Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical outcome of intraoperative hemodialysis using a hemoconcentrator during cardiopulmonary bypass for dialysis-dependent patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The basic materials and structure of a hemoconcentrator incorporated into cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits are similar to those of hemodialyzers. Gravity drainage hemodiafiltration (GHDF) is an easy-to-use intraoperative renal replacement therapy (RRT) that utilizes a hemoconcentrator. This study aimed to verify whether GHDF can correct electrolyte imbalance and remove uremic toxins in dialysis-dependent patients and to evaluate the clinical outcomes of GHDF by comparing it with a conventional method of dilutional ultrafiltration (DUF).

Methods

This study retrospectively compared perioperative clinical values of 41 dialysis-dependent patients (21 patients with GHDF and 20 patients with DUF) who underwent open-heart surgery. Changes in serum parameters before and after passing through the hemoconcentrator were also compared.

Results

Compared to DUF, GHDF significantly lowered potassium, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine levels at the outflow of the hemoconcentrator. Less catecholamine was needed to wean CPB in GHDF than in DUF. The P/F ratio (arterial blood oxygen pressure/inhaled oxygen concentration) at the end of surgery was significantly higher in GHDF than in DUF (450.8 ± 149.7 vs. 279.3 ± 153.5; p < 0.001). Postoperative intubation time was shorter in GHDF than in DUF (8.3 ± 5.9 vs. 18.7 ± 16.1 h; p = 0.006). The major morbidity and mortality rates were comparable in both groups.

Conclusions

GHDF removed both potassium and uremic toxins more efficiently than DUF in dialysis-dependent patients. Less catecholamine was needed to wean CPB using GHDF. It improved the immediate postoperative respiratory function and enabled earlier extubation. GHDF is a novel and effective option for intraoperative RRT in dialysis-dependent patients undergoing open-heart surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HD:

Hemodialysis

GHDF:

Gravity drainage hemodiafiltration

DUF:

Dilutional ultrafiltration

CHDF:

Continuous hemodiafiltration

RRT:

Renal replacement therapy

References

  1. Kamohara K, Yoshikai M, Yunoki J, Fumoto H. Safety of perioperative hemodialysis and continuous hemodiafiltration for dialysis patients with cardiac surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;55:43–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murkin JM, Murphy DA, Finlayson DC, Waller JL. Hemodialysis during cardiopulmonary bypass: report of twelve cases. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:899–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ilson BE, Bland PS, Jorkasky DK, Shusterman N, Allison NL, Dubb JW, et al. Intraoperative versus routine hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing open-heart surgery. Nephron. 1992;61:170–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khoo MS, Braden GL, Deaton D, Owen S, Germain M, O’Shea M, et al. Outcome and complications of intraoperative hemodialysis during cardiopulmonary bypass with potassium-rich cardioplegia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:1247–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hakim M, Wheeldon D, Bethune DW, Milstein BB, English TA, Wallwork J. Haemodialysis and haemofiltration on cardiopulmonary bypass. Thorax. 1985;40:101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Frenken M, Krian A. Cardiovascular operations in patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:887–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Franga DL, Kratz JM, Crumbley AJ, Zellner JL, Stroud MR, Crawford FA. Early and long-term results of coronary artery bypass grafting in dialysis patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:813–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirai K, Sasaki A, Kondo T, Akiyama T, Kanauchi A, Amada N, et al. Development and clinical evaluation of gravity drainage type hemodiafiltration method for correction of hyperkalemia during extracorporeal circulation in open heart surgery. Jpn J Extra-Corporeal Technol. 2013;40:149–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashimoto K, Nogimoto T, Tani S, Fujikawa D, Nakao Y. The usefulness of gravity drainage hemodiafiltration in the management of hyperkalemia. Jpn J Extra-Corporeal Technology. 2017;44:385–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Journois D, Israel-Biet D, Pouard P, Rolland B, Silvester W, Vouhé P, et al. High-volume, zero-balanced hemofiltration to reduce delayed inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass in children. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:965–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heath M, Barbeito A, Welsby I, Maxwell C, Iribarne A, Raghunathan K. Using zero-balance ultrafiltration with dialysate as a replacement solution for toxin and eptifibatide removal on a dialysis-dependent patient during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:162–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang H, Yao T, Wang W, Zhu D, Zhang W, Chen H, et al. Continuous ultrafiltration attenuates the pulmonary injury that follows open heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:136–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamashita C, Hara Y, Kuriyama N, Nakamura T, Nishida O. Clinical effects of a longer duration of polymyxin b-immobilized fiber column direct hemoperfusion therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock. Ther Apher Dial. 2015;19:316–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Motomura N, Miyata H, Tsukihara H, Takamoto S. Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database Organization. Risk model of thoracic aortic surgery in 4707 cases from a nationwide single-race population through a web-based data entry system: the first report of 30-day and 30-day operative outcome risk models for thoracic aortic surgery. Circulation. 2008;118:S153–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, Nilsson J, Smith C, Goldstone AR, et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:734–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bäck C, Hornum M, Møller CJH, Olsen PS. Cardiac surgery in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2017;51:334–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horst M, Mehlhorn U, Hoerstrup SP, Suedkamp M, de Vivie ER. Cardiac surgery in patients with end-stage renal disease: 10-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:96–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mukaida H, Matsushita S, Inotani T, Nakamura A, Amano A. Continuous renal replacement therapy with a polymethyl methacrylate membrane hemofilter suppresses inflammation in patients after open-heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Artif Organs. 2018;21:188–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Otaki M, Enmoto T, Oku H. Coronary bypass grafting for patients dependent on dialysis: modified ultrafiltration for perioperative management. ASAIO J. 2003;49:650–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tagaya M, Matsuda M, Yakehiro M, Izutani H. Features of an alternative hemodialysis method using a hemoconcentrator during cardiopulmonary bypass surgeries. Perfusion. 2015;30:318–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kubota T, Miyata A, Maeda A, Hirota K, Koizumi S, Ohba H. Continuous haemodiafiltration during and after cardiopulmonary bypass in renal failure patients. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44:1182–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamilton CC, Harwood SJ, Deemar KA, Juhasz S, Sharpe E. Haemodialysis during cardiopulmonary bypass using a haemofilter. Perfusion. 1994;9:135–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Matata BM, Scawn N, Morgan M, Shirley S, Kemp I, Richards S, et al. A single-center randomized trial of intraoperative zero-balanced ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with impaired kidney function undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29:1236–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagashima M, Shin’oka T, Nollert G, Shum-Tim D, Rader CM, Mayer JE Jr. High-volume continuous hemofiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass attenuates pulmonary dysfunction in neonatal lambs after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Circulation. 1998;98:378–84.

    Google Scholar 

  25. García-Camacho C, Marín-Paz AJ, Lagares-Franco C, Abellán-Hervás MJ, Sáinz-Otero AM. Continuous ultrafiltration during extracorporeal circulation and its effect on lactatemia: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0242411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Elayashy M, Madkour MA, Mahmoud AAA, Hosny H, Hussein A, Nabih A, et al. Effect of ultrafiltration on extravascular lung water assessed by lung ultrasound in children undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized prospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19:93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kosour C, Dragosavac D, Antunes N, Almeida de Oliveira RA, Martins Oliveira PP, Wilson VR. Effect of ultrafiltration on pulmonary function and interleukins in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:884–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang H, Fan L, Liao H, Tu L, Zhang J, Xu D, Feng J. Correlations of cardiac function with inflammation, oxidative stress and anemia in patients with uremia. Exp Ther Med. 2021;21:250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Ohtsubo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or funding sources to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohtsubo, S., Itoh, T., Kawai, Y. et al. Clinical outcome of intraoperative hemodialysis using a hemoconcentrator during cardiopulmonary bypass for dialysis-dependent patients. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 71, 515–524 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01922-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01922-x

Keywords

Navigation