Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transfer of a minimally invasive mitral valve repair program from a high-volume center to a very low volume center: how many cases are necessary to maintain acceptable results?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate whether minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MIMVR) can be transferred from a high-volume center into a very small volume center and to clarify how many cases are necessary for maintenance of this program, early outcomes of MIMVR in Asahikawa Medical University were compared with those results in patients operated by a single surgeon in Duesseldorf University Hospital.

Methods

Sixty-five patients who underwent MIMVR in Asahikawa Medical University (group A) between May 2014 and July 2018 and 134 patients who underwent MIMVR in Duesseldorf University Hospital (group D) between September 2009 and January 2014 by a surgeon who started MIMVS later in Asahikawa were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

In group D, there were more patients with ischemic mitral valve regurgitation and with annular calcification than in group A. Survival rate at 6 months and 1 year was 98.5% and 98.5% in group A and 92.9% and 91.3% in group D, respectively. EuroSCORE II was significantly higher in patients dead within 30 days and within the first year.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that MIMVR programs can be transferred with acceptable early results into very low volume centers, if the team is developed by surgeons who are well trained and experienced in MIMVR. Moreover, the present study suggested that case number for maintenance of acceptable results may be obviously less than the previous recognition that this kind of specialized surgery could be maintained with at least 50 cases annually. However, meticulous preparations for surgery are essential for satisfactory surgical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falk V, Cheng DC, Martin J, Diegeler A, Folliguet TA, Nifong LW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: a consensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive coronary surgery (ISMICS) 2010. Innovations (Phila). 2011;6:66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Modi P, Rodriguez E, Hargrove WC 3rd, Hassan A, Szeto WY, Chitwood WR Jr. Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve surgery: a 12-year, 2-center experience in 1178 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:1481–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Loulmet DF, Carpentier A, Cho PW, Berrebi A, d’Attellis N, Austin CB, et al. Less invasive techniques for mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:772–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davierwala PM, Seeburger J, Pfannmueller B, Garbade J, Misfeld M, Borger MA, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: “The Leipzig experience”. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:744–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Beckmann A, Funkat AK, Lewandowski J, Frie M, Ernst M, Hekmat K, et al. German heart surgery report 2016: the annual updated registry of the German society for thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;65:505–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holzhey DM, Seeburger J, Misfeld M, Borger MA, Mohr FW. Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center. Circulation. 2013;128:483–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Masuda M, Okumura M, Doki Y, Endo S, Hirata Y, Kobayashi J, et al. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2014: annual report by the Japanese association for thoracic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;64:665 – 97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Casselman FP, Van Slycke S, Wellens F, De Geest R, Degrieck I, Vermeulen Y, et al. From classical sternotomy to truly endoscopic mitral valve surgery: a step by step procedure. Heart Lung Circ. 2003;12:172–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harjai KJ, Samy S, Pennypacker B, Onofre B, Stanfield P, Yaeger L, et al. Developing a new hybrid revascularization program: a road map for hospital managers and physician leaders. J Interv Cardiol. 2012;25:557–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen TC, Lamelas J. From the ground up: building a minimally invasive aortic valve surgery program. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4:178–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Vohra HA, Vaja R, Iakovakis I, Bapat V, Szostek J, Young C. Starting out in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in the UK. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter S. How to start a minimal access mitral valve program. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:774–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakaguchi T. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through a right mini-thoracotomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:699–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Bevilacqua S, Gasbarri T, Kallushi E, Farneti P, et al. Enhancing departmental quality control in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a single-institution experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:500–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Praetere H, Verbrugghe P, Rega F, Meuris B, Herijgers P. Starting minimally invasive valve surgery using endoclamp technology: safety and results of a starting surgeon. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20:351–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishi H, Miyata H, Motomura N, Toda K, Miyagawa S, Sawa Y, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive mitral valve repair using a nationwide surgical database. Surg Today. 2015;45:1144–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Midorigaoka Higashi 2-1-1-1, Asahikawa, 078-8510, Japan

    Hiroyuki Kamiya, Hiroto Kitahara, Hayato Ise, Sentaro Nakanishi & Natsuya Ishikawa

  2. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Midorigaoka Higashi 2-1-1-1, Asahikawa, 078-8510, Japan

    Hirotsugu Kanda & Takayuki Kunisawa

  3. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Duesseldorf University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany

    Jan-Philipp Minol, Artur Lichtenberg & Payam Akhyari

Authors
  1. Hiroyuki Kamiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroto Kitahara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hirotsugu Kanda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hayato Ise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sentaro Nakanishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Natsuya Ishikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takayuki Kunisawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jan-Philipp Minol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Artur Lichtenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Payam Akhyari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Kamiya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamiya, H., Kitahara, H., Kanda, H. et al. Transfer of a minimally invasive mitral valve repair program from a high-volume center to a very low volume center: how many cases are necessary to maintain acceptable results?. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67, 577–584 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01065-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01065-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation