ultérieure de Gyalwa Lorepa a confirmé l'élan d'une transformation d'une simple caverne en un complexe monastique. Conjointement à ce dernier, Choedrak est révéré comme l'un des quatre temples Drak (falaise) sacrés de Guru Rinpoche et il attire les touristes ainsi que les résidents locaux pour recevoir des bénédictions et faire des retraites prolongées. D'un point de vue architectural, le temple principal de Choedrak ressemble à l'architecture monastique typique du Bhoutan, incorporant des caractéristiques traditionnelles comme la muraille de pierre en angle et blanchie à la chaux, ornée de fenêtres de bois, une toiture semblant flotter et une élégance colorée des espaces intérieurs. L'étude actuelle a vocation à affirmer plus encore sa place dans le dictionnaire du patrimoine culturel du Bhoutan et à saisir en conséquence les opportunités issues des agences concernées telles que la Division pour la conservation des sites patrimoniaux (DCHS - Division for Conservation of Heritage Sites) afin de parvenir à des solutions adéquates et pertinentes pour la préservation du monastère.

Resumen

Los antiguos monasterios de Bután son un enorme activo para el país, tanto en términos de arquitectura tangible como de valores culturales y religiosos intangibles. Inicialmente, se construyeron debido a la importancia espacial y espiritual interconectada del lugar en particular y su maestro divino en cuestión. Estos monasterios han ayudado prolíficamente en la propagación del budismo, así como en la definición de la arquitectura misma de Bután. Sin embargo, debido a la falta de disponibilidad de una investigación rigurosa al respecto, muchos monasterios están fuera del radar del gobierno y los eruditos, y urge la restauración de algunos. Este artículo intenta documentar y resaltar el significado espacial y espiritual de Tharpaling, particularmente el monasterio Choedrak, que se encuentra en la aldea de Chumey en el distrito de Bumthang, Bután. Habiendo sido impregnada de sacralidad por la visita de Guru Rinpoche (maestro precioso), la visita subsecuente de Gyalwa Lorepa reforzó el ímpetu para la transformación de una mera cueva en un complejo de monasterio. Junto con él, Choedrak es venerado como uno de los cuatro templos sagrados Drak (de acantilado) de Guru Rinpoche y atrae tanto a turistas como a lugareños para recibir bendiciones y con fines de retiro prolongado. Arquitectónicamente, el templo principal de Choedrak se asemeja a la arquitectura típica de un monasterio de Bután que incorpora características tradicionales como una pared de piedra cónica encalada adornada con ventanas de madera, un techo flotante y la colorida elegancia de los interiores. El presente estudio tiene la intención de definir aún más su lugar en el diccionario del patrimonio cultural de Bután y, en consecuencia, aprovechar las oportunidades de las agencias relevantes, como la División para la Conservación de Sitios del Patrimonio (DCHS), para encontrar soluciones adecuadas y sólidas para la preservación del monasterio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, E. (2019). Deity citadels: Sacred sites of bio-cultural resistance and resilience in bhutan. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10040268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariffin, A., Mohd Zahari, M. S., & Hanafiah, M. (2020). Adaptive reuse of historic buildings: connecting the links between tourist appreciation and visitation. Property Management, ahead-of-p. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-04-2019-0019

  • Bhagwat, S. (2009). Ecosystem services and sacred natural sites: Reconciling material and non-material values in nature conservation. Environmental Values, 18, 417–427. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327109X12532653285731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehler, W., & Heinz, G. (1999). Documentation, surveying, photogrammetry. XVII CIPA Symposium. Recife, Olinda, Vol I.

  • Bullen, P. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29, 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111182439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1995). Buddhist stupa and Thai social practice. World Archaeology, 27(2), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1995.9980307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chettri, N., Gautam, D., & Rupakhety, R. (2021a). Seismic vulnerability of vernacular residential buildings in Bhutan. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 26(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1868362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chettri, N., Gautam, D., & Rupakhety, R. (2021b). From Tship Chim to Pa Chim: Seismic vulnerability and strengthening of Bhutanese vernacular buildings. In R. Rupakhety & D. Gautam (Eds.), Masonry construction in active seismic regions (1st ed. Ca). MA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chettri, N., Thinley, J., & Koirala, G. S. (2020). The comparative study on vernacular dwellings in Bhutan. United International Journal for Research and Technology, 01(02), 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Division of Conservation of Heritage Sites. (2006). Architectural Heritage Journal. Thimphu: Division of Conservation of Heritage Sites.

  • Division of Conservation of Heritage Sites. (2013). Bhutan’s heritage in our hands. Thimphu: Division of Conservation of Heritage Sites.

  • Division of Conservation of Heritage sites. (2019). South Asian Cultural Landscape Initiatives:Experience in Bhutan. Thimphu, Bhutan: Division of Conservation of Heritage Sites.

  • Dorje, D. R. (1991). A Brief Historical Background of the Religious Institutions of Bhutan. Buddhist Himalaya: A Journal of Nagarjuna Institute of Exact Methods, Vol. III(I & II). Retrieved from http://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JR-BH/bh117506.htm.

  • Dorji, C. (2016). Mendre Togchhung Lhakhang. Retrieved January 10, 2021, from Bhutan Cultural Atlas website: https://bhutanculturalatlas.clcs.edu.bt/2045/culture/sites-structures/monasteries-temples/mendre-togchhung-lhakhang-2/

  • Dorji, S., & Phuntsho, D. (2020). Dungkhar Ugyen Choeling Gonpa: A Temple that was Built with Gifted Stones. Bhutan Journal of Research and Development, 9(2), 81–97.

  • Dziembowska-Kowalska, J., & Funck, R. H. (2000). Cultural activities as a location factor in European competition between regions: Concepts and some evidence. The Annals of Regional Science, 34, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001680050123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, A., & Ioannidis, C. (2004). Photogrammetric and surveying methods for the geometric recording of archaeological monuments. Archaeological Surveys, FIG Working Week.

  • Ghaderi, Z., Dehghan Pour Farashah, M., Aslani, E., & Hemati, B. (2020). Managers’ perceptions of the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings as boutique hotels: Insights from Iran. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 15, 696–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2020.1756834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Mastalerczyk, J. (2016). The place and role of religious architecture in the formation of urban space. Procedia Engineering, 161, 2053–2057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givel, M. (2015). Mahayana Buddhism and gross national happiness in Bhutan. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(2), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i2.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ijla, A., & Broström, T. (2015). The sustainable viability of adaptive reuse of historic buildings: The experiences of two world heritage Old Cities; Bethlehem in Palestine and Visby in Sweden. International Invention Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 2(4), 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamtsho, T. (2018). The accounts of Choje Drak and Babron Tharpaling, Bumthang. Journal of Bhutan Studies, 19(Winter), 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. D. (1982). Manual of Photogrammetry, eds C.C. Slama, C. Theurer and S.W. Hendrikson, American Society of Photogrammetry, Falls Church, Va., 1980, Fourth Edition, 180 × 260mm, xvi and 1056 pages (with index), 72 tables, 866 figures. ISBN 0 937294 01 2. Cartography, 12(4), 258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00690805.1982.10438226

  • Knapp, R. K. (2012). Buddhist sacred natural sites conservation: a meeting ground between international and local. In Buddhism Without Borders: Proceedings of the International Conference on Globalized Buddhism. Thimpu, Bhutan: The Centre for Bhutan Studies (pp. 122–35).

  • Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for befinners. Sage Publications Limited.

  • Ministry of Works and Human Settlement. (2014). Bhutanese Architecture Guidelines. Retrieved from www.mowhs.gov.bt

  • Najimi, A. (2011). Built heritage in Afghanistan: Threats, challenges and conservation. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 68, 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2011.573961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Urban Development Corporation. (1993). An Introduction to Traditional Architecture of Bhutan. Retrieved from https://books.google.bt/books?id=meoLGQAACAAJ

  • Nuryanti, W. (1996). Heritage and postmodern tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00062-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviedo, G., & Jeanrenaud, S. (2007). Protecting sacred natural sites of indigenous and traditional peoples. Protected areas and spirituality, 77–99.

  • Pegon, P., Pinto, A. V., & Géradin, M. (2001). Numerical modelling of stone-block monumental structures. Computers and Structures, 79(22), 2165–2181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00070-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penjore, D. (2005). Oral construction of exile life and times of Künkhyen Longchen Rabjam in Bumthang. Journal of Bhutan Studies, 13(November), 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phuntsho, K. (2013). The History of Bhutan. Noida London: Vintage books, Random House India.

  • Phuntsho, K. (2017). Lhakhang: Religious Structures. Retrieved January 9, 2021, from Mandala Collection- Texts website: https://texts.shanti.virginia.edu/book_pubreader/40756.

  • Rigyal, S., & Prude, M. A. (2017). Buddhism in contemporary Bhutan. The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Buddhism. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199362387.013.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigzin, T. (2000). A pilgrimage guide to Chhoekedrak and Tharpaling Bumthang: Bhutan. KMT Printing Press.

  • Rutte, C. (2011). The sacred commons: Conflicts and solutions of resource management in sacred natural sites. Biological Conservation, 144(10), 2387–2394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, S. D. S., & Marques, J. M. (2005). Valuing cultural heritage: the social benefits of restoring and old Arab tower. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 6(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2004.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M. (2002). About the synthesis of different methods in surveying. Potsdam, Germany: XVIII International Symposium of CIPA.

  • Sharma, D. (2018). Architectural documentation and virtual reconstruction of samtenchoeling Monastery Ruins at. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 6(3), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajcea-6-3-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, U. (2010). Exile and return: The Reinvention of Buddhism and Buddhist sites in modern India. South Asian Studies, 26, 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02666030.2010.514744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, A. (1991). The conservation of sacred sites: Sarnath, a case study. Landscape Research, 16, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426399108706347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The institute of Language and Cultural Centre. (2016). Bhutan cultural atlas. Kuensel Corporation Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, H.-M. (2020). The attractiveness of adaptive heritage reuse: A theoretical framework. Sustainability, 12(6), 2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2000). World Heritage. Retrieved August 11, 2021, from www.unesco.org website: https://whc.unesco.org/en/about/

  • Weferling, U. (2002). The influence of the surveying and documentation of buildings geometry to different investigation purposes (pp. 402–406). Potsdam, Germany: XVIII International Symposium of CIPA.

  • Yazdani Mehr, S. (2019). Analysis of 19th and 20th Century conservation key theories in relation to contemporary adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Heritage, 2, 920–937. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2010061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, H. M., Yakar, M., & Yildiz, F. (2008). Documentation of historical caravansaries by digital close range photogrammetry. Automation in Construction, 17, 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is thankful to College of Science and Technology, Royal University of Bhutan, Phuentsholing 21101, for assisting the project through Annual University Research grant (AURG). We exuberantly thank the management of Choedrak Monastery for their support during the entire phase of project. The data are record of consultancy services carried out by the authors and funds were covered from it.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, J.T. and N.C.; Data collection and field survey, J.T. and C.; methodology, J.T. and C.; data curation, N.C.;writing—original draft preparation, N.C. and J.T.; writing—review and editing, J.T. and C.; supervision, C.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nimesh Chettri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thinley, J., Chimi, C. & Chettri, N. Spiritual and Spatial Significance of Choedrak Monastery in the Cultural Geography of Bhutan. Arch 17, 407–430 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-021-09432-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-021-09432-z

Key words

Navigation