Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of preoperative and intraoperative factors on recovery after aortic root surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the influence of intraoperative factors relative to preoperative risk factors on recovery after aortic root replacement (ARR).

Methods

Retrospective review of baseline and intraoperative characteristics was performed of 822 patients at our Aortic Center from 2005 to 2019. Inclusion criteria were all patients age 18 and older who underwent ARR at our institution from 2005 to 2019. The primary endpoint was the aggregate outcome of “failure to achieve uneventful recovery (FUR),” as previously defined.

Results

In total, 207 (25%) patients experienced FUR. The following preoperative and intraoperative variables were significantly associated with FUR in the multivariable analysis: cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01–1.02) open chest management (OR 5.67, 95% CI 2.65–12.1), ejection fraction (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.04), chronic kidney disease > stage 3a (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.54–3.63), bicuspid aortic valve (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.21–1.96), and female sex (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06–1.61). Cardiopulmonary bypass time and open chest management were among the top three partial R2 contributors to the logistic regression model variance.

Conclusions

These findings suggest efficacy in using intraoperative parameters to predict postoperative outcomes after ARR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bentall H, De Bono A. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta. Thorax. 1968;23(4):338–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sarsam MA, Yacoub M. Remodeling of the aortic valve anulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105(3):435–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beckmann E, Martens A, Pertz J, Kaufeld T, Umminger J, Hanke JS, et al. Valve-sparing David I procedure in acute aortic type A dissection: a 20-year experience with more than 100 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52(2):319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams JB, Peterson ED, Zhao Y, O’Brien SM, Andersen ND, Miller DC, et al. Contemporary results for proximal aortic replacement in North America. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(13):1156–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallen T, Habertheuer A, Bavaria JE, Hughes GC, Badhwar V, Jacobs JP, et al. Elective aortic root replacement in North America: analysis of STS adult cardiac surgery database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(5):1307–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes GC, Zhao Y, Rankin JS, Scarborough JE, O’Brien S, Bavaria JE, et al. Effects of institutional volumes on operative outcomes for aortic root replacement in North America. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):166–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Putte BP, Ozturk S, Siddiqi S, Schepens MA, Heijmen RH, Morshuis WJ. Early and late outcome after aortic root replacement with a mechanical valve prosthesis in a series of 528 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(2):503–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamabe T, Zhao Y, Sanchez J, Kelebeyev S, Bethancourt C-NR, Mcmullen HL, et al. Probability of uneventful recovery after elective aortic root replacement for aortic aneurysm. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110(5):1485–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Surgeons TSoT. STS adult cardiac surgery database data specifications. 2020.

  10. Pearsall C, Blitzer D, Zhao Y, Yamabe T, Rajesh K, Kim I, et al. Long-term outcome of hemiarch replacement in a proximal aortic aneurysm repair: analysis of over 1000 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(1):ezab571.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung MM, Erwin WC, Ning Y, Zhao Y, Chan C, D’Angelo A, et al. A novel dosing strategy of del Nido cardioplegia in aortic surgery. JTCVS Open. 2022;10:39–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Honzel E, Nemeth S, Kazzi BE, Kossar AP, Sun J, Kaku Y, et al. Assessing sex-based differences in postsurgical clinical outcomes after use of del Nido cardioplegia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(5):ezac472.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. D’Angelo AM, Nemeth S, Wang C, Kossar AP, Takeda K, Takayama H, et al. Re-dosing of del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery requiring prolonged aortic cross-clamp. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;34(4):556–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ota T, Yerebakan H, Neely RC, Mongero L, George I, Takayama H, et al. Short-term outcomes in adult cardiac surgery in the use of del Nido cardioplegia solution. Perfusion. 2016;31(1):27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yerebakan H, Sorabella RA, Najjar M, Castillero E, Mongero L, Beck J, et al. Del Nido cardioplegia can be safely administered in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting surgery after acute myocardial infarction: a propensity matched comparison. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;9:141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tang GHL, Borger MA. Aortic root replacement surgery: indications, techniques and outcomes. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2005;3(5):845–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Volguina IV, Miller DC, LeMaire SA, Palmero LC, Wang XL, Connolly HM, et al. Valve-sparing and valve-replacing techniques for aortic root replacement in patients with marfan syndrome: analysis of early outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(5):1124–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leontyev S, Davierwala PM, Krögh G, Feder S, Oberbach A, Bakhtiary F, et al. Early and late outcomes of complex aortic root surgery in patients with aortic root abscesses†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;49(2):447–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Estrera AL, Porat EE, Miller CC III, Meada R, Achouh PE, Irani AD, et al. Outcomes of delayed sternal closure after complex aortic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(6):1039–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boeken U, Assmann A, Mehdiani A, Akhyari P, Lichtenberg A. Open chest management after cardiac operations: outcome and timing of delayed sternal closure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(5):1146–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Madhavan S, Chan S-P, Tan W-C, Eng J, Li B, Luo H-D, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass time: every minute counts. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;59(2):274–81.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Doenst T, Borger MA, Weisel RD, Yau TM, Maganti M, Rao V. Relation between aortic cross-clamp time and mortality — not as straightforward as expected. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(4):660–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Burt BM, ElBardissi AW, Huckman RS, Cohn LH, Cevasco MW, Rawn JD, et al. Influence of experience and the surgical learning curve on long-term patient outcomes in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(5):1061-7-8.e1-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen Q-H, Wang H-L, Liu L, Shao J, Yu J, Zheng R-Q. Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Murphy GJ, Reeves BC, Rogers CA, Rizvi SIA, Culliford L, Angelini GD. Increased mortality, postoperative morbidity, and cost after red blood cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2007;116(22):2544–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Andersen ND, Ganapathi AM, Hanna JM, Williams JB, Gaca JG, Hughes GC. Outcomes of acute type a dissection repair before and after implementation of a multidisciplinary thoracic aortic surgery program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(17):1796–803.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroo Takayama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Isaac George has received Institutional funding to Columbia University from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, JenaValve. Dr. Isaac George has received speaker honoraria from Zimmer Biomet, Atricure, Neosurgery, Neptune Medical, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific and owns stock in Valcare Medical, Durvena, CardioMech, Vdyne, MitreMedical, MITRx. Dr. Isaac George is a member of Edwards Surgical, Medtronic Surgical, Trisol Medical, Abbvie, Johnson & Johnson, Foldax Medical, Zimmer Biomet, Neosurgery, Abbvie, and Boston Scientific advisory boards. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anzai, I., Pearsall, C., Blitzer, D. et al. Influence of preoperative and intraoperative factors on recovery after aortic root surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 72, 104–111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01957-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01957-0

Keywords

Navigation