Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Global Application of Indigenous Archaeology: Community Based Participatory Research in Turkey

  • Research
  • Published:
Archaeologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What does Indigenous archaeology offer archaeologists who do not work on Native land, at Indigenous sites, or with Indigenous people? This article demonstrates the broad applicability of Indigenous archaeology and the way it can be utilized by archaeologists working in any locale. Through recent fieldwork in south central Turkey working with a non-indigenous community of local residents near the archaeological site of Çatalhöyük, I demonstrate ways that the theories and methodology of Indigenous archaeology are a useful and relevant part of practice for archaeologists working in areas that are neither on Native land nor involve sites related to indigenous heritage. It also points to the need for further investigation into collaborative methods for the development of a set of best practices within archaeological and heritage management settings.

Résumé

Qu’est-ce que l’archéologie Indigène peut offrir aux archéologues qui ne travaillent pas dans des contextes Indigènes, c’est-à-dire dans des pays, des gisements, ou avec des peuples Indigènes? Est-ce que ses méthodes et théories sont applicables en dehors de ces contextes? Une grande diversité d’excellentes études démontre que l’archéologie Indigène continue à gagner des adeptes parmi ceux qui travaillent avec des natifs Américains, des Premières Nations, et d’autres groupes indigènes partout dans le monde. Pour ma part (Atalay S. American Indian Quarterly 30(3):280–310, 2006) et avec d’autres (Nicholas G.P. At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada. Archaeology Press, Burnaby, B.C., pp 85–104, 1997), nous avons soutenu l’idée que l’archéologie Indigène est non seulement pertinente dans des contextes Indigènes, mais qu’elle peut aussi constituer une approche de toute première importance pour les archéologues ne travaillant pas avec des communautés Indigènes. Cet article démontre le large potentiel d’application de l’archéologie Indigène et la façon dont elle peut être mise en pratique par des archéologues quelque soit le contexte. A travers l’exemple de travaux récents dans le centre-sud de la Turquie et avec une communauté non-Indigène établie près du gisement de Çatalhöyük, je démontre comment les théories et méthodes de l’Archéologie Indigène sont utiles et appropriées dans la perspective de pratiques éthiques pour les archéologues qui travaillent dans des zones qui n’appartiennent pas à des territoires indigènes ni sur des sites faisant partie du patrimoine indigène.

Resumen

¿Qué ofrece la arqueología indígena a los arqueólogos que no trabajan en tierras Nativas, en sitios indígenas, o con pueblos indígenas? Este articulo demuestra la amplia aplicación de la arqueología indígena y la manera en la que puede ser utilizada por arqueólogos que trabajan en otros sitios. A través de un trabajo de campo reciente en el centro sur de Turquía, trabajando con una comunidad no indígena de residentes locales cerca del sitio arqueológico de Çatalhöyük, demuestro las maneras en que las teorías y la metodología de la arqueología Indígena son una parte útil y relevante de la práctica de los arqueólogos que trabajan en areas que no son tierras Nativas ni involucran sitios relacionados con el patrimonio indígena. También apunta a la necesidad de profundizar la investigación en los métodos colaborativos para desarrollar un conjunto de las mejores prácticas dentro de los contextos de manejo arqueológico y de patrimonio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Arcury T.A., Sara A.Q., Allen D. 2001. Farmworker Pesticide Exposure and Community-based Participatory Research: Rationale and Practical Applications. Environmental Health Perspectives 109(Suppl 3):429–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atalay, S. 2003. Domesticating Clay: Engaging with ‘They’: The Social Life of Clay Balls from Çatalhöyük, Turkey and Public Archaeology for Indigenous Communities. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Anthropology, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Atalay, S. 2005. Domesticating Clay: the Role of Clay Balls, Mini Balls, and Geometric Objects in Daily Life at Çatalhöyük. In Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–99 Seasons, edited by I. Hodder, chap. 6, pp. 139–168. Çatalhöyük Project Volume 5. McDonald Institute Monographs/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara

  • Atalay, S. 2006. Indigenous Archaeology as Decolonizing Practice. American Indian Quarterly 30(3):280–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Atalay, S. 2008. Pedagogy of Decolonization: Advancing Archaeological Practice Through Education. In Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology at the Trowel’s Edge: Exploring Methodology and Education in North American Archaeology, edited by S. Silliman. University of Arizona Press and the Amerind Foundation, Tucson (in press)

  • Atalay S., Hastorf C. 2006. Food, Meals, and Daily Activities: The Habitus of Food Practices at Neolithic, Çatalhöyük. American Antiquity 71(2):283–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartu A. 1999. Archaeological Practice as Guerilla Activity in Late Modernity. Journal of Mediterrenean Archaeology 12(1):91–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartu, A. 2000. Where is Çatalhöyük? Multiple Sites in the Construction of an Archaeological Site. In: Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük (McDonald Institute Monographs) (British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, Biaa Monograph, No 28)

  • Bartu, A. 2005. Entanglements/Encounters/Engagements with Prehistory: Çatalhöyük and its Publics. In Çatalhöyük Study Season Publications, edited by I. Hodder. McDonald Institute Monographs

  • Bartu Candan, A. 2006. Entanglements/Encounters/Engagements with Prehistory: Çatalhöyük and its Publics. In Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Themes from the 1995–99 Seasons, edited by I. Hodder. Çatalhöyük Research Project 6, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005. British Institute at Ankara Monograph 40.

  • Bond, G.C., and A. Gilliam (editors) 1997. Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power. Routledge, London

  • Bussink C. 2003. GIS as a Tool in Participatory Natural Resource Management: Examples from the Peruvian Andes. Mountain Research and Development 23(4):320–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conkey M. 2005. Dwelling at the Margins, Action at the Intersection? Feminist and Indigenous. Archaeologies 1(1):9–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluehr-Lobban, C. 2003. Dialogue for Ethically Concious Practice. In Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology: A Dialogue for Ethically Conscious Practice, edited by C. Fluehr-Lobban, 2nd edn, chap. 10, pp. 225–246. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek

  • Freire P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., and P. Jurmo 1988. Dialogue is Not a Chaste Event. Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Gathercole, P., and D. Lowenthal (editors) 1990. The Politics of the Past. Unwin-Hyman, London

  • Kuhn T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, R. (editor) 1989. Who Needs the Past?: Indigenous Values and Archaeology. Unwin Hyman, London

  • Layton, R. (editor) 1994. Conflict in the Archaeology of Living Traditions. Routledge, London

  • Maguire P. 1987. Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach. Center for International Education, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Y. (editor) 2002. Community Archaeology. World Archaeology 34(2), October

  • Nicholas G.P. 1997. Education and Empowerment: Archaeology with, for and by the Shuswap Nation, British Colombia. In At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada, edited by G.P. Nicholas and T.D. Andrews, pp. 85–104. Archaeology Press, Burnaby, B.C

  • Parks, S., and K. Prufer 2006. The intersection between archaeology and the community in the developing world. Session Organized for the American Anthropological Association Annual Meetings. San Jose, CA

  • Riley J., Fielding, W.J. 2001. An Illustrated Review of Some Farmer Participatory Research Techniques. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 6(1):5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson M.P. 1996. Shampoo Archaeology: Towards a Participatory Action Research in Civil Society. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies XVI(1):125–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönhuth, M. 2002. Negotiating with Knowledge at Development Interfaces: Anthropology and the Quest for Participation. In Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge, edited by P. Sillitoe, A. Bicker, and J. Pottier, chap. 7, pp. 149–161. Routledge, London

  • Sert, G. 2005. Summer School Workshop. Çatalhöyük Archive Report, pp. 274–276. http://www.Çatalhöyük.com/archive_reports/

  • Sert, G. 2006. Childrens’ Archaeological Summer School. Çatalhöyük Archive Report, pp. 360–362. http://www.Çatalhöyük.com/archive_reports/

  • Sillitoe, P., A. Bicker, and J. Pottier (editors) 2002. Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge. Routledge, London

  • Strand K.J., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., Marullo S., Donohue P. 2003. Community-Based Research and Higher Education: Principles and Practices. Jossey Bass Publishing, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P., and R. MacKenzie (editors) 1990. The Excluded Past: Archaeology in Education. Unwin Hyman, Boston

  • Twyman C. 2000. Participatory Conservation? Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Botswana. The Geographical Journal 166(4):323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted with the generous support of the National Science Foundation (Grant # 0512031). The Turkish government and the Turkish Ministry of Culture have always been kind and generous hosts during my time in their beautiful country. My appreciation and thanks to them for their hospitality and support. The local communities around Catalhoyuk have also been an inspiration to me in this work and my eternal gratitude is extended to them for allowing me to be part of their community, even if for a short time. I would also like to thank Claire Smith and Darren Modzelewski for their editing work and inviting me to be part of this collection of articles on Indigenous archaeology. My sincere thanks go to the two anonymous reviewers who provided me with very helpful comments that improved the quality of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonya L. Atalay (Ojibwe).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atalay (Ojibwe), S.L. Global Application of Indigenous Archaeology: Community Based Participatory Research in Turkey. Arch 3, 249–270 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-007-9026-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-007-9026-8

Keywords

Navigation